Preview

Ethics of Dignity and Freedom

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
831 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics of Dignity and Freedom
Ethics of Dignity and Freedom
SUBDOMAIN 110.1 - Competency 110.1.4

Kant's theory of the Categorical Imperative was the first ethical theory to be based on the concepts of the dignity and freedom of man and the concept of reason as opposed to moral obligations derived from God, other human authorities or the preferences or desires of human agents. He believed that morality could be summed up in one ultimate principle. He called it the Categorical Imperative.
It attempts to describe a decision making process based on the deceptively simple question, "What ought we do?" He uses rules referred to as maxims as the basis for making decisions. According to Kant when we are contemplating whether an action is moral or immoral we should ask ourselves what rule or maxim we would be following when making the choice. Kant also stresses the autonomy of each human being as a rational agent based on their ability to reason and their right to be respected by others as rational agents. These two concepts can be presented in two formulations describing constraints that according to Kant should be applied to the maxims we adopt.
The first formulation is known as ‘The Formula of Universal Law'. Kant expresses this formulation like this:
"Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."
In a nutshell I like to think this means, "If I would wish that everyone do it then it's okay for me to do." This thought embodies the idea of the autonomy of human will that Kant believes exists. He believed that we are in essence each making our own moral laws based on reason and rationality (autonomy) as opposed to attempting to obey externally created sets of moral laws like the bible's 10 commandments (heteronomy). Kant opposed previous ethical theories largely because they violated this idea of the autonomy of human will.
The second formulation is referred to as the ‘The Formula of the End in Itself'. Kant

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s deontological theory of ethics is the normative ethical position that evaluates the morality of actions. Unlike the empiricist supporters of Utilitarianism, Kant was an unquestionable supporter of rationalism; the idea that pure reason can tell us how the world is, independent of experience. This idea is referred to as an a priori approach, because it makes the assumption that reasoning or knowledge is denoted from theoretical deduction rather than from observation or experience.…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kantian ethics are ethical principles set out by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), a German thinker from East Prussia, and arguably one of the most influential philosophers in Western philosophy. His ‘Categorical Imperative’ theory was devised from his desire to create a stand-alone ethical theory that would not rely on assumptions, hence he believed in an objective right or wrong based on reason as a pose to assumptions. According to Kant, morals are a Priori synthetic because they are absolute, existing in and of themselves, and do not need to be experienced for them to exist. However, upon testing, it is also obviously true that they are correct.…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Right

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good And Evil Casablanca

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believed that our actions must come from a sense of Duty, not because we care for or love one another but because it is our Duty to “respect the Moral Law” (p. 246). Judging the importance of a decision based on whether or not it was following a rule or set of rules is called deontological ethics. He believed that it was not the consequences of the action which were important but the person’s motive carrying out the said action. Many disagree with Kant saying that we must have a foundation to start from, a reason such as love or concern to do what is morally…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs. Mill

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant claims that there is a right way to determine how to treat other rational beings, as well as themselves. Kant describes this as being the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative states that an individual ought not make an exception for one’s self to act in a way they themselves would not want by other individuals. Kant requires that a person’s maxim should only be acted upon if the action and…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Prisoner Doctors

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant, I. (1990). “Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals.” Exploring philosophy: an introductory anthology (4th ed., pp. 415-420). New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    kant

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant’s diagnoses the human condition as human’s frailty and impurity when distinguishing between one’s self interested inclinations and moral duty. Humans were “…finite beings with our individual needs…yet we [were] also rational beings, and for Kant that include[d]…the recognition of moral obligations” (Stevenson and Haberman p.155). The contrast and ever-apparent strain between these opposing sides of human nature fuel Kant’s diagnosis of human’s frailty. In Kant’s conception of human reason and action, he distinguished between categorical and hypothetical imperatives which displayed the human struggles regarding what decisions were morally right. Self interested desires, “…which involve[ed] only the selection of means to satisfy one’s own desire” (p.151) could be defined as a hypothetical imperative. However, categorical imperative claims “…that morality is fundamentally a function of [one’s] reason, not just [one’s] feelings” (p.151). Knowing what was morally right and doing what was morally right was the depravity of human nature, the choice of choosing one’s own happiness over their obligations to those who surround them. The desire for instant gratification from any action hinders human’s consideration of longer-term self-interest. The difficulty arises when the one must decide to postpone immediate satisfaction in the interest of future goals; a “…balance to strike between living for the moment and planning for the future….” (p.155) must be reached. Human’s struggles with moral decisions and personal gain exemplify their…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant developed a system where moral duties are defined short laws called maxims. However, Kant argues that we do not need to follow all maxims. For instance, Kant in his book Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals claims that we must “act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” (Kant 421). Therefore Kant is saying that in order for something to be a maxim it must be something that would be great if everyone did it. For instance, if everyone were to help those in need, that would be great so that passes the universalization test.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first of the formulas for the categorical imperative is the universalizability principle—“Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” (Kant 30). By this principle, Kant places emphasis not on an action in and of itself, but the general rule that stands behind the act that is being considered. Further, Kant is unconcerned with the outcome of the action and his philosophy on morality is instead focused on the intention behind actions. Through this formulation, Kant’s philosophy essentially prohibits any human from making his or herself an exception to a rule that he or she would not want every other human to…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They command you to do X, whether or not you have the desire to do X. We must act in such a way that allows us to treat humanity as an end and never merely as a means. From this exposition, Kant argues that morality should not be something that differs from individual to individual; because we are rational human beings, we ought to give reasons for what we do, and we can act based on those reasons rather than acting simply because we want to. We should act, regardless of our own purposes, only on maxims (general ways of acting). For example, every human being should have the intention to act the same way another human being would in a moral dilemma.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Kant, being rational means being able to act based on motives that can be considered universally defensible. Human beings act out of respect for doing something because it is the rational thing to do and when they do this they are acting in terms of their duty which is what being moral means. Additionally, that what is means to act on the basis of a good will. Automony plays an important role in Kant's ethical theory as it considers humans as free self-guided beings. Thus, actions are seen by choice which places a moral responsibility onto humans which Kant regulates with the good will.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant believed in the ultimate good and fundamental rationality of humans. This formed the categorical imperative which decides if a decision is good or bad. If a decision can be applied universally and still be possible, it is likely rational. Otherwise the maxim will result in either a contradiction in conception resulting in a perfect duty or a contradiction in will or imperfect duty. Kant also believed that performing a good action for non-rational reasons is not morally good and rational decisions with consequences we cannot be held accountable for as it is outside of…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality "The good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes or because of it's adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it's willing, i.e., it is good of itself". A maxim is the generalized rule that characterizes the motives for a person's actions. For Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by the maxim of doing the right thing because it is right thing to do. The moral worth of an action is determined by whether or not it was acted upon out of respect for the moral law, or the Categorical Imperative. Imperatives in general imply something we ought to do however there is a distinction between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives are obligatory so long as we desire X. If we desire X we ought to do Y. However, categorical imperatives are not subject to conditions. The Categorical Imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures because they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Moral, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viablity of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant created a handful of formulations regarding his system of determining morality, the Categorical Imperative. James and Stuart Rachels in The Elements of Moral Philosophy, illuminate Kant's first and second Categorical Imperatives. While Kant claims the formulations are equivalent, they offer differing guidelines on how the Categorical Imperative is operated. Although the formulations share the same basis, the difference regarding how the formulations are adhered, is a large distinction difficult to ignore, and renders the two versions as separate subjects.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays