Preview

EVIDENCE OF COLLATERAL ACTS IN ALABAMA

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
270 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
EVIDENCE OF COLLATERAL ACTS IN ALABAMA
EVIDENCE OF COLLATERAL ACTS IN ALABAMA
Collateral Acts
Rule of Evidence Ala.R.Evid. 404(b), provides for: 1) the exclusion of collateral acts offered to show character – good or bad --, and; 2) provides exceptions, such as where a collateral act of the defendant is offered to show motive, intent or plan. Thus, for the Burbank evidence to be admissible under the “collateral act” exception, it cannot be used to show how “bad” an actor DG is, but must be couched in terms of motive, intent or plan.
Pattern and Practice
Frequently, lawyers confuse Rule 404(b) “collateral acts,” with the phrase “pattern and practice” and Rule 406. There is no requirement of a “pattern” under Rule 404(b) “collateral acts.” Evidence of a single similar firing may be admissible. E.g., Marshall v. State, [Ms. 1070461, 2007 WL 2459967] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2007).
This is in contrast to Rule 406, Ala.R.Evid., related to “pattern and practice” or “habit,” which does require the offeror to come forward with proof of multiple, similar acts. See C. Gamble, Gamble’s Alabama Rules of Evidence 406 at “Practice Pointers” para. 4 (“[j]udicial emphasis appears to fall upon the concept that habit requires a regular response to a repeated situation”).
Finally, Gore v. BMW addressed the constitutionality of Alabama’s methods for imposing punitive damages. In conjunction with the Hammond and Green Oil, it is a part of Alabama’s judicial review of punitive damage awards for excessiveness.
It does not in any way expand the Alabama Rules of Evidence, and in specific, does not expand what may be shown at trial. See BMW of North America v. Gore, 510 U.S. 559 (1996).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Criminal Trial of Defendant McKenzie Crowe consisted of several different key factors that contributed to the death of Allison Bell, a beloved grandmother, mother, and sister. On January 28, 2013 at 2:30 a.m., McKenzie Crowe was driving northbound on Cook rd. while the victim Allison Bell was Explorer was totaled. Authorities airlifted Allison to Grady where she was pronounced dead upon arrival.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defense attorney may argue based on two precedents of US Supreme Court - Booth v. Maryland (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989) and state that this testimony is irrelevant to the crime itself and is not connected to the facts of the case and also victim’s testimony is unacceptable during death penalty cases. But US Supreme Court overruled these two precedents by its decision on Payne v. Tennessee case (1991). This decision holds that testimony on the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case Montgomery v. Louisiana Henry Montgomery was charged with the murder of Charles Hunt. He was sentenced to life in prison without parole. However he was only 17. Henry Montgomery should be sentenced to life in prison without parole because he committed murder. He was willing to kill an innocent man. 58% of states have come to the conclusion that the risk of releasing the murder under the age of 18 has the risk of future victims. Meaning if we let this criminal out he could strike again. The sentences should be based on age. Miller v. Alabama was about a 14 year old and Monomer v. Alabama was about a 17 year old. You can not compare these two ages. 17 is near…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Haugen Vs Ford Summary

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Haugen v. Ford Motor Co., the requirement of Article 2-302(2) that the court required an affording opportunity for the buyer to present evidence to aid the court in making a determination. In this case, Plaintiff buyer challenged the judgment of the District Court of Williams County (North Dakota) that granted summary judg-ment in favor of defendant manufacturer dismissing the buyer's damage claim based on a liability exclusion for damage from fire. The buyer filed a complaint against the man-ufacturer when the car he bought burst into flames while he drove it. The manufacturer was awarded summary judgment dismissing the buyer's claim based on a liability ex-clusion for damage from fire included in the limitation of liability. The court…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    • McKennon v. Ashville Banner Publishing Company: Progression of the after –Acquired Evidence Doctrine, by Lauren L Logan…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Respondent, Bagley, was indicted in violation of federal narcotics and firearms statutes. Before trial, respondent filed a discovery motion, requesting whether any governmental witnesses had been compensated, in any way, for their testimony. The government replied that they had not. Two of the government’s witnesses, O’Conner and Mitchell were state law enforcement officers who had been working undercover to assist the ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms). At trial, Respondent was found guilty of the narcotics charges, but not the firearm charges. Sometime later, he filed requests for information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, and found out that O’Conner and Mitchell had been paid for their testimony against him. He moved to have his sentence vacated.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal issue in question (on appeal) is whether the defendants can claim the self-defense defense. The defendants wish to claim this defense because Agent Wallie Howard had opened fire on them during the third cocaine “buy-bust” deal.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Citation Quiz

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | The title of the case is Lewis v. Aston. It was decided in the federal appellate court in the ninth circuit. The volume is 901, and the page is 896, second series. It was decided in 1995. RESPONSE:…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama Tort Law is the only truly comprehensive resource on tort law in Alabama. With expert discussion of proof requisites and defenses, it covers all the elements of each tort actionable under Alabama law. It provides the information necessary to determine if there is a case and what is needed to prove or defend it. Alabama Tort Law not only provides up-to-date coverage of relevant case law and analysis, it also includes comprehensive appendices with practical material, including checklists and sample complaints for frequently encountered topics.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading and viewing the racism pieces, I conclude that a want for structure and a need to be dominant were two driving factors in the wrongful Scottsboro trials. Many white people during the Great Depression wanted the world to be black and white, but the problem is that the world exists in vibrant colors. White people during the Great Depression lacked the structure that they wanted, which was a reason behind their racist actions (Routledge). These people served on juries and decided that the Scottsboro boys were guilty despite no substantial evidence (Anderson). The white people on the jury that declared the Scottsboro boys guilty, may have done this because of a need to be dominant. Humans want to have power, and one way for humans…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V Ohio

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the Court’s decision, why may illegally seized evidence not be used in a trial?…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided." The goal of this rule is to allow parties to present all of the evidence that bears on the issue to be decided, and to keep out all evidence that is immaterial or that lacks Probative value. Evidence that is offered to help prove something that is not at issue is immaterial. For example, the fact that a defendant attends church every week is immaterial, and thus irrelevant, to a charge of running a red light. Probative value is a tendency to make the existence of any material fact more or less probable. For instance, evidence that a murder defendant ate spaghetti on the day of the murder would normally be irrelevant because people who eat spaghetti are not more or less likely to commit murder, as compared with other people. However, if spaghetti sauce were found at the murder scene, the fact that the defendant ate spaghetti that day would have probative value and thus would be relevant evidence…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Melrose

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Your honor, opposing counsel, my name is Lamin Johnson, the prosecutor representing the state of Illinois. Larry Mabry stole Gary Roper’s watch, and then Gary Roper went back to the Sharks’ clubhouse and told the rest of the boys around 2:00 PM on October 11th, 2013 and he tried to get the rest of his gang members riled up, his exact words were “Let’s go get Mabry, he stole my wrist watch, we should go mess him up real good.” Roper knew that Dennis Moran was carrying a gun that day because when they were in the clubhouse Dennis Moran showed them the gun, Gary Roper even “ooed and aahed” about it. Dennis Moran also stated “Let’s go teach those Jets a lesson” and he kept on repeating those words over and over again, which shows that shooting the victim Larry Mabry was premeditated. Three hours later they went out to go look for Larry Mabry they saw the Jets at the corner of 27th and Miller and then the conflict erupted. Everybody started yelling and screaming at each other. Before too long the Jets were chasing the Sharks. Three gunshots were fired during the chase. While the Sharks were running, Dennis Moran pulled out the gun turned around and shot Larry Mabry twice in the chest and abdomen, let it show that Dennis Moran was not running away, if he had enough time to shoot that accurately. Let it show that Dennis Moran stated that he saw Larry Mabry with an alleged gun and claimed to have “run like crazy” to get out of there. However Dennis Moran did not see the alleged gun that Larry Mabry had because Dennis Moran did not have time to pull this alleged gun out, he only reached for his pocket and that’s when Dennis Moran shot Larry Mabry twice. Later that night Officer O’Toole arrested Dennis Moran and Larry Mabry. “In this problem, Gary Roper and Dennis Moran are accused if murder in the shooting death of Larry Mabry. Dennis Moran claims self-defense and Gary Roper will argue against accountability for…

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper will present the Exclusionary Rule and the original intentions for its enactment. It will discuss the importance of the rule and how it is a protection against an unlawful search and seizure and a violation of the rights provided by the Fourth Amendment. Also, this document will display the history of the Exclusionary Rule, with its first appearance in the case, Boyd v. United States in 1886. Weeks v. United States will show a better-established, stronger version of the exclusionary rule. Another expansion of the rule will be described by the Mapp v. Ohio case. In this paper, I will also state and describe the four primary exceptions to the exclusionary rule: Inevitable Discovery Doctrine, Valid Independent Source, Harmless Error, and the Good Faith Exception. I will subsequently describe the possible abuse of these exceptions and the complications with the exceptions. The document will examine statistical data regarding the exclusionary rule and conclude with my personal opinions regarding the exclusionary rule and its exceptions.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scottsboro Trials

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Scottsboro Boys were nine black teenage boys accused of rape in Alabama in 1931. The landmark set of legal cases from this incident dealt with racism and the right to a fair trial.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics