For my topic I have chosen Euthanasia because it’s an important issue today because a lot of terminally ill people want euthanasia as they don't want to endure the pain. Also a lot of people think that no one, no matter what circumstances should have a right or the power to take someone’s life away because you have to take into consideration how it would affect the family's of those who wish to do euthanasia and also how it would affect health care on those that do not have a terminal illness. Although many people think that it is a very good idea that they will end pointless sufferings for the terminally ill they need to see how it would affect everything from families to health care and how it will affect normal people as well.
One of my main arguments against Euthanasia is religious people think it's wrong because the bible tells them not to kill, and they believe that only God can take life away. Also it could just lead to abuse by doctors, but legal voluntary Euthanasia could just open the way for non-voluntary Euthanasia. That would mean doctors could decide that a patient’s life is basically not worth wasting their time on, and just use euthanasia on them. It has already happened before in the Netherlands in the 1990’s when the law was relatively new, but over a thousand people had died of non-voluntary Euthanasia. A lot of people were also worried that if it were to be legalised in the UK in the same way as the Netherlands, double the amount of people would lose their life.
Another one of my main argument against Euthanasiais if it legalised the terminally ill and sick treatment would not be as good because doctors would just use euthanasia to just get them out of the way. But many patients who feel that they have no purpose in life or are a burden to their families can just lead them to wanting to take the easy way out.
The hospice cares for the patients and their families a lot too.There is also an addition to these arguments because the fact there is alternative treatments which are available such as a palliative care and hospices. They do not kill the patients, they just make sure that their last months or year is comfortable and as painless as possible to make the person forget they are going to die. This lets the family of their patients have more time with their loved ones and make sure that their last moments are the best they ever had.
Euthanasia could never really be controlled and this point is actually proven. A study indicated that 2010, 23 per cent of all Euthanasia deaths had gone unreported in the Netherlands. This made an increase from 20 per cent in 2005. Also the study showed that the Netherlands were really struggling to control the amount of Euthanasia that was being used, and who says this couldn’t happen to the rest of the world.
Another argument against Euthanasia, would that doctors be might make a mistake about someone’s diagnosis. This could lead to the person choosing Euthanasia after being wrongly told that they have a terminally ill condition, meaning they basically have died for no reason. This could also lead to the doctor feeling guilty for taking someone's life who did not have to die. Another argument for Euthanasia is the pragmatic argument as people believe Euthanasia is already a big wide spread practice, and it is just that some people are not willing to admit it. But they also believe Euthanasia would be perfectly fine if regulated. An example would be that people could refuse treatment if their heart fails, so many people feel the exact same as Euthanasia but in a different form.
The ethical argument basically suggests that life should only continue as long as a person feels their life is worth living. An example would be that if someone who supports the use of Euthanasia based on the ethical argument could possibly believe that a person should be able to choose to end their life now and if they were living in so much pain and their quality of life is not want they want it all to end rather than have to bare the pain day in day out.
I am fully against Euthanasia because I hold the same view as the religious groups that it’s not our place to take human life away, and that we should just let them die of natural causes. In conclusion, the negatives outweigh the positives because arguments like this could never really be controlled. The topic is so controversial because both sides have strong arguments. Although the positives suggest it would help a person end needless sufferings and they would be able to die peacefully, I defiantly say that the negatives are the strongest because they are looking at euthanasia from all aspects and not just how it would affect the person with a terminal illness but how it would have a ripple affect on everyone's life - not just the dying person.
858 words
Sources ethical argument – that people should have freedom of choice, including the right to control their own body and life (as long as they do not abuse any other person’s rights), and that the state should not create laws that prevent people being able to choose when and how they die pragmatic argument – that euthanasia, particularly passive euthanasia, is allegedly already a widespread practice, just not one that people are willing to admit to, so it is better to regulate euthanasia properly
religious argument – that these practices can never be justified for religious reasons; for example, many people believe that only God has the right to end a human life
‘slippery slope’ argument – this is based on the concern that legalising euthanasia could lead to significant unintended changes in our healthcare system and society at large that we would later come to regret medical ethics argument – that asking doctors, nurses or any other healthcare professional to carry out euthanasia or assist in a suicide would be a violation of fundamental medical ethics alternative argument – that there is no reason for a person to suffer either mentally or physically because effective end of life treatments are available; therefore, euthanasia is not a valid treatment option, but represents a failure on the part of the doctor involved in a person’s care
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The main argument for euthanasia to be legal is that many people believe that everyone should have the right to decide when they want to die. Many argue that because we can determine the course of our lives by our own free will, we have the right to live our lives and determine our own course. It then follows that we also have as human beings, the fundamental right to determine how we die. The argument of people who are very anti-euthanasia is that euthanasia is immoral because life must be preserved and protected. For something to be immoral, it would have to violate moral laws or norms. The preservation of life is, however, the decision of the patient who has full control and not the physician.…
- 350 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Euthanasia should be legalized to allow terminally ill patients the opportunity to prepare for their deaths, avoid unnecessary pain and die with dignity. Euthanasia is “the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment.” (Am. Heritage) The literal meaning of the word euthanasia, "‘an easy or happy death,’ from the Greek word eu- ‘good’, and thanatos ‘death’"(Harper), is proof in itself that the whole idea is to help people and not to belittle the value of life. The fact that suffering animals can be put out of their misery, but suffering people are forced to stay alive and endure the pain, is inhumane. Legalizing euthanasia would be no more than an act of mercy allowing medical personnel to bring slow, painful deaths to a halt.…
- 985 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Terminal illnesses cause great pain and suffering. For example here are some words from Andy Whelan, “...we as parents could offer no comfort - Jessica pushing us away as she rode out her searing pain in solitude...her body stiffened and her face contorted in pain.” (Zhang). Mrs. Whelan’s daughter Jessica Whelan was only four years old when she was diagnosed. Jessica had a form of cancer called neuroblastoma and had been fighting cancer for 13 months. In November she was given just a few weeks to live and later died due to cancer. Patients should be allowed to have doctor-assisted suicides because they should have the right to die and end their suffering, but some people are against the legalization because they believe they will make the…
- 675 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The concept and practice of physician assisted suicide is a highly debated topic in today’s news. People often question the morals of the physicians who practice euthanasia and there are some who believe that they should not even be considered doctors. Euthanasia is the ending of someone's life through a doctor's help and is still illegal in most countries. One of the most well known advocates for the practice of euthanasia is Jack Kevorkian, who has also been referred to as Dr. Death. He was tried and convicted of second degree murder, however his practice gained a lot of support from the publicity of his trials. Although he is responsible for over 130 deaths, Kevorkian is a hero in today’s standards because of his involvement in the practice…
- 1044 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This argument needs to be settled so people can either go through the process or not even have the option. If patients cannot obtain euthanasia then there needs to be more ways that will ensure patients less pain and suffering for them. IN the future, hopefully the Unites States will legalize euthanasia or find a better alternative than euthanasia that will allow patients to die with dignity. People of the United States and all over the world cannot live in fear of what might be right or might be wrong, chances need to be taken to understand and develop more. To end with is a quotes from “Doctor Death, Jack Kevorkian, and “My ultimate aim is to make euthanasia a positive experience.” (Euthanasia…
- 1193 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
There are several reasons why Euthanasia is wrong. I’m just going to name a few. First is because it doesn’t just effect the person choosing it, it also effects the family of the person choosing assisted suicide . Also another reason that euthanasia is wrong is because if you do choose assisted suicide you never know what’s going to happen after that moment. For all that you know it could get a whole lot better than what you are at that moment. The last but definitely not least is that Euthanasia denies the patients the final stage of growth.…
- 443 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The alternatives to euthanasia that people end up using/doing are horrifying. By refusing people the right to end their own lives, we’re increasing that pain and indignity to a such a horrifying extent. There are multiple cases of human beings that have tried taking their lives in other ways, such as starvation, because they were denied this painless death. If humans really want to end their lives, they will and sometimes in the most horrific, most painful ways, so they might as well have a painless option. They deserve to die painlessly with their dignity and self-respect still in…
- 905 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Imagine that you have come down with a disease and you have just been told that there is no cure. There in your hospital bed all you can think about is the pain and the agony you are going to have to endure for the rest of your remaining life. I for one know that I do not want to spend my last times on this earth in pain and discomfort, knowing that I will never walk again, or feed myself, or maybe ever even come back to consciousness. For years, doctors have been prohibited from helping patients to take their own lives. I believe that a terminally ill patient should have the right to decide if they have had enough. By legalizing euthanasia, also referred to as physician assisted suicide, tremendous pain and suffering of patients can be saved. The right to die should be a fundamental freedom to each person. Patients should have to right to die with their dignity intact rather than have their illness leave them as merely a shell of their former selves. These are just a few of the reasons as to why every individual should have the right to die if they are terminally ill.…
- 1879 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia has continually been a heated debate and there are reasons that it should and shouldn’t be legalized. The Oxford English Dictionary states that euthanasia is a gentle and easy death (Oxford English Dictionary). According to the Oxford English Dictionary, active euthanasia is the ending of a terminally ill person's life by direct intervention, such as administering a lethal dose of painkilling drug (Oxford English Dictionary). While passive euthanasia according to the Oxford English Dictionary is the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment in the knowledge that the person concerned will die (Oxford English Dictionary). Len Doyal, the author of “ Why active euthanasia and physician assisted suicide should…
- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
First off there are only three places in the world where euthanasia is legal. Oregon where they permit assisted suicide the Netherlands, and Belgium who both permit euthanasia and assisted suicide. The difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide is that if a third party performs the last act that intentionally causes a patient’s death, euthanasia has occurred. And if the person who dies performs the last act, assisted suicide has taken place. Some of the major arguments for euthanasia are Euthanasia would not only be for people who are terminally ill. There are two problems here; there are many definitions for the word terminal. For example, when Dr. Kevorkian spoke to the National Press Club in 1992, he said that a terminal illness was "any disease that curtails life even for a day." Some laws define "terminal" as death occurring in a "relatively short time." Even where a life expectancy like six months is referred to, experts recognize that it is virtually impossible to predict the life expectancy of a patient. Another major argument against euthanasia by religious groups…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Have you ever seen anyone who lives forever? It is impossible. Everyone in this world has to die including animals and plants. Death is a part of life. Why cannot patients who are terminal ill choose death for themselves? Euthanasia is a good choice for them. Euthanasia is the practice of ending a life in a painless manner. Some forms of euthanasia are legal in Belgium, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Switzerland, some states in the U.S.A. including Oregon and Washington, the Autonomous Community of Andalusia (Spain), and Thailand (2009, para 1). Euthanasia should be legalized worldwide because of these following reasons: Euthanasia helps end the patient’s unbearable suffering, according to human rights terminally ill patients have right to die, and it frees family from suffering feeling and financial problems.…
- 897 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What would you prefer, a good but slightly shorter life, or a longer life full of hospitals and machines? What should the quality of our lives measured in, the years we lived or how we lived them? By choosing euthanasia, patients are not choosing death itself, as contradictory as it may seem.…
- 378 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The moral argument for euthanasia is most often the argument that voluntary active euthanasia should be legal. In a case when a patient has no possible road to recovery from their terminal illness, is suffering from their condition, and is still mentally capable of making justified decisions, the request to terminate their life should not be denied. Euthanasia is also a way to remove suffering in both voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. In the case of non-voluntary euthanasia, it would be sparing their suffering in the outcome that they do regain a conscious state, but with a low quality of life. In the case of a family member going through this situation, most people would want to see their relative free of pain, even if it means the end of their life. The cost of healthcare can also greatly impact cases, proving a beneficial reason for the use of euthanasia. Many physicians due to their obligations in the medical field will keep a patient alive as long as possible, causing the cost of being terminally ill to skyrocket. The legalization of assisted suicide/euthanasia could prevent the financial problems that come with being terminally ill. Those that are terminally ill more than likely need to take a leave from work severely cutting their income, while having their expenses rise at a rapid rate to due variations of medical treatment. Figure 2 shows a chart of how terminally ill patients effect their family…
- 864 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A reason to choose euthanasia is because the patient is suffering. If a patient is suffering from an incurable illness and has the opportunity to decide if euthanasia is the right option, the family should respect his or her decision. Many patients that would look at this option are suffering from illnesses like cancer or paralysis that are very painful and traumatic. Sometimes when there is not cure someone, it can be better to practice euthanasia.…
- 435 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays