Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

evolution vs god

Powerful Essays
1508 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
evolution vs god
Evolution vs. God
Evolution vs. God….. Most documentaries are only a creative treatment of actuality and one person’s perception. To justify this statement we’ll question whose version of the truth are we as viewers being subjected to, since documentaries only create a synopsis of actuality and bias.
The purpose of this documentary is to position the audience in a manner of which would test their ability to question their knowledge in science by comparing it with religion. Evolution vs. God is shaking the foundations of faith by providing supposed facts, proof and interviews addressing personal beliefs about the topic of Evolution versus God. This documentary was made in the USA, produced by Ray Comfort on July 9th 2013, and filmed within the campuses of the most popular and highly regarded Universities in America. This informative documentary challenges social and cultural beliefs all around the world and is designed to stir controversy.
Throughout many centuries human beings have wondered the earth, looking for answers, looking for proof and observing every living thing for one of the most important reasons. How did we come to exist? How was the world created? This has been debated for centuries and so far there has only been two theories; evolution or God. Comfort uses a variety of techniques to persuade viewers to agree with his version of reality and truth. Using interviews, the Darwinian Theory, examples, facts and images, Ray Comfort exerts his disbelief in evolution and attempts to discredit the evolution theory. Using carefully selective interview questions and editing techniques, Comfort sets out to challenge the minds of scientific students to encourage them and viewers to support the Creation theory.
Evolution vs. God begins with a black background that slowly reveals the phrase [pause] ‘Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence’ which is quoted by Richard Dawkins. By starting the documentary with a text overlay makes the viewer think of their faith. {slide} After, the next scene blasts with an explosion of light and forms into the galaxy that then shows the heading of the documentary ‘Evolution vs. God - shaking the foundations of faith’, effectively gaining viewers attention. This introduction scene happens in 40 seconds. The inclusion of dramatic music; a group of violins creating a sound of tension building up, viewers are intrigued by both visuals and sounds simultaneously, creating an irresistible documentary.
Although the documentary doesn’t reveal its biased point of view from the outset, the producer cleverly decides to bring his opinion in near the end of the film. Instead he selectively begins with the opinions voiced from the large amounts of University students that major in sciences, Professors that teach a variation of different subjects of science and even gives scientific facts about the Darwinian Theory. He asks both students and Professors if they believe in God or Evolution and interestingly they all declared they were [emphasis] Atheists. (Comfort 2013) When interviewing people, Comfort films them in their environment, whether it be in the class room, in the cafeteria, sitting down outside the University or with friends/teachers, to enable the interviewees to feel comfortable and open about their opinion. In all of these environments the camera shot is level to their face and is a close up from their shoulders up. The effect is an equal and personal response with the interviewed people to allow the viewers and interviewer to have a deeper connection and understanding of their belief.
For the third scene, the camera stops filming and the screen is black and reveals another text overlay phrase; ‘Live Science says of Darwinian evolution: {slide} “It can turn dinosaurs into birds, apes into humans, and amphibious mammals into whales.” (Comfort 2013). This quote is the basis for Comfort to use as he interviews people. In fact professor Craig Stanford is so sure of the Darwinian evolution he decides to expand his thoughts summarising that we don’t need to evoke any supernatural force or power to account for the development of life through time on Earth.
Another Professor Peter Nonacs says, “The ongoing processes is that they are observable in today’s world”. Comfort then uses this as a question later in the film. Meanwhile Comfort asks the students and Professors if this phrase is a belief or fact allowing them to give their opinion. 100% of them said its facts of science however the director / producer twists their mind and the studies of science by asking “What are some observable evidence that evolution is true, something that I don’t have to put beliefs into?”
The Camera stops filming the professor after Comfort asked the question and then another phrase is revealed; [pause] ‘A scientific method is based on “the collection of data through observation and experimentation” quoted by Science Daily’. This selective editing tie in with what Comfort is questioning however, his opinion becomes obvious, in that he claims everyone has to have faith or believe in something. The Camera starts again with the same Professor and he answers with “Take a look at what happened 65 million years ago”. Comfort, in a sarcastic tone, replies with “Hang on I can’t that’s 65 million years ago”. Comfort’s opinion, which is the dominant one, claims that these facts aren’t reliable because they happened so long ago and were observed through long periods of time and humans can’t live longer than 100 years. So many students and Professors came up with answers that were observed through thousands and millions of years which is not possible therefore objectifying more God. Some students and professors even say that there is none observable evidence through this present time. As the students and Professors were proven wrong, the camera zooms out more, showing their chest up. The camera angle is slightly higher than their faces which positions them in a weaker, more submissive state, encouraging the viewers to think [pause] maybe evolution isn’t as credible as perhaps previously thought.
That scene ends into and red and black background and two phrases that proves Rays perception ‘We are condemned to live only for a few decades and that’s too slow, too small a time scale to see evolution going on’ quoted by Richard Dawkins. The other phrase was ‘We see nothing of these slow changes in progress, until the hand of time has marked the lapse of ages – Charles Darwin’. Surprisingly still nobody could give hard evidence of an observable example of evolution so the students and professors stated that they [emphasis] believed or had faith on the evolutionary theory. Right at that moment Ray stated that everyone has to believe or have faith in something its part of the human nature, we all believe in something whether its true or not. Ray keeps on pushing the students and professors to rethink the evolution theories and the more they think about it they start to realise Ray has good point, while they think that piano music starts in a tic-toc rhythm and the camera angle changes to a lower angle to empower them.
The camera stops rolling and reveals the same phrase that started this documentary except this time it reveals the objectivity of Faith after he has explained his opinion {slide} ‘Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence’ which was quoted by Richard Dawkins’. In the end of the documentary Ray decides to reveal what he has faith in, [pause] God. The reason why Ray has pushed the limits of Evolution by representing God is because he is showing the different faiths that everyone has, not knowing 100% if it’s true or not. Believing something is true doesn’t in reality make it true.
Throughout this documentary Ray decides to use a sequence of sounds to help bring together the whole evolution vs. god experience. In the start there’s a quick build-up of violins that gives the views a sense of tension, in the middle while explaining evolution the music is slow and subtle and once the evolution theories start to collapse and the interviewed re-evaluate their beliefs a tic-toc piano music is played. At the end of the documentary a sort of exciting music is played with violins, pianos and other instruments to position the readers to feel exhilarated.
Now a days it’s very important in our social and cultural environment to have faith in something. Having faith in something is very healthy and is something us as humans do naturally. Some people may see this documentary and think that it’s wrong, for example for atheists watching this documentary are thinking that Ray is discriminating against their beliefs by testing their knowledge on evolution and comparing it to the knowledge he has in his belief in God. However, for the viewers that do have faith in God would glorify this documentary. There is no proven right or wrong religion, therefore, culturally and socially anyone can choose freely what they want to have faith in.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The use of rhetorical sentences helps get the reader thinking about the controversy between evolution and creationism. Dawkins and Coyne appeal to pathos as they set the tone of frustration and aggressiveness towards creationism. Creating this tone gets the reader more excited about the topic and more understanding to the author. Juxtaposition appeals to logos and allows the readers to understand why it would be illogical for creationism and evolution to be in the same category. It is much easier for the reader to compare evolution and creationism when two examples are given very close to each other. The authors’ appeal to logos is their most powerful tool in convincing their audience. They make many great points about why evolution should stand apart from intelligent design. Overall, Dawkins and Coyne were effective at persuading the audience in their favor. They appealed to ethos, pathos, and logos effectively causing the audience to be more invested into the argument and more likely to agree with them. These tools prepare the audience for their warning at the end of the essay about teaching controversies that are not really controversies. The authors say teaching creationism in the schools or any other false controversies would lead to the end of quality science…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    God and science, as Keller points out later in his book, are not in conflict, showing why many evolutionists are Christians. These insights give Keller’s readers a reason to believe, and through this he helps them realize all the evidence they never knew was right in front of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many individuals, philosophy and the discussions regarding the origin of man are puzzling topics. Two of the prominent philosophies regarding this issue are that humans originate from God (Biblical worldview) or humans have no supernatural origins (Naturalistic viewpoint). Logically, these viewpoints contradict each other. L. Russ Bush wrote his book, “The Advancement, Keeping Faith in an Evolutionary World” to help explain why the Biblical viewpoint is correct and the Naturalistic viewpoint has flaws and inconsistencies. Although these are weighty topics to discuss, Bush was successful in explaining how theology and the study of Christian concepts can connect with current culture.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Attention Getter: The great quarrel between science and religion has been in full swing since their beginning and has since taken a twist into controversy. Science wants to see the facts while religion bases everything on their belief in the Bible. These statements still hold truth today.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Lie: Evolution by Ken Ham is an informational book on the lies and corruption that evolution brings into society. A side purpose of this book is to encourage the reader to use Genesis as the foundation for defending your faith in Creation and God. The chapters summarized in this paper are the first six and the eighth.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book acknowledges that this discipline is overwhelmingly secular. Because of this, science tries to leave out God as creator and the ultimate answer to difficult questions. Accordingly, the author does not suggest that all scientific thought and testing be discarded, rather science confirms what we know about God.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Bible is a book. It’s a good book, but it’s not the only book.” This quote by Henry Drummond in the film sets the scene for the entire story of Inherit the Wind. The idea that the Bible is the only means for teaching is challenged and sends the town into a riot. This paper will explore the conflicts, relevance, characters, stereotypes, acting and directing of Inherit the Wind. These elements come together effectively to create a great classic film. Major conflicts The main conflict of this film is the debate between teaching Creation versus evolution in schools. Bertram Cates is put on trial for teaching his students the concept of evolution. This film is based on incidents from the 1920s, during which religion was prominent and the…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GP_Science_and_religion

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Extension Lecture 3: Science and Religion 21 April & 25 April 2014 “Science without Religion is lame; Religion without Science is blind” – Albert Einstein ‘God is the Ultimate Scientist’ – Anonymous Lecture Outline 1. What is science? 2. What is religion? 3.…

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cst Interview Paper

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This assignment really allowed me to examine those around me and their varying beliefs about creation. I was shocked to discover that people so close to me actually believe in evolution and the big bang theory. I consider it a privilege to have opened up this door to conversation with people I never even considered. The course has prepared me to apologetically defend and explain the creation account and the gospel. Please be in prayer with me as the Lord wants to use me to speak truth to my neighbor. Through the course of this paper I will detail the answers of my interviewees from a survey with many vital framework questions concerning origin. For the survey I interviewed my mother, father, and next door neighbor.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the beginning of time, humanity has continuously evolved concepts and adopted ideas in order to obtain a better understanding of the world around it. However, it is very difficult for people to accept new theories that contradict their existing belief systems. Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee’s play Inherit the Wind focuses on the rejection of evolution because of a society’s religious beliefs. The story defines the struggle that citizens of a rural area experience while attempting to maintain their faith in a partially secular world.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science verses Religion has been an ongoing debate all over the world for centuries. Depending on who one talks to about these topic will depend on the passion and beliefs one has. As we saw in the movie Angels and Demons all the major characters such as Robert Langdon, Camerlengo McKenna and the former pope had their own strong feelings and beliefs. Certain questions have been raised about these two topics that I will be elaborating on later in this essay such as, Is there room in the world for both, Can one render the other obsolete, and would I rather live in a world without science or religion? I find all these questions very interesting and interaging, just like the movie Angels and Demons.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the first chapter of The Greatest Show On Earth, Dawkins discusses the acceptance of evolution as fact. He says that even with the insurmountable evidence to prove that it is a fact, evolution is still considered to some degree to be just a theory. In a survey of Americans, 40% of people oppose the idea of evolution. They instead believe that humans were created independently from all other living organisms. The percentage is only slightly lower in Britain. He argues that many of those who do not believe evolution to be a fact are uninformed. He states that his purpose for writing this book is to educate these people so that they may realize the truth and change their minds.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    K.C. Cole discusses in her article, “Seeing Things,” that there is never just one way to look at something. There are numerous views one can take on when observing possible scientific theories. Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution is criticized and compared to the theory of creationism. Both theories are prime examples of seeing things from a different perspective influenced by either science or religion. The ability to see things clearly resonates in both arguments and each side presents a different way on how to perceive their own theory. To have clear vision you must be able to make decisions based on the information given to you as well as provide intelligent answers about how you see things.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays