Example Of Neutralization Essay

Furthermore, Clarke & Cornish (1985), note that it is important to understand the why behind the commission of criminal offending. We have moved past an era where we blame just or genetics, the researchers and authors presented this semester are interested in learning more about the how, why, and the belief system to get a better understanding of what offenders are thinking. There have been many critics of rational choice theory in relation to neutralizations; however, neutralizations are strategies that are typically used by criminals to justify their actions. There has been five main neutralization techniques that I believe truly give us a better look into an offenders thoughts and decision in regards to crime (Maruna & Copes, 2005). First, to mention the five techniques that are often used my offenders is the denial of injury, responsibility, victim, also the condemnation of condemners, and appeal to higher loyalties. These techniques are crucial in being able to look at an offenders actions and further dissect them. Yet, as Maruna & Copes (2005) mentioned, by
Therefore, when reading this the Seiple & Eifler (2008) work, one is able to gain more knowledge about criminal offending and rational choice theory. They were able to successfully start with bringing up routine activities theory, and integrating the theory that opportunity, in their research in relation to rational choice theory, is explained as the ratio of getting caught versus not getting caught. Therefore, when one is rationally thinking, their chance of getting caught is high, they will employ more self-control, not partake in the opportunity, costs and benefits have been weighed, and a final decision has been made based on their own emotions, situation, and self-control (Seiple & Eifler,