Preview

Everything for Sale

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
986 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Everything for Sale
Everything for Sale by Robert Kuttner:

A Summary

[Insert full name here]

[Insert institutional information here]

Everything for Sale by Robert Kuttner:
A Summary In his book, Robert Kuttner (1999) tries to shake the dominant orthodoxy of laissez-faire economics, which he sees as the “natural form of capitalism,” by attempting to “reclaim a defensible middle ground” between when the market is “best left alone” and when it “needs help” (p. 5). Kuttner’s chief premise is that a mixed economy is necessary for a society that is civil and decent, a society where the economy is in optimum health. For Kuttner, unfettered laissez-faire economy is in conflict with mixed economy, and that their opposition is essentially a struggle between the moderate but rational dissent — the call for a mixed economy — and the prevailing orthodoxy, or the desire to retain the economic status quo. He further maintains that a mixed economy is realistic precisely because there is virtually no escape from politics, especially in the economic landscape where the government can influence its course by adopting certain national economic policies.

Kuttner readily accepts some notable contributions of the market system. For instance, he concedes that “[m]arkets accomplish much superbly,” and that “[t]hey offer consumers broad choices” (Kuttner, 1999, p. 11). Paraphrasing Adam Smith, Kuttner (1999) states that “the great paradox of the market is that the individual pursuit of self-interest aggregates to an efficient general good” (p. 11). He reaffirms the long-held belief that markets, when left alone, can lead to a vibrant economy.

Yet, Kuttner eventually notes that the free market capitalist system is not entirely a rigid structure that has an aversion to changes. He believes that, “[f]or economies to operate efficiently, drastic change or abrupt disjuncture is the exception rather than the rule” (Kuttner, 1999, p. 12). Thus, markets

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gke Task 4

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Steven (2009, December 14). Capitalism and communism - Gilles Dauv | libcom.org. libcom.org. Retrieved January 5, 2013, from http://libcom.org/library/capitalism-communism-gilles-dauve…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that there is no point in being for or against a free market but instead we should change the question and answer for ourselves when a market is truly free. He argues that a market that is free is one that has an end or a goal. He believes that the absence of a goal will lead to a power struggle and thus – even if it appears free it is not. Chapter two of this book covers issues about consumerism. The author proposes that the issue of consumerism isn’t that we are too attached to our possessions but that we are too detached; the issue is not buying but shopping.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Markets are what drive the global economy skyward; as they create an environment for wants and needs. To define the word market by relating it to economics, simply it means “the demand for a particular commodity or service.” (Oxford Dictionaries, 2010) Now, being able to fulfil ones wants and needs stems from the idea of creating a market equilibrium of supply and demand in a certain economy. More specifically on a micro-economic level, this constantly changing equilibrium can be shown with the Canadian housing market. Canada is a leader in world economic growth, ranking 2nd in the entire world (Encyclopedia Americana, 2010). That being…

    • 3698 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    An Essay on Methland

    • 1082 Words
    • 4 Pages

    national-level market. The concept of a market is one that Meredith L. McGill tactfully delves…

    • 1082 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay is a short critique of the theory by Milton and Rose Friedman, "Free to choose: A personal statement", focusing on chapter 1. I will argue that Friedman is right in saying, "… voluntary exchange is a necessary condition for both prosperity and freedom" but that there are shortcomings in his theory. Voluntary exchange is defined as a trade of something which is done with both persons consent. For instance a problem with the theory Milton Friedman expresses through voluntary exchange is; how voluntary is a voluntary exchange when looked at in certain conditions. I will attempt to show that the prosperity and freedom promised by Friedman's theory has not been achieved by everyone. Friedman has many shortcomings and this essay will outline and criticise them, focusing mainly on his assumption of power, choice and market efficiency. This essay also addresses the issues of globalisation, as this is a concept also talked about by Friedman in his essay and is also relevant in neoliberal theory. Neoliberal theory is, "an updated version of classical political economy that is dedicated to market individualism and minimal statism." As I point out in the essay these dedications are not thoroughly adhered to by businesses for which this theory is supposed to entail. The first topic will be on choice followed by power and market efficiency. Andrew Heywood says of Milton Friedman, "The free-market view, advanced by theorists such as Hayek and Friedman, holds that general prosperity is best achieved by a system of unregulated capitalism." This essay also hopes to prove that this assumption is false.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unregulated markets defend man's productivity and his inalienable rights (Binswanger,…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ostrom's Dichotomy

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    She proposes that the “dichotomous view of the world explained patterns of interaction and outcomes related to markets for the production and exchange of strictly private goods, but failing to “adequately accounted for internal dynamics within private firms (pg 409).” She points out that this simple system cannot explain the complex nature of humanity and economics. It does not “deal with the wide diversity of institutional arrangements that humans craft to govern, provide, and manage public goods and commonpool resources (pg 409).” The dichotomous economic worldview does not do the proper job of illustrating the interaction between human nature, culture, politics, and economics. Ostrom begins to explore and conclude that there needs to be a more complex understanding.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free market ideologues, in their well-meaning crusade against regulation, stress that it is imperative for markets to be self-regulating. Whenever the government encroaches on a private business’ rights to limit its actions, there is a misallocation of resources. If people are not allowed to do what they find most profitable, the incentive to invest and innovate is lost. Hence, if the government puts a ceiling on property rent, landowners lose the incentive to perpetuate their existing property, or build new ones. Or, if the state restricts the sale of exotic financial products, two willfully contracting parties that may have gained from innovative transactions, which fulfill some eccentric need, cannot realize the potential profits of free contract. At the risk…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lutz, Mark A. (1979). The Limitations of Karl Marx’s Social Economics. Review of Social Economy. Vol. 37, No. 3.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Sandel’s 2012 article, What Isn’t for Sale, he explains the difference between our old market economy, where government was in charge of regulating our economy by implementing specific laws and policies, and the emerging market society. Market society, as Sandel explains, is where almost everything is up for sale. This idea was introduced in the 1980’s after the Cold War, when competition and the hunger for money were big (2012). Sandel suggests that inequality is a major culprit for a demoralized market and urges everyone to regain control of our market and our morals.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Market Economy

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Market Economy represents the enhancement of transportation as it pertains to buying, selling, and trading goods. With better transportation, costs of shipping freight decreased while also the speed of shipping materials long distances increased. This allowed for a new economic system where everyone benefited such as farmers, manufacturers, etc. Farmers were able to produce and ship more crops without having to pay ridiculous prices for the cost of transportation. Improved transportation of crops and goods in and out of different states across America due to canals steamboats allowed the people living in America to grow financially. Advancements in technology…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Economic Theory

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The global economy recovers from the crisis that engulfed global financial markets in the course of 2008. The effort to stave off total economic collapse has left governments burdened with massive debt that will take years of painful effort to work off. The policy prescriptions of market liberalism, including deregulation, privatization and regressive tax reform, are being advanced with seemingly undiminished confidence.Economics, as a field, got in trouble because economists were seduced by the vision of a perfect, frictionless market system. If the profession is to redeem itself, it will have to reconcile itself to a less alluring vision — that of a market economy that has many virtues but that is also shot through with flaws and frictions. The good news is that we don’t have to start from scratch. The Crisis between 2006 - 2102 basis in the microeconomics theory is a global effect. The…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I Pencil

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages

    There is no better, more easily understood, and more fun explanation of the complexity of markets than Leonard Read’s “I, Pencil.” It ought to give considerable pause when we listen to the arrogance of politicians who tell us they can manage an economy better than millions, perhaps billions, of independent decision makers in pursuit of their own personal goals. Its message to would-be planners is to bug out! Walter E. Williams John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics George Mason University…

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Left or Right Wing

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Left wing or right wing? It is important to know because that decides how much government involvement there is in an economy. Two different ways are classic capitalism, a right wing economy which has less government involvement in people's lives and socialism, a left wing economy, which has more government involvement in people's lives. If these were blended together it would form a mixed economy. Either way there will be issues, such as a decrease in production, decrease in the standard of living, and a decrease in incentive. Those who believe classic capitalism a social system based on the principal of individual rights is the best way to run an economy, say it is because more competition, promotes a high quality of goods for low prices, also the economy is flexible and can respond quickly to changing consumer demand. Those who believe otherwise say classic capitalism may result in unemployment and the crash of the stock market. People that consider socialism, a social organization that is ran by the government is a better alternative say so as income and wealth are more evenly distributed, and consumers then receive the basic necessities of life. Those who oppose this say socialism results in lack of incentive and it is unfair that everyone earns the same wage no matter what job one carries out. A mixed economy is a blend of socialism and capitalism. It is a mixture of freedoms and regulations, constantly changing because of the lack of principles involved. It is the attempt to gain the advantages of freedom without government having to give up its power. The best position is one in favor of a mixed economy because it has a little bit of both, which then equalizes the economy.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    laizzez faire

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Laissez-faire (or sometimes laisser-faire) is an economic environment in which transactions between private parties are free from government restrictions, tariffs, and subsidies, with onlyenough regulations to protect property rights.As a system of thought, laissez faire rests on the following axioms:1. The individual is the basic unit in society.2. The individual has a natural right to freedom.3. The physical order of nature is a harmonious and self-regulating system.4. Corporations are creatures of the State and therefore must be watched closely by the citizenrydue to their propensity to disrupt the Smithian spontaneous order.These axioms constitute the basic elements of laissez-faire thought, although another basic andoften-disregarded element is that markets should be competitive, a rule that the early advocates oflaissez-faire have always emphasized…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays