Preview

Evaluating Sources Checkpoint

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evaluating Sources Checkpoint
Axia College Material
Appendix B

Web Source Evaluation 1. What is your expository essay topic? _Tattoos and the Tattoos_____________________________________________________

______ 2. Provide the URL of the Web site: http://www.google.com 3. Provide the name of Web site: google.com 4. Primary use: XEducational XCommercial Other 5. What is the purpose or goal of this Web site? __To give me certain bits on information I need for my essay.__________________________________________ 6. What organization or individual created this site? Larry Page and Sergey Brin ___________________ 7. Does this organization or individual have affiliations that might create a built-in bias toward the information? Explain your answer. No this website have various opinions and just pulls up information from all over the world and different websites.

What other references are cited for the information presented? _Other websites that are provided through google.com._____________________________ 8. What other types of organizations are linked to this site? (Using the Google search engine, type link: and the Web site address [for example, link:www.Website.com].) Any website you go to has a search engine on it google is a website that is just a search engine itself. 9. Who is the author of the page? Does that person have valid credentials to present this information? Explain your answer. 10. Can you provide feedback on the Web site and create an exchange with the author or Web site manager? No I don't believe so since it's just a search engine website. 11. When was the material on the Web site copyrighted? _____2006________ When was the material updated? ___2010_______ 12. How helpful is this site to you?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    There are really no indications that the site is trustworthy. There are no certifications or any other sources that might indicate the site could be trusted.…

    • 1447 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | | | |Daily Kos: no | | | |Indicate whether each website is credible. | | | |POLITICO: no | | | |Indicate whether each website is credible.…

    • 478 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This source is legitimate because the information is up to date until 2009 and has an author. Also there are very few ads and the sponsor is popular for their knowledge. There is also a contact information, if you have any comments or anything to correct.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Google is a very robust search engine that is highly adjustable to meet everyone’s needs. You can search by website, image, map or other file type. It gives you millions of results and ranks those results according to relevance and page rank.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think the writer of this piece wrote it because they wanted to make a nice website to help people. I think I can trust this website.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If the information seems to be just someone’s view or opinion then it should be checked and never assume it is right just because it’s been written by someone in a highly respected profession.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evaluation of the CMS.gov website will determine if the information provided comes from a responsible source without…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    CDC Credibility paper

    • 1141 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The next area in evaluating the credibility of a website is the “why” or “when” which refers to the objectivity of the website. “If your page provides accurate information with limited advertising and it is objective in presenting the…

    • 1141 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is your opinion of the technological tools provided by Axia College, including audio appendixes, digital stories, and tutorials? Why do you feel this way?…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Junk Science

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although this article list who are the writers of this article, it does not give any information if either student has received a degree in the information that they are discussing. It does not include what company or organization that is supporting the author. The sources that they listed are not credible. The article does not state whether this information has been reviewed nor verified by any expert, but only claims from a book, articles, and you tube videos.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Has there been cited information within the document that we are reviewing (Montecino, Virginia, August 1998).…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the internet is where we get most of our information, it is important to examine the source of the information and ensure factual evidence and not the author’s point of view. In evaluating the credibility of internet sources, one must examine whether information is a fact or the author’s opinion. Does it contain original information or simply just links? Is the…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Usining Sources 2

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A good way to evaluate a source is to look at where the source is coming from and who the audience is. Looking at things like, Is the information political? Then…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Review Essay on ADHD

    • 1172 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Each criterion used causes the reader to look at the website in its entirety and based upon each criterion selected, evaluate whether or not the website meets that criterion. The criterion used to evaluate Mayoclinic.org was: Accuracy, Authority, Objectivity, Currency and Coverage. Accuracy means to determine how reliable and free from error the information contained on a website is, remember to look at who is hosting the site. Is it a University, a government, a professional association, a commercial host, an advocacy group, a publisher? What are their biases? A good website should state its purpose and intended audience. Authority means who authored this page or information? To determine the authorship of a website, examine the…

    • 1172 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source Criticism

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The source’s top level domain is .com, which means the owners geographical position is unknown, as well as that the site is most likely not an organization. According to the site the owners are two retired persons Don and Elizabeth Kiel, now according to the site living at “a wonderful retirement community. No information to go on to decide if these two are authorized to write about history, (Don was a match teacher at CAU) However the only contact information they leave are Don’s inactive Facebook page. Which shows that if they post false or distorted information you cannot directly contact them, and they do not need to stand for what information they post on the internet.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays