Preview

Examine the view that the family is a universal institution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
618 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examine the view that the family is a universal institution
The answer to this question will be dependent on your own definition of ‘the family’. The functionalist George Peter Murdock believes the family is universal and that the ideal family is the nuclear family, however, many other sociologists e.g. Gough, Gonzalez, Callahan and Sheeran disagree and believe that there is more than one way to class the family.

The functionalist George Peter Murdock examined the institution of the family in a wide range of 250 societies in 1949. He concluded that some sort of family existed in every society; therefore indicating that the family is universal. Murdock defined the family as: “a social group characterized by common residence, economic co-operation and reproduction.” With this evidence he believed that the nuclear family is a universal human social grouping; it exists as a distinct and strongly functional group in every known society.

In 1959 the anthropologist Kathleen Gough provided information on the Nagar society. Her opinion differs from Murdock’s as she believes every family is different due to their background and the society they live in. In terms of Murdock’s definition, no family existed in the Nagar society because those who maintained a sexually approved adult relationship did not live together and cooperate economically. Gough found that the Nagar society was matrifocal; most groupings were based on female biological relatives, as marriage had no significant role in the Nagar society; therefore showing that Gough has a different opinion to what the definition of a universal family is as the Nagar society is an exception to Murdock’s classification.

Nancie Gonzalez concluded from her studies that 45% of black Caribbean families had female heads therefore supporting the idea that matrifocal families can be regarded as a form of family structure in its own right. Murdock’s definition supports the idea of having “at least one adult of each gender” whereas

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Functionalists employ the idea of the nuclear family being the main universal family in society and most benefitting. The nuclear family functions to meet the pro dominant means of society (sexual reproduction, educational and economic functions). The family allows each member of the family to shine individually and enjoy success. Functionalist Charles Murray also argues other family institutions weaken the production of society’s needs. Divorce is ultimately highlighted as one of the main causes of this creation of new reconstituted families which are presumably less effective in meeting the functional needs of society through the family.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Item A makes clear that different sociologists ‘are divided over both the extent of family diversity and its importance’. The Functionalists and the New Rights view increased family diversity as ‘a serious threat’; whilst Robert Chester argues in recent years there has been a ‘shift from the conventional to the neo-conventional family’.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Outline and evaluate sociological views on the role of the family in society (33 marks)…

    • 1423 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murdock was the first functionalist theorist who studied the family. He did this in 250 different societies of different cultures; this study was done in 1949. He claimed that the family is universal and inevitable and that families exist in every society. He saw that the family had four functions occurred in every society. These functions are sexual, reproductive, economic and educational. The sexual function of the family is to establish sexual relationships whereby people have one partner who meets their sexual needs. This reduces step-relations and the number of children born outside marriage and also reduces the number of STI/STD’s. Another function of the family that Murdock saw was reproductive, this is vital to keep the human race going as it continues to create new generations which in turn, provides new work forces. The third function that Murdock saw was that of economic. This is that families provide economic support to particularly the young but this is extending as parents are paying longer to keep children. This economic function allows the economy to function successfully by instilling attitudes and values…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    unit 7 p1

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    George Murdock (1897-1985) claimed that in all societies families have functions. He claims that in order for family to function properly sexual function is allowed and reproductive function to extend. In addition, socialisation is also taught in family in order for individual to behave and the economic factor which can be use as a financial source.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other sociologists such as Parsons argue that the family has to provide the primary socialisation of children, to ensure the safety of society’s culture and the stabilisation of adult personalities. The family performs vital functions of society, and for all the individual members’ in it. “The family reproduces the next generation and thereby ensures the continuation of society over time” The quote explains that if there was no such thing as a family, then there would be no sexual satisfactions, as a result of this there would be no reproducing, and therefore could lead to the dying out of the population, which means humans would become extinct. However potentially disruptive it could be it is still necessary to sustain a bond between couples, also setting moral rules.…

    • 607 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As is known to all, definitions of the family may vary and change over time and according to areas of interest. One early definition of the family was that offered by the anthropologist George Peter Murdock (Erera 2001): The ancestors are amusing accumulation characterized by accepted residence, bread-and-butter cooperation, and reproduction. It includes adults of both sexes, at atomic two of whom advance a socially accustomed animal relationship and one or added children, own or adopted, of the sexually cohabiting adults.…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Canada today it seems that there is a predominately functionalistic view of the family. These functionalistic views of the family are also seen as the root of many societies problems. The importance of the family and its function for society constitutes the primary set of reasons why there is a social as distinguished from purely productive differentiation of sex roles. Functionalists felt that the nuclear family was most adapted to the functionalists theory, as it is insular and mobile therefore aiding society by keeping up with economic movement, but in the process becoming detached from the extended family support. Over the past several decades, Canadian society has witnessed an evolution in family structure and the basis of that structure has evolved over a period of time. The family image can be, and is, interpreted differently by a variety of people, including those within the family group itself. One such image is that of the nuclear family.…

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A traditional view of the family is held by Functionalists. Functionalists favour the nuclear family which Murdock identifies as ‘a social group characterised by common residents, economic cooperation and reproduction. It includes adults of both sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship and one or more children (own or adopted) of the sexually cohabiting parents.’ Leach describes the nuclear family as the cereal packet family because it is seen as the ideal family of a Functionalist society. Parsons identifies the nuclear family as having a strict division of roles between the two parents. Their roles are segregated where the man has the instrumental role of being the breadwinner. Then his wife has the expressive role with domestic and childcare responsibilities. Similarly the New Right favour the nuclear family and pinpoint this family as the best family for raising children. However the nuclear family is not the most common family type in the UK today. This can be seen in the statistics that show 20% of households in the UK are made up of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation 1.5 nuclear family. Furthermore only 5% of the UK lives in a traditional nuclear model.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘family’ is generally regarded as a major social institution social unit created by blood, marriage or adoption giving us a sense of belonging (The Vanier Institute of the Family, 1994 pg. 6). The family is an institution that has evolved and changed over time from a social unit that was formed for mainly economic reasons to one that mainly provides for emotional needs of its members. This can be seen after observing the past and present of survival, children, and marriage of families throughout history.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murdoch (1949) claimed the family was a universal institution. He studied 250 societies and found the family, in some form, was present in all of them. This suggests that families are necessary in some way, whether it be for societies to survive, for individual well-being or indeed both.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociologist, Robert Chester, recognises the little increase in family diversity. However, he does not regard this as significant no sees it in a negative light. Chester has come up with the ‘neo-conventional’ family. This is a family that uproots from the nuclear family. Although it includes the traditional mother, father and dependent children, it also combines with the division of labour between a male breadwinner and a female homemaker. The neo-conventional family is similar to the symmetrical family that is described by Willmott and Young. Chester…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    life and family

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, the premodern era in the British society was greatly dominated by the traditionally recognized nuclear family as the main definition of a family unit. Acknowledged the perfect nuclear family, the 'cereal packet family' is where the whole family gather at the breakfast table in the morning. Structurally, the husband is the bread winner and the wife's duties include housework and childcare.(Browne K). Return to the modern era, rapidly changing times and social standards mean we must reconsider Murdock's ideology of a 'family'. Argumentatively, individuals declaring…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dh3N 34

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This essay will discuss the “modern family Structures” within society and explore the lack of any “normal” or standard family. Using existing sociology perspectives this essay will further discuss modern behaviours, experiences and life chances within a specific family unit and how they fit the existing theories. Finaly the author will evaluate the usefulness if any of these theories and how they can be used in a coherent manner to explain the impact they have on a family unit and in turn what impact the family has on the individual.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kathleen Gough disagreed with Murdock statement that the family is universal since she investigated a society in India called the Nayar who were an exception to the family. For example sandbanham relationships were not lifelong unions, either party could terminate the relationship at any time, sunbanham husbands had no duty towards the offspring’s of their wives, husband and wives did not form an economic unit. Husbands were not expected to maintain their wives. This society was a matrilineal society. \in terms of Murdock definition of the family, no family existed in the nayar society since those who maintained a sexually approved relationship did not live together and cooperate economically.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics