Preview

Euthanasia In Australia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1254 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia In Australia
Euthanasia is often a controversial topic around all areas of the world. The idea of ‘assisted suicide’ has sparked debates and many countries, including Australia, are still hesitant or reluctant in allowing legislation for legalising Euthanasia to pass. This inquiry will aim to provide sufficient evidence as to why and how Euthanasia should become legalised while also evaluating and examining other cases and laws in other states regarding this topic.
To clarify first, there are, in fact, three different types of Euthanasia. These are Voluntary, Non-Voluntary and Involuntary. Voluntary Euthanasia refers to assisted suicide performed with the patient’s consent. Non-Voluntary Euthanasia refers to a patient that could not give consent (such as a comatose or minor patient). Involuntary Euthanasia is assisted suicide on an individual that did not give consent or was against their
…show more content…
For every person that dismisses Euthanasia, there will no doubt be those who advocates for it, with their own arguments too. Most commonly, allowing for an individual to be in great pain until their ultimate demise is often argued as crueler and more inhuman than letting them pass away quietly and peacefully. Enforcing the illegality of euthanasia is also very difficult for numerous reasons. Firstly, as mentioned before, there are certain areas in the world that allows for euthanasia, and the laws of Australia have no jurisdictions in areas such as the Netherlands. The current laws are also too ambiguous to enforce, and thus, goes against what makes a ‘good’ law. For example, if family members were to suggest and encourage a terminally ill person to end their own lives without directly contributing, could it be counted as euthanasia in the current laws? In a democratic society such as Australia, banning euthanasia goes against its system, as in a 2015 survey of 34,000 NSW voters, 72% of the people were for the prospect of Euthanasia

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The word Euthanasia derives from the Greek words Eu and Thanatos which means easy or good death. Euthanasia is is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma[1]. Euthanasia exists in various forms, each one specific in its criteria. Firstly there is active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves the use of direct action in order to end the patient’s life whilst passive euthanasia is the withholding of medical aid in order to allow the patient to die naturally such as not performing life-extending surgery or turning off a life support system. The next distinction is between Voluntary and Involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia involves the patient’s termination at their own request whilst involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient is unable to ably make a decision and therefore a suitable person makes the decision for them. Indirect euthanasia involves treating the patients pain but with the side effect of death, the primary intention is often used to justify the outcome. This is often referred to as the doctrine of double effect and in reality is not considered euthanasia given that the real purpose of the treatment is pain relief and death is merely seen as the side-affect. Finally there is assisted suicide which involves a patient incapable of committing suicide themselves asks for assistance in doing so. Euthanasia is a controversial topic that contradicts the age old moral injunction “thou shalt not kill”[2]. But similarly denying patient’s of this choice is defying medical practice cornerstones such as the patient’s autonomy and promoting their best interests. Different countries hold varying stances on Euthanasia but it is currently illegal in the UK. Most recently the case of Tony Nicklinson, a man totally paralysed by locked-in syndrome requesting euthanasia, has come to the forefront of the debate. Given the right to take his case to…

    • 5500 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia means gentle or easy death for those who are incurably ill and in pain. So should a person have the right to take another person 's life or his own when he or she is incurably ill and in pain? That is Australia is trying to decide. The N.T already has passed a law that legalizes euthanasia in that state. Now other government leaders and members are in support of this are pushing for an Australian euthanasia law. Christian Groups and Anti-Euthanasia have seen euthanasia as a sin and a choice that no-body should make. Some doctors have taken ill patients life 's as a request from the patient should this now be openly done. Would you want to be kept alive, with little hope ahead, when you were in pain? Some might answer no, and those people should deserve the choice to end it when that pain becomes unbearable.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    <br>Euthanasia is often confused with physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia is when one person does something that directly kills another. For example, a doctor gives a lethal injection to a patient. In assisted suicide, a non-suicidal person knowingly and intentionally provides the means or acts in some way to help a suicidal person kill himself or herself. For example, a doctor writes a prescription for poison, or someone hooks up a face mask and tubing to a canister of carbon monoxide and then instructs the suicidal person on how to push a lever so that she'll be gassed to death. For all practical purposes, any distinction between euthanasia and assisted suicide has been abandoned today.…

    • 2774 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia is a widely debated and controversial topic in our society. It is believed that the principle of PAS and euthanasia portrays, “merciful acts that deliver terminally ill patients from painful and protracted death” (page 477, column 2). In the paper, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Tragic View,” John D. Arras discusses the subject and states that while he agrees with patients making decisions, implementing laws supporting PAS and euthanasia is a huge threat to our social order. However, John D. Arras also concludes that he does not disapprove with the possibility of having a legislative policy in favor of PAS/euthanasia, only if there is “sufficient evidence of reliability of various safeguards” (page 477, column 2).…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia advocates Patients are constantly receiving criticism from those who believe that euthanasia is not ethical and should be illegal everywhere. Euthanasia can be defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The practice of euthanasia is illegal in most countries. Euthanasia can be either voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when the patient requests to die. Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient is either unconscious or unable to make a choice regarding their death and an appropriate person makes this decision for them. Involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient wishes to live but is killed anyway and is considered murder. There are different…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for "good death." It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the deferment of medical treatment (Munson, 2012, p. 578). Many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering. Euthanasia has been a long-standing ethical debate for decades in the United States. Active euthanasia is only legal in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and in the United States in the states of Washington, Oregon and Montana (Angell). Several surveys indicate that roughly two thirds of the American public now support physician-assisted suicide, and more than half the doctors in the United States do too (Angell). Active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia matter because they allow the patient or family to relieve them of pain and suffering, and to die with dignity and respect. In this paper I will argue that it is immoral and unethical to deny a patient the right to die and that active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia should be a legal practice in the United States.…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who are terminally ill and in a lot of pain often desperately want to end there life and do it in horrifying ways. Many starve themselves to death just so that they can stop the pain. Doctors and family members are frequently being charged due to helping a patient or family member end their life. This could all be solved if euthanasia was legalised. So why hasn't it happened? Why are so many people lives being damaged? Australia is yet to legalised euthanasia due to vulnerability concerns. They are worried that people will feel as though they are a burden and will ask to end there life. Or that doctors will take advantage of there power. This can easily be solved by providing qualified, independent third parties that will check whether the request is genuinely voluntary or is feeling pressured into making the decision. If euthanasia were to be legalised it would stop many people from ending there life's in dangerous…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around 3 quarters are in favour of doctors giving or practicing euthanasia if requested by a terminally ill patient who is experiencing unbearable pain. This is backed by a survey which took place in an Australian tabloid, where around 74% of Australians believed it should be legalised, and a further 8% were undecided. From this survey it’s stated by the public that voluntary euthanasia is supported and should be legalised for practise. The facts are literally in front of us, and is therefore hard to understand why euthanasia is frowned upon and criticised.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word 'euthanasia' comes from the Greek words 'eu' and 'thanatos', together translating as 'good death'. The Oxford Concise Medical Dictionary defines euthanasia as the 'act of taking life to relieve suffering'. In practice euthanasia proves to be far more complex, as it comes in a variety of forms. Passive euthanasia is the deliberate withdrawal of treatment and nourishment for the terminally ill patient. Active euthanasia is on the authority or for the best interests of the patient who perhaps is unable to speak for him or herself. For example, a hospital could decide when to take someone off a life support machine. Voluntary euthanasia is when the patient makes a request to have their life terminated, through the administration of a drug or other means. There is also involuntary euthanasia, which is when a life is taken away without and individual's consent and against their will and is one of the many causes for the sensitivity and distress surrounding this matter.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Euthanasia is defined by the Oxford Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 2013) as “the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” The word euthanasia originates from the Greek words, “eu” meaning good, and “thantos” meaning death, however the topic of this type of “good death” has become highly debatable in Australia. Sometimes referred to as “assisted suicide” and “mercy killing,” euthanasia gives people their own right to die through painless suicide, however done so at their own free will, making it voluntary. Once legalised in the Northern Territory for nine months under the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995, euthanasia is…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In essence, we are autonomous people with a right to self-sufficiency, independence and to self-regulation, so why should we not have the right to choose whether or not our lives should end if there is little or no hope of recovery? Even health professionals in Australia must treat in accordance with the patient. It is hard to put your feet in the shoes of these patients. They are suffering, and quiet literally dying. If the inevitable is near-future death, why not end it now and take the emotional and physical stress off the patient and their loved ones. Some opposing the idea may say if euthanasia is allowed, it can easily be abused. Of course, the legal system must be designed to not permit the misuse of the law. Before a patient is even offered euthanasia, his or her mental stability must be considered, that is, is the patient competent enough to make a sound decision? Also financial and domestic problems of the patient must be taken into account by the board of professionals regulating euthanasia in our health system. In 2009 Newspoll discovered a huge 85% of Australians support euthanasia. 85% believe that people have the right to choose voluntary, quiet death when in immense suffering.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voluntary euthanasia is what we think of as regular euthanasia. This is assisting in someone dying at their request. Non-voluntary euthanasia is when the person is unable to consent or ask for help in their death and is what I would consider the grey area around euthanasia as it could be exploited to end a life that perhaps didn’t want to end or would have pulled through. Finally, involuntary euthanasia is what we would refer to as murder or homicide it is the when a human being is killed against their wishes. I strongly believe that the consensual and painless process of voluntary euthanasia should be legal to allow those suffering from illness to pass…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia or assisted suicide has always been a controversial topic for social policy. Although the terms are used interchangeably, they are different by definition and are treated differently by law. Some define euthanasia as a process to end a life, sometimes involving the participation of medical personnel, while assisted suicide requires active participation and consent from the patient. Although the end results are the same, there are different dynamics to this controversial process.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia may be classified according to whether a person gives informed consent into three types: voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary.…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia or “mercy killing/death” as it may be referred to as has become more complex as the centuries go on; there are three specific forms of Euthanasia. There is Voluntary, Involuntary, and Nonvoluntary euthanasia. Voluntary Euthanasia is when someone other than the patient intentionally terminates the patient’s life. The term Mercy Death can be applied to this type of Active Euthanasia because the patient is giving voluntary consent; such as a “living will’ or communicating verbally. A “living will” is a written document that the patient who is terminally ill instructs anybody to take his/her own life.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics