Evaluation Research Methods
Evaluation
1.) Did I manage to fulfil all my objectives?
Did I get enough information for all the objectives and can I back it up with evidence.
2.) Did I interpret the interviews well?
The validity of my interview is good because I interviewed two people and also the validity of my questionnaire isn’t good because I did a small sample size.
My questionnaire is reliable because…
My whole research is reliable because….
3.) How well have I performed? It was like a roller coaster. There were times where I just couldn’t get it right such as; when I had to do my deontological and teleological theory, I kept getting them both muddled up.
How did my hypothesis go? When developing it, I found it hard because…..
The pilot study was good because…. I did my questionnaire well because….
4.) What would you do differently and why?
I would be more organised ……
Research more on deontological and teleological theory more and know the differences
5.) What have you learned about conducting research and writing up a field study/investigation and how useful it has been?
I have learnt the Harvard system and I now know why research is important.
I know how certain questions could be offensive and some could be sensitive.
Strengths
My strength was the qualitative data and the secondary data. This is because had background information and general knowledge. This all helped me build my primary data.
We did a pilot study for the questionnaire. I did this to improve the validity and it showed whether everyone understood the questions and made sure that it wasn’t offensive.
Limitation
I was a lone researcher, who was inexperienced and had time constraint. All this affected the validity of my whole research. All these have affected my choices in my research such as; the various methods I can and cannot use. However there was also limitation to my research. There was not many resources and secondary research for me to use. When looking for journals related to my hypothesis,
1.) Did I manage to fulfil all my objectives?
Did I get enough information for all the objectives and can I back it up with evidence.
2.) Did I interpret the interviews well?
The validity of my interview is good because I interviewed two people and also the validity of my questionnaire isn’t good because I did a small sample size.
My questionnaire is reliable because…
My whole research is reliable because….
3.) How well have I performed? It was like a roller coaster. There were times where I just couldn’t get it right such as; when I had to do my deontological and teleological theory, I kept getting them both muddled up.
How did my hypothesis go? When developing it, I found it hard because…..
The pilot study was good because…. I did my questionnaire well because….
4.) What would you do differently and why?
I would be more organised ……
Research more on deontological and teleological theory more and know the differences
5.) What have you learned about conducting research and writing up a field study/investigation and how useful it has been?
I have learnt the Harvard system and I now know why research is important.
I know how certain questions could be offensive and some could be sensitive.
Strengths
My strength was the qualitative data and the secondary data. This is because had background information and general knowledge. This all helped me build my primary data.
We did a pilot study for the questionnaire. I did this to improve the validity and it showed whether everyone understood the questions and made sure that it wasn’t offensive.
Limitation
I was a lone researcher, who was inexperienced and had time constraint. All this affected the validity of my whole research. All these have affected my choices in my research such as; the various methods I can and cannot use. However there was also limitation to my research. There was not many resources and secondary research for me to use. When looking for journals related to my hypothesis,