Preview

Eudomenia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
898 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eudomenia
Eudemonia
Eudemonia is the state of one being healthy, prosperous and happy. This is the state of one feeling contented with the environment and such a person is not in the state of discomfort. There are different views that used in the expression of the above state. They include the Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and finally the Epicurus. The discussion will dwell on the concept of the Socrates. According to the Socrates view, it has the notion that virtue is very vital for one to claim that one has eudemonia. Virtues such as justice, courage, wisdom, self control, piety among other traits of soul and mind should be fulfilled for one to clam that one is living a eudemonic life. The virtues are what guarantee a good and happy life. Socrates view greatly disagrees with the other notions that a happy life that is, eudemonic life has to do with the pleasure or honor. The view greatly criticized the Athenians for instance, the accumulation of riches and gaining of honors at the expense of caring for their souls. Athens at the time was a city of riches and wisdom but the dwellers continued to make more riches. The dwellers neglected their own internal affairs. The view outlines that individuals should care for their souls which is the same as saying that they should take caution of the virtues. Life is not worth living if the soul and the virtues are not taken care of that is, the soul is tremendously ruined by the wrong acts. This view has the greatest concern for the soul as the genesis of all the happiness that one can have and thus the person is termed as being eudemonic person. The argument behind is that happiness or the eudemonic state commences with a person’s body. What one satisfies in order to be happy is the soul and the external world. Eudemonic life calls for the soul to be attended. The body of person requires the best attention as failure to do so is what makes the body to respond negatively to the external and internal environment. The body has the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Everyone in society has different views on the best kind of life. Some people think that the best kind of life is one that is filled with family. Some may think that it is concerning living life without any regrets and being prosperous, healthy and having someone to share it all with. But this is not the case for Socrates. Having very profound views about what could be called the best kind of life for a human being. This paper is going to explore four areas that Socrates believes makes up the best kind of life for humans. The fist point that this paper is going too examine the values and how it was vital for Socrates. Secondly this paper is going to explore virtue. The Third point of this paper is the pursuit of happiness. And lastly…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Greece, leading a good life is rather more complex than it is in today’s society. It is evidenced in Plato’s four dialogs in The Trial and Death of Socrates. Through the dialogues of Socrates we can learn that in Ancient Greece education, religion, society in general, law and values played a major role on a person’s way of living a good life. In the dialogues of The Trial and Death of Socrates, society condemned those such as Socrates for changing or questioning their way of life. A person in Ancient Greece must be a pious man who conforms to the laws and values of the society. We can learn how a man should lead a good life in Ancient Greece through the dialogues of Socrates in his trial.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s ethics focuses on virtues of character and good habits. His big term he uses is eudemonia, which means happiness.…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle proposes that eudaimonia is the most intrinsically valuable. Eudaimonia is defined as happiness, or well-being. It is the universally recognized chief good (Runes, 2004). Happiness is the ultimate human good, because when we ask ourselves why we do something, ultimately we come to the conclusion – because it makes us happy. Happiness is an end to itself. It is the ultimate human good. Through this, we can see three distinct characteristics to happiness: it is desirable for…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Material wealth and social status are imaginary assets. True value is found in questioning the standard and pursuing virtue through education and self-discipline. Philosophers Diogenes and Socrates both have commentaries on what it means to live with values, and though their holistic philosophies on life are very similar, their outlooks on this specific topic are poles apart. In this paper, I will contrast the beliefs of Diogenes and Socrates in regards to the evaluation of a life of worth.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eudaimonia is a central concept for the Greeks. It means living well, or having a good soul (i.e., being the right sort of person). Attaining eudaimonia is the goal of their ethics.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s writings on happiness are seen as a representation of Socrate’s view since Plato was his student, and presents his writings on happiness in three dialogues, namely Euthydemus, The Symposium and The Republic. As to necessary conditions for happiness in the Euthydemus, he argues first that happiness is what everybody desires; it is the end or goal of all our activities, unconditional good; secondly, he says that happiness does not depend on external things but rather how those things are used. For instance, one cannot claim that money brings happiness, but rather how money is used is what determines happiness. An ignorant person will waste away the money and end up worse than before, but a wise person will use the money well for his own good, and the same applies to external things, such as looks or even…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Good Life

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Callicles views as a happy and good life seemed “insatiable [and] undisciplined,” like a leaky jar. Just like it is better for a jar to be faultless, one’s soul should be faultless also because isn’t one better off with “the orderly life, the life that is satisfied with its circumstances”? Socrates states that the leaky jar equals a life that is not orderly. He says that a good life is when one has a comfortable amount of content in one’s jar, an amount that one can handle. A bad life is when the content spills, overflows, or leaks because of the lack of discipline and restraint. A bad life is when one cannot restrain oneself from getting more than one can comfortably handle. As an analogy, he talks about two men with jars full of things that scare and difficult to come by. Man #1 doesn’t put anything more into his jars and relaxes. Man #2 has jars that are leaky and rotten, so he must constantly fill them if he does not want to suffer pain. To this, Callicles says he would rather be Man #2 because since Man #1 has filled himself up, he will experience neither joy nor pain, which is a life of a stone. For him, living pleasantly isn’t being full or content; one can experience pleasure “as much as possible flow in”, because any pleasure, even scratching an itch, is pleasure. And of course Socrates disagrees saying that it isn’t right to say all pleasure is good because pleasures can be good and bad, no matter how enjoyable…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy 120w

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Looking at the world as a big picture and everyone who is in it, they all seem to strive for the same thing in life, happiness. Happiness or Eudemonia as Aristotle calls it, is created through the process of combining five different components. These are the following components: Human function, the rational part of the soul, habituation, character, and virtue. Since our society craves happiness and views it as the best achievement we could have, Aristotle described it as the ultimate end.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Exile

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the book The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates is faced to refute a friend's argument for him to escape Athens and not to be put to death. Socrates however, being a man of pious intent and just composition, believes for many reasons, that escaping is not the just thing to do. He provides many reasons for his point of view, The main reason Socrates does not flee Athens is because of the way he lives his life. What was ultimately most important about Socrates' inquiries was, indeed, the unceasing practice and habit of being critical and thoughtful--of not being blind to one's own unfounded convictions and presuppositions. Thoughtfulness and critical self-awareness as a way of life is what Socrates stands for. Socrates ultimate way of life was to live one’s life and focus on self-development, rather than trying to become rich.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the biggest points of dispute in the Ancient-Modern debate concerns happiness and how one might define and eventually become happy. To properly understand the Ancient-Modern debate, it is necessary that one understand the principles that support this debate: in particular, that there is a relationship that exists between morality and politics, that politics is not the end in itself, and that human nature is complex, often contradictory, but graspable if sufficiently analyzed. When speaking of these principles, the Ancients argued that morality and virtue play an influential role in both the private and public life and that a good and honest ruler must possess each. Socrates, the great Greek philosopher, claimed that as did Boethius who…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I read this part of the passage in my textbook about being hook to an “experience machine” that would guarantee a constant state of happiness and positive emotion did cross my mind. I thought about what it would be like just to feel the constant emotion of being happy. At first I thought it would be an incredible experience. Never having to worry, or to feel sad, to feel rejected or lonely would be awesome not to feel those emotions anymore. However, to be in a constant state of being happy and always positive could take away the fulfillment of actually living life. Eudaimonic is defined as self-realization, meaning the expression and fulfillment of inner potential. So from this perspective, the good life results from living in accordance with your true self. It’s a process in which our talents, needs, and deeply held values direct the way we conduct our lives. The hedonic view captures a major element of what we mean by happiness in everyday terms: we enjoy life, we are satisfied with how our…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle And Pieper

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Virtues can be classified to different parts of the soul. The nature of happiness is very abstract, defining the soul in different virtues helps us specify what happiness is. According to Aristotle the soul has a vegetative component, an appetite component and a calculative component. Altogether the soul is like a map of human capacities and one must know how to navigate through it.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Virtue is the key to a meaningful and happy life. According to ancient philosophers, Socrates and Aristotle, developing virtue is vital in order to lead a successful, fulfilling life. Though both men differ in their interpretations of a "good life," they both agree that the supreme life is one of virtuous meaning. Each of the philosophers have devised and implemented their own definitions and guidelines to acquire and practice a virtuous disposition. While it is agreed that knowledge and practice are the key to virtuosity, the philosophers disagree on fundamental rules to follow. The inherent question to be explored concerns the idea of virtue; what is it and how does one acquire it? The answer is anything but simple, but a blend of both philosophies can shed light on the two men 's view on practicing a virtuous life. Socrates and Aristotle believe in distinct ends to a common mean.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays