A gravely ill man lies in bed awaiting death. He exerts all his energy upon every breath he takes. One of life's agonies is waiting for it all to be over. Euthanasia, a remedy for this man's unfortunate situation, could be his solution to happiness. It has been a highly controversial debate not only in recent years, but also since 1870’s in the United States and Europe. Euthanasia is the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment, it is knew literally as “Easy and Good Death” and as the “Mercy Killing”(Britannica Encyclopedia 2012). Should Euthanasia be a legal option for the terminally ill? To begin, one aspect of euthanasia's benefits is the fact that the quality of life when a person is chronically ill tends to be very bad. Euthanasia can end an uncomfortable and painful life. Secondly, euthanasia can save families money on medical bills. The cost of keeping a person alive with an unfortunate fate would be higher than a person who chooses to pass away. Lastly, a person, legally, should have the right to end their life. Firstly, the issue of quality of life plays a large role in the support of euthanasia. Lying in bed all day can be a form of torture within itself. Bed sores and boredom result from staying in bed, wasting away. Also, illness such as cancerous diseases and other sicknesses decline the quality of life (Web.Ebscohost.com). Of course, pain plays a role in this matter. It's very difficult to function in everyday life when pain is a constant companion. To most people with any of these problems, in their point of view, value of existence can be low. it is cheaper if a patient with an incurable illness dies quickly so that they do not need expensive care and drugs any longer. Remaining along on this issue, the cost of medical bills and like billing can cost families a lot of money. Health insurance covers an average of 80 percent of medical billing (www.medicare.gov). These insurance companies only provide a certain amount of money for care and then leave it to the immediate family of the person within medical care. When the savings of the patient run out, the money planned to be passed on to spouses and loved ones. For the reason that the patient has leaved to live. Euthanasia save also the patient’s family and friends having to watch them die a slow and agonizing death. Also it save the sadness of the patient having to watch as his or her life end. It is said that the health and happiness you have in your lifetime is more important, than the length of your life and that people should not have to keep an living if they feel they have nothing to live for. As a final point, legally, people should be able to make the decision to kill themselves. The United States prohibits the act of suicide and euthanasia. Europe allows it, and it actually has professional organizations such as DIGNITAS® who professionally assist people in doctor assisted suicide (Yuma.sirsi.net). In the United States, abortion is permitted. The phrase used is "my body, my decision". Should not that apply to mercy killing also? The decision to live or die usually rests with the individual, unless he or she is too ill to make a reasonable decision. In a case like this, only immediate family members, such as spouses or the parents are given the right to choose to end their loved one's life of pain and suffering, due to a terminal illness or incurable condition. Usually, the only time the parents are really given the choice is when their loved one is not married. In conclusion when an ill person gets ill, should he or she has to lie in bed and await death? Should people grasp onto life for as long as possible? The quality of life begins to get worse with pain and suffering, and it costs a lot of money to keep a person alive. The legal aspect of euthanasia is unfair, with abortion being completely legal, and mercy killing forbidden. Would it be right? Should a dying person experience pain and suffering in their last days? All I can say is if a person is holding on to a terrible life of pain and discomfort, why should the have to wait and wait to have the torture end. There are no easy answers to these questions and the debate will continue for many years to come.
1
2
3
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Euthanasia should be legalized to allow terminally ill patients the opportunity to prepare for their deaths, avoid unnecessary pain and die with dignity. Euthanasia is “the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment.” (Am. Heritage) The literal meaning of the word euthanasia, "‘an easy or happy death,’ from the Greek word eu- ‘good’, and thanatos ‘death’"(Harper), is proof in itself that the whole idea is to help people and not to belittle the value of life. The fact that suffering animals can be put out of their misery, but suffering people are forced to stay alive and endure the pain, is inhumane. Legalizing euthanasia would be no more than an act of mercy allowing medical personnel to bring slow, painful deaths to a halt.…
- 985 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The overall purpose of the Euthanasia act it to allow those who are terminally ill to have to right to die on their own terms. Euthanasia is a drug that those who wish to die on their own terms are given in the formal of a pill. After receiving the pill, the patient then shallows the pill, ending their own life on their own terms. This concept of Euthanasia as caused a lot of controversy over the past couple of years. Specifically within the year of 2014, the act of Euthanasia has caught the attention of many, especially who of high position within our government. While this act of assisted suicide is illegal in many of our states today, some states such as Washington, Oregon, Montana, Vermont and New Mexico carry out his law off dying on your own terms. Many well known case of these issues of dying on your own terms such as Washington v. Glucksberg (1997), Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) Baxter v. Montana (2009). " Reflecting the religious and cultural diversity of the United States, there is a wide range of public opinion about euthanasia and the right-to-die movement in the United States. During the past 30 years, public research shows that views on euthanasia tend to correlate with religious affiliation and culture, though not gender." (CNN.COM) "The legislation of assisted suicide has moved a significant step closer after the Government made clear that it would not stand in the way of a change in the law.Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs and peers – including Coalition ministers – will be given a free vote on a Bill that would enable doctors to help terminally ill patients to die, The Telegraph can disclose.The proposed legislation will come before Parliament in the next few months. On Saturday night, Norman Lamb, a Liberal Democrat and the minister responsible for care for elderly and disabled people, was among the first to say he would vote in favor. Several other ministers and senior MPs and peers have previously signaled support for the move. Mr.…
- 370 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
“The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for ‘good death’. It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment. Because of this many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering” (1). I strongly agree in legalizing euthanasia in our society, and I will be applying the ethical doctrine Utilitarianism to defend my case. Euthanasia minimizes the suffering that affects those involved. Euthanasia is already legal in Holland, Luxembourg and Belgium, and permitted in Switzerland if performed by a non-doctor. In the US, the State of Washington, Montana, and Oregon have already passed laws in support of euthanasia while a recent Gallop poll finds that the vast majority of Americans continue to support "right-to-die" laws for terminally ill patients. The following benefits to legalizing euthanasia are: patients’ are saved from unwanted suffering, free up the nurses and doctors time for savable patients, vital organs can be saved, allowing doctors to save the lives of others, and health care cost would be reduced.…
- 859 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There are four common issues that people have with euthanasia. First, it allows doctors to play “God” because the most common form of active euthanasia is doctor assisted suicide (Atwood-Gailey 61.) This is done by doctors giving a lethal dose of medicine to a patient resulting in their death (Rebman 7.) This leads to the second prolife argument which is that euthanasia violates the Hippocratic Oath that every doctor must take in order to have a profession in any medical field. The Hippocratic Oath is as…
- 1672 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…
- 1169 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The debate over euthanasia and physician assisted suicide is a multifaceted issue that surges throughout political, religious, and social circles. Currently in the United States, physician assisted suicide is only legal in Washington and Oregon states. It is crucial that nurses understand the various aspects of this topic, and are able to formulate an educated opinion on the issue. This paper will examine the various aspects of euthanasia, including pros, cons, and nursing implications, in order to assist student nurses in formulating their own opinions on this highly charged topic.…
- 4624 Words
- 19 Pages
Best Essays -
Those who approve of euthanasia feel that it is not a problem for someone who is intensely suffering to be granted the wish of dying to end pain. There are many controversies over whether or not euthanasia should be legal. As for me, I strongly believe that killing someone or assisting…
- 1753 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Euthanasia, or doctor assisted suicide, has been subject of controversy in North America for a number of decades. Prior to the argument of whether or not euthanasia should be legalized for the terminally ill, it is important to differentiate between the two types of doctor assisted suicide. Passive euthanasia is withholding treatment necessary for ones health and allowing nature to take its course. Active euthanasia, the most controversial of the two, is the use of forces, such as lethal injections that will directly result in death. With that being said, doctor assisted suicide should be legalized for the terminally ill. It is within a persons own choice whether they wish to live or die, if they decide there is no longer a quality of life, they should be allowed the choice. If consent is given from the patient as well as next of kin, there should not be an issue with fulfilling ones dying wish. Finally, when one is terminally ill, it is inevitable that the disease will deteriorate at the physical health, and eventually they will die. If one decides they do not wish to suffer, and wish to die with dignity, that should be an option. Euthanasia is controversial for a number of reasons, however, if boundaries and restrictions are negotiated, it is possible to better accommodate the wishes of patients who are suffering an inevitable death.…
- 1841 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Despite the medical advancements of the 20th century there isn’t a cure for cancer or brain damage and countless other diseases. Some patients with cancer walk out of hospitals others might die in unimaginable pain. People with UNREVERSABLE brain damage have less options. They either need assistance from machines and family for the rest of their life. Or they can even be in a state of vegetation where they can’t move at all. Alive only by their machines. In these conditions people should have the option of euthanasia. Euthanasia is when doctor administers a drug to kill a patient, all patients should have this option.…
- 542 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Living life in a hospital bed forever in pain is hardly a life anyone would want to live, and forcing this life upon someone is an immoral and terrible thing to do. People choosing euthanasia elect to die, knowing that their life will never be the same nor will it be pleasant for them and those who are close to them. “To be alive is to totally and openly participate in the simplicity and elegance of here and now,” stated Donald Altman. Not being able to engage fully in life without suffering makes death a better option. Friends and family also suffer through the hardships of seeing someone they love dying and in pain, knowing they can do nothing to help.With these reasons in mind, euthanasia is one of the most moral treatments in our world today. It provides relief for everyone suffering from an incurable and painful disease.…
- 963 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Proponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide argue that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death. Opponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide argue that doctors have a moral responsibility to keep their patients alive as reflected by the Hippocratic Oath. Euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide should be legal because terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death.…
- 714 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Patients may feel bad for reason that they cannot be independent, and may believe that they are a burden to their caregivers, as well as reasons of extreme pain. It’s really in the patient’s best interest and what is best for them. Euthanasia relives ill people with the end of suffering.…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is a very controversial topic with people not just in America, but around the world. Let’s start with defining euthanasia and the two different type of euthanasia. Euthanasia is, “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy” (Merriam-Webster, 2012). There are two different types of euthanasia. Type one is active euthanasia; active euthanasia is, “the practice of injecting a patient with a lethal dose of medication with the primary intention of ending a patient’s life, at the patient’s request” (Medical-Dictionary.com, 2012). The second type of euthanasia is passive euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is, “the ending of life by the deliberate withholding of drugs or other life-sustaining treatment” (Medical-Dictionary.com, 2012) Active euthanasia would be closer to the actual act of assisted suicide, because it requires the help of others to inject something lethal into another’s system. Passive euthanasia would be a doctor following a person’s request for example if they had a living will or a do not resuscitate order (DNR).…
- 1922 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Euthanasia is defined as the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. There are 3 types of euthanasia – voluntary euthanasia, non-voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia, which could also be known as assisted suicide, refers to a situation where the patient actively takes the last step in their death by giving permission or consent or actually requesting to medical officers to end their lives for them. Non voluntary euthanasia is a situation where the patient in unable to consent while involuntary euthanasia is equated to murder as it is where the euthanasia being held is against the person’s will. Non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia is illegal in all countries where as voluntary euthanasia is legal in only a few countries which are Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Switzerland, U.S states of Oregon and Washington.…
- 638 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is from a Greek word (εὐθανασία) meaning "good death" where εὖ, eu (well or good) and thanatos (death) refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to be relieved from pain and suffering. Euthanasia is categorized in three different ways, which include voluntary euthanasia, non-voluntary euthanasia, or involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is legal in some countries and U.S. states. Non-voluntary euthanasia is illegal in all countries. However, in the Netherlands, physicians can avoid prosecution by following well described and strict conditions. These conditions include patient request, taking into consideration the amount of suffering the patient is experiencing, alternative courses of action must be discussed and pursued, all available information must be presented to the patient. Involuntary euthanasia is usually considered murder.…
- 2009 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays