Evidence Analysis Essay

In this evidence analysis paper, “Leaders and Managers” by Hugh Nibley, people will see that Nibley tries to approach the different contrast between managers and leaders through different examples such as the earthly Christian history, Societies in the book of Mormon, and other different examples in the current society with different evidence provided. However, as people approach to this evidence analysis paper, they also should see how Nibley addresses opposing views, and some logical fallacies
In an impartial point of view we can infer that the speech “Leader and Manager” by Hugh Nibley there were multiple times where he tried to prove the ideas given about the distinction of leader from manager. First, Nibley referred that the great change
He could not trusted revelation. as a consequence; Saint Augustine needed of something easier to handle than revelation, that was going to be rhetoric.
Therefore, the inspired leader by revelation ceased, and Saint Augustine trained the bishop city who became a master in public relations, ambitious, seeking of power, and public rhetoric, Nibley provides reference saying that bishops cities training could be found in the Patrologia. Another evident change was the structure of the charismatic meetings by controlled and timed ceremonies following the format of Roman Empire, Nibley used the study of “A Conflict of Ideas in the Late Roman Empire” by Alfoldi to show this similar patterns.
However, Nibley also provides doctrinal examples, with doctrinal I mean religious, he used example of the Book of Mormon to express the vast difference between a manager and a leader. In a impartial position the Book of Mormon is used as an evidence to his speech, because even though is a book of faith, the examples used by Nibley just follow the conditions of the human nature and the human potential to support distinction between managers and