Preview

Example of Irac

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
514 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Example of Irac
MEMORANDUM

ISSUE

I. Can Doe reveal that Mr. King intends on lying in the upcoming litigation if asked if he had any alcohol prior to the accident? II. After consulting with King and he still intends on lying on the stand, can Doe withdraw from the case? III. Can Doe make a false statement of material fact or law to a court and fail to disclose a material fact necessary to avoid assisting King in a criminal or fraudulent act and offer false evidence? RULE
The first relevant ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) is Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information). Rule 1.6(a) prohibits a lawyer from revealing information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by (b) where a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary. The second RPC to be considered is Rule 1.16 (Declining or Terminating Representation). Rule 1.16(a)(1) prohibits the continuing representation of a client when the representation will result in a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Finally, we must consider RPC is Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal). Rule 3.3(a), (b) and (c) prohibit a lawyer from making a false statement of material fact or law to a court and from failing to disclose a material fact necessary to avoid assisting the client in a criminal or fraudulent act. Rule 3.3(c) also prohibits a lawyer from knowingly offering false evidence.
ANALYSIS
The first attempt is to persuade the client not commit perjury and to testify truthfully. Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157 (1986), the Supreme Court held, at a minimum, a lawyer’s first duty when confronted with potential perjury is to attempt to dissuade the client from any unlawful course of conduct. The second approach is to permit the lawyer to withdraw from the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    An odor of an alcoholic beverage was detected emitting from CRABBE'S vehicle and breath while he spoke. He was requested to exit the vehicle to speak with Officers about the incident. CRABBE related he and his girlfriend Tammy drove to Redner's so he could get something to eat. While driving there an arguement began between him and Tammy. Once they arrived at Redner's Tammy exited the vehicle. He asked her to get back in the car but she refused. Shortly thereafter he decided to leave. CRABBE was questioned about the amount of alcohol he consumed tonight. He said "I'm not going to lie, I had a couple drinks a few hours ago." I requested him to submit to a series of psychophysical divided attention tests; some of which he was unable to successfully complete. CRABBE was questioned about the use of marijuana and narcotic analgesics. He related he is not prescribed any medication and he did not use any drugs. CRABBE began to pace by the vehicle and was instructed to stand still on…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 11. A lawyer will often be disqualified from a case if the case is substantially related to a prior representation in which the attorney represented the other side of the dispute.…

    • 795 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Leighe Case Study

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mr. Leighe is charged with a hit and run, that caused a pedestrian to lose his life. Mr. Hall was riding his bike down the road, in front of Leighe, with his front and rear lights working properly, following all the rules. Leighe hit him with the front of his car, then drove away from the accident scene immediately. He had not only been drinking wine that evening, but also drove home, and hid his car at the back of his property. Leighe fled from the crime scene, had alcohol in his system, and hid the evidence. However, his driving record only consisted of two speeding tickets made more than 10 years ago. Leighe claims his car was frosted over making it visibly difficult to see and therefore had no intention of harming Mr. Hall. He also pleaded…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cja324r3 ethical worksheet

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There was only one vehicle parked on the street and was still warm. The car belongs to the couples. The wife informed the officers that she had not driven the car all day. She told the officers that her husband drove the car four hours ago. The officers follow the husband to the door, and the keys fell out of his pocket. The officers perform an alcoholic test on the husband, and he fails it. The officers are responding to a domestic call.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fifth amendment prohibits double jeopardy (del Carmen, 2014). The concept behind prohibiting double jeopardy is to protect the defendant from being tried and punished twice for a single crime, but this doesn’t mean that after a verdict is handed down the process ends (del Carmen, 2014). They can try and get an appeal so that their case and verdict will be reviewed (del Carmen, 2014).…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just giving advice to a client is ultimately Unauthorized Practice of Law because a simple conversation can involve an effect on one’s legal rights. An example of potential UPL mentioned in the book is telling a client where to sign a legal document. As simple of a question as it seems, this has a lot of responsibility pertaining to the lawyer and not the paralegal. The main reason why is because the legal rights of a client may be affected since the client may have to indicate representative capacity (Goldman and Cheeseman 44)…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A lawyer shall abide by a client's decisions concerning the objectives of representation and shall consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    IRAC Analysis

    • 1044 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Defendant Carl Clay entered the partially open door of a motel room around five o’clock pm with the intent to steal a television to replace his broken one. To convict Clay as guilty of burglary, he must meet the stipulations stated in the General Laws chapter 228 numbers one and two. The first law defines burglary as the breaking and entering of a dwelling at nighttime with the intent to commit a felony. The second law defines a felony as the theft of personal property over the value of $500; theft of personal property less than $500 is classified as a misdemeanor. We know Clay was in the motel room around five pm with the intent to steal the TV, as he was caught trying to walk out with it in his hands. We also know Clay did not leave the motel’s property with the TV. For Clay to be found guilty, it has to be proven that the crime occurred at nighttime, whether or not he broke in, if the motel is a considered a dwelling, and if the TV’s cost is based on the retail price or current market value.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Taylor Cohen

    • 393 Words
    • 1 Page

    One of the ethical difficulties that the ABA code creates for the conscientious lawyer occurs when the lawyer gets a guilty client off on a crime that they know they committed. Another ethical difficulty occurs because the code states that they must defend their client even if they know they are guilty, they must do everything they can to win an acquittal but they also have an ethical obligation to prevent another crime from happening. The dilemma occurs when they know their client will commit the same crime again. The conscientious lawyer is also instructed by Canon 7 not to make his own decision about what is just. He cannot take on the role of judge or jury. He must leave it in the hands of the Judge or jury to decide his client’s guilt or innocents. If a lawyer finds it difficult to handle such a situation they can take solace in the belief of Samuel Johnson whose belief it was that the truth is decided by the court’s verdict not the conscious of the lawyer. Dr. Johnson states that even if you, the lawyer on a case feels that his/her arguments are weak they don’t know if they might convince the judge anyway and if it does then the lawyer was wrong and the judge was right.…

    • 393 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What are the five elements pertaining to the establishment of a false claim under the False Claims Act?…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The National Federation of Paralegal System (NFPA) is a very well known organization who has comprised paralegal association of individual and throughout the Canada and United States. They have their own job responsibilities that reflecting the diversity if parallel profession. This is also the responsibility of NFPA paralegal association that every individual legal supervisor does not break the law and perform their duties under given considerations (Zoubek, 2012, p. 26). On the other hand, ABA Models Rules settled by America Bar Association (ABA) for setting the rules according to the standards lawyer’s professional responsibilities and legal ethics in United States of America.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    You are a police officer testifying about a particular crime. It is a case where you honestly don’t know whether or not the suspect is guilty. While on the witness stand, you answer all the prosecutor’s and defense attorney’s questions. You complete your testimony and exit the courtroom, knowing that you have specific knowledge that may help the defense attorney’s case. You have answered all questions truthfully ,but the specific question needed to help the defense was not asked .What should you do?…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rodney King

    • 3023 Words
    • 13 Pages

    A blood alcohol test taken more than five hours after King’s arrest showed a level of 0.079 percent, just below the 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level that in California is presumptive evidence of intoxication. Extrapolating from this figure, state prosecutors and defense attorneys stipulated that King’s…

    • 3023 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Misrepresentations

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page

    I also agree with your position Alicia. Comment 1 of rule 4.1 states that "misrepresentations can also occur by partially true but misleading statements or omissions that are the equivalent of affirmative false statements." If the lawyer failed to disclose this information it could be considered as misleading and/or omission, which can lead to disciplinary actions. I also think Erica points out some great…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    law natural justice

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This question is related to natural justice. In natural justice there are two main point of natural justice : Audi Alterm Partem (right to be heard) and Nemo Judex In Causa Sua (rules against bias). In Badrul issues there are several cases that Badrul must to know:-…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays