The explanation of social facts lies in society itself. There are two types of ways to explain this; the first method involves determining the cause of a social fact, seeking to explain its origin. In Durkheim’s view, the determining cause of a social fact should be required among the states of individual consciousness. Moreover, the explanations of social facts also involve an analysis of its function in society, its contribution to the general needs of the social organism and its function in the establishment of social order. Durkheim made two main distinctions between social facts--material and nonmaterial social facts. Material social facts, he explained, have to do with the physical social structures which exert influence on the individual. It is something that can be touched, evolving because of society's shared belief that it serves a purpose. Nonmaterial social facts are the values, norms and other conceptually held beliefs. Social facts continue in existence because they contribute in some way to the maintenance of society, because they serve ‘some social end.’
Most of Durkheim’s work is concerned with functional analysis that seeks to understand the functions of social facts. He assumes that society has certain functional prerequisites, the most important of which is the need for social order. Social order is needed because of human nature and Durkheim had a homo duplex of this human nature, that is the believe that humans have two sides to their nature. One side is the selfish and the egoistical. Selfish biological needs are those like the need to satisfy hunger, so basically they look after their own needs. The other side of the human nature is the ability to believe in moral values. This is useful to make social life possible. Another thing that has to do with selfishness is anomie. Anomie is a normlessness situation where an individual is only concerned with himself in society. This is a type of individualism. This anomic situation will result in a society that lacks norms and does whatever one likes.
To continue with the topic of social facts, Durkheim studied social facts with the relation to suicide. Durkheim believed that the suicide grade was determined by the relationship between individuals and society. He found four different types of suicide which are Altruistic, Egoistic, Fatalistic and Anomic suicide. Altruistic suicide takes place when an individual is so integrated in society that they sacrifice their own life out of a sense of duty to others. Egoistic suicide is resulted from individuals being insufficiently regulated into the social group that they do not feel a sense of belonging. Fatalistic suicide is when society restricts the individuals too much for example the slaves because they have no freedom and lastly, anomic suicide is when society does not regulate the individual sufficiently that when traditional norms and values come disrupted, society’s guidelines becomes increasingly unclear.
In conclusion, Durkheim argues that society has a reality of its own over and above the individual who comprise it. Beliefs and moral codes are passed on from one generation to the next which are shared by the individuals who make up society. So therefore, it is not the consciousness of the individual that direct behaviour but common beliefs and sentiments that transcend the individual that shape his/ her consciousness.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Functionalism is a consensus theory which is based on the theory that society is based on agreement among members of society regarding values, goals and rules in society. Key ideas of functionalism can be traced back to its founder, Emile Durkheim, who introduced concepts such as social facts and the collective conscience to Sociology. Durkheim used the concept of social facts during his study of suicide to describe how society controls the individual. He believed that the level of external constraint within society shaped individuals behaviour; in this case making members of society commit suicide. Examples of social facts defined by Durkheim are money, law and language. Durkheim believes that social facts such as these are objective (cannot be measured), external (exist before and beyond us), and constraining (they place limits on our actions). Furthermore, Durkheim also introduced the concept of the collective conscience – he believed that changes in modern society were weakening social solidarity and therefore we need institutions to act together to prevent a state of anomie.…
- 1195 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Durkheim believed that society will evolve until it reaches modernity but thinks that sharing traditional values and beliefs won’t lead to a modern state. Along with Tonnies and Huntington, Durkheim believes that in order to evolve, poorer and developing counties have to replace community with individualism. They believe in cultural imperialism and that the only way to modernize these countries is through democracy and capitalism.…
- 757 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Perspective of the Functionalist Theory: Durkheim believed in social facts which are the institutions in a society. Durkheim…
- 251 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Emile Durkheim was a key sociological thinker of the 19th century. He was one of the first people to try and explain and understand society as a whole by looking at all the different parts of society. He studied the ways in which society was held together through moral and social bonds. This came to be known as ‘functionalism’. It was a word used to describe a complicated system in which different pieces fit together to form a stable and structured society.…
- 1548 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Durkheim lived from 1858 – 1917, and was a key actor both in the foundation of sociology, social science and, as is contextually synonymous, in the…
- 1696 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In Durkheim’s view, modern societies the rules governing behaviour become weaker and less clear-cut. This is because modern societies have a complex, specialised division of labour, which leads to individuals increasingly different from one another. This means that the shared culture or collective conscience is weakened, and this results in higher levels of crime and deviance…
- 1074 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Durkheim’s (1897) argument is extremely outdated, being almost 120 years old. This means that some of his views aren’t applicable to today’s society - his ideas were based on pre-industrial societies where people often lived in extended or nuclear families, whereas today’s society is based on modern industrial society where not many people continue to live in nuclear families anymore. He argues that our behaviour is caused by social facts such as social integration and moral regulation and that the suicide rate is also a social fact. He…
- 1624 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
David Emile Durkheim was a French theorist who wanted to create an ideal of sociology based on the idea that society is an unbiased and limiting material reality, independent to the individual. According to Durkheim, the division of labor is basically a significant source of social solidarity dating back to the foundation of life that links together and affects civil, economic, educational, and legal processes. This new…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After reading Chapter Three of the text, Introduction to Sociology and the article, Durkheim’s Classic Contribution, consider the following question, why do you think Emile Durkheim allege that if we didn’t have deviants, we would create them? Support your answer with detailed examples. Within the context of the functionalist perspective, Durkheim made a real interesting point. You must have deviants in society in order for society to know where or what their values and norms will tolerate. If not then how can a society put laws in place or determine the rules. It also reaffirms the existing values and norms (Vissing, 2011). From my perspective, It's a chicken or the egg conundrum. If not one single person ever committed assault in a society…
- 322 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Durkheim suggests that there is a purpose to the existence of all social phenomena, the necessary purpose of deviance being to bond the social group. This is difficult to imagine because it treats society as a living thing, an object which forces individuals to follow, like sheep or robots, the wider social pattern 2. His influence on sociology has been immense and even those who disagree with him have generally fallen into dialogue with his views. 3. He does not explain why certain people are more likely to commit crimes than others. 4. It is difficult to test the theory of crime. It seems to be a ‘have your cake and eat it theory’, where crime may invalidate the functionalist claims of social stability, but it seen to ‘really’ function to create such stability by showing people how not to behave. Thus functionalists are able to ‘prove’ stability in life, even where conflict is shown to exist 5. He seems to ignore the concept of power. It is generally accepted that in all societies some groups have greater ability than the bulk of the population to influence the law making process. 6. Functionalism fails to provide an answer to the question ‘Functional for whom?’. 7. Durkheim’s work was perhaps the first to analyse deviance in terms of a broad sociological theory. Resources Used Heavily…
- 3090 Words
- 13 Pages
Better Essays -
The approach Durkheim used most often was positivist sociology. This sociology is used based on the fact that there is an objective reality that exists. This method likes to have things to actually measure and usually done in a lab. They have to define the concepts for their experiments and out into place what variables and controls they will use. Most sociologists that use this method go for the cause and effect aspect of society. These sociologists try putting aside their beliefs and attitudes to keep them from interfering with their results which is called objectivity (34). The limitations to this method are:…
- 586 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
He has often been accused of having anoverly anti-individualistic philosophy, one that is mainly concerned with the taming of individual impulse and the harnessing of the energies of individuals for the purposes of society. Although it cannot be denied that there are such tendencies in his work, Durkheim's treatmen tof altruistic suicide indicates that he was trying to establish a balance between the claims of individuals and those of society, ratherthan to suppress individual strivings. Acutely aware of the dangers ofthe breakdown of social order, he also realized that total control of component social actors by society would be as detrimental as anomie andde-regulation. Throughout his life he attempted to establish a balance between societal and individual…
- 1893 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
His aim of his research was to establish causal explanations of social behaviour and the functions of social facts also know as causes and effects. He thought social facts, collective ways of acting that exist outside of individuals, could exert obligations on individuals, determining their actions. Examples of Durkheim’s work include his study on suicide, functional analysis of the division of labour which he argues can be seen within the education system, School creates a social division of labor, it gives certain pupils certain skills to get certain jobs, it does this by offering both academic and vocational courses at various levels which require different skills and talents, this contributes to value consensus as it ensures that everybody is working and all types of jobs are fulfilled in society so people are able to support their families but most importantly keeping the economy…
- 1172 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
According to Emile Durkheim, The “coercive power” of social facts raised in The Rules of Sociological Method: crime is a nessecity because, “a society exempt from crime is utterly impossible, it is impossible to all be alike (Appelrouth & Edles, 94).” Durkheim argues that crime is inevitable or “normal” in all…
- 932 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The functionalist perspective is embedded in the work of Emile Durkheim (1858-1917). It gives us the view of society as an organism in which each part functions in a certain way to ensure the stability of the whole. "Durkheim explained that society was held together by a…
- 590 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays