Preview

Examples Of A Philosophical Construct

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
282 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of A Philosophical Construct
Philosophical Construct
Legal justice is concerned with the way in which law distributes penalties for wrongdoing, or allocates compensation in the case of injury or damage. Justice in this sense clearly involves the creation and enforcement of a public set of rules, but to be ‘just’ these rules must themselves have a moral underpinningThe issue of justice lies at the heart of questions about legitimacy and orderly existence, determining whether citizens are willing to accept the law as binding..Supporters of retribution may argue that in principle justice demands that the murderer’s life be forfeit in punishment for his crime; those who advocate deterrence may accept capital punishment but only when empirical evidence indicates that it will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    McBride house FTG

    • 637 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The McBride House ghost first is Dr. McBride himself. Cindy Black believes that the good doctor has no desire to leave his beloved home and extravagant lifestyle. McBride is assumed to be responsible for the never-ending late-night parties that can be heard downstairs as late as 2 o’clock in…

    • 637 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    justice comes from the theory of justice which suggests that crime is an action which is harmful…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justin System Case Study

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Justin System is an important aspect of governance in Canada, and Canadians have different views and perspectives about how justice can be served.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Proponent may state that crime rate has been on the rise in the recent past because too much leniency has been shown to criminals that criminals do not fully account for their crimes. The system allows too much loop holes for criminals’ legal representatives to exploit. If victims can not receive mercy from the criminals, the criminals do not deserve mercy from society either. It is cheaper to put criminals to death than to give them life sentence. The opponent may say that a civil society should not engage in killing retaliation in the name of Justice. Innocent people may die if there is a rush to judgment because someone must be held accountable. The system is skewed against minority and the poor. Both sides are right, victim of violent crimes especially if life is lost deserve justice from society. On the other hand, government endless resource is a formidable huddle for the poor to match, and as a result innocent may be punish for crimes they know nothing…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pojman argues the need for a death penalty. He makes the claim that because of natural instinct, we as human beings demand that a criminal is punished properly in relation the crime he or she commits. We are not fully satisfied until this punishment is fully brought against the criminal (Pojman, 2004). Yet at the same time, we as humans have evolved to be able to refrain from taking vengeance into our hands; instead, we depend on the law to do so. Therefore, the death penalty is a perfect punishment, Pojman argues, because it both satisfies our need for revenge, but also allows the law to settle it swiftly (as compared to waiting out the criminal's lifetime in…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The “principle of justice” itself is a law of the society we live in. In today’s world, every individual is born with various scenarios of what his or her life may become, and an individual starts to choose what he wants and needs for his/her scenario. It is like in a buffet, go and take what you want, but follow the rules. Nobody is allowed to steal from another plate, or kill in order to take somebody else’s plate, or take somebody’s plate by means of unlawful schemes and manipulation. People are still very unpredictable creatures. There are no strict laws that can predict human behavior without mistakes, like in math or physics. That is why people are responsible for the choices they make and can be punished for…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just Deserts

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Since the dawn of time retributive justice in the form of "Let the punishment fit the crime" has been the principle guiding the penalties handed out for various criminal acts, or at least what was defined by the society and the time as a criminal act.…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The complexities of human nature, emotions, thought, morals and ethics have been debated for centuries, and the dilemma of sentencing another human to a form of corporal punishment, incarceration or death, requires a firm foundation in the laws of the land, tempered by years of study and dedication to the law one has sworn to uphold. The several reasons for sentencing of a crime is: Revenge, for an actual or perceived need for vengeance on a violation, usually one that is very personal and emotional in nature. Incapacitation, which is to prevent the criminal from repeating crimes against society by placing them into a correctional facility on a long term or permanent basis. Restoration, is a form of sentencing when the convening authority is attempting to protect the victims by helping them to feel safe and secure. Deterrence is a sentence where the courts attempt to prevent the subject of a crime from offending again. Retribution, which is probably the oldest reason for sentencing was utilized for equal punishment to the crime, drawing from the old adage “eye for an eye”. Lastly is the sentence of rehabilitation, which in societies modern view, the ideal and preferred sentence,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is being overlooked is that restorative justice responses often contain retributive and punitive elements themselves – and sometimes, such as in serious cases, necessarily so. (Barton 1999, Ch. 10) Therefore, blaming retribution, or even punitiveness, for the ills of the criminal justice system is largely beside the point. Punishment and retribution cannot be ruled out by any system of justice. By implication, a more plausible critique of the status quo is…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Shapland (2011) Justice is defined as the quality of being righteous, fair; equitableness or moral correctness. Justice is a term that can be very tricky and many people have often and easily confused with or used interchangeably with the term fairness. In most circumstances, whether at your workplace, your school, your local pub, or in the courtroom, people want to believe that they always want to feel that they deserve and are owed to be treated fairly after being wronged. There are two different types of justice such as Restorative Justice and Retributive Justice. Restorative justice has recently become a very popular yet controversial topic. With it being such a controversial topic there have been a few key elements of the restorative justice program that have been at a longstanding debate. They key elements consist of weather restorative justice should be defined as a result or a process, whether the approach should contain some type of form of punishment, and lastly, whether the approach should contain some type or form of punishment, and lastly whether or not it should be considered as a replacement to the traditional criminal justice system or be integrated into it.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As well as seeing deterrence as a justifiable reason for the death penalty, individuals believe it is an act of fairness and retribution. They see it as a way of “maintaining the distribution of civic burdens”, and a method of payback, which is the “eye for an…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just- Guided by truth, reason, justice, and fairness. Under retributive justice, the punishment for a crime must be proportional to the crime.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment imposes justification for punishment with retribution in the form of a life for a life. Capital punishment is a very controversial issue because of its effects on society. Many believe that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to murderer; however, according to Nygard K. (1996) "… states with active capital punishment have a stable, higher rate of homicide than those without capital punishment. Nygard K. (1996) asserts that… Research revealed that homicide rates actually escalate after a criminal has been executed. Givens M. (1992) points out a noteworthy disadvantage to retribution… Capital punishment is irreversible and a person that has been wrongfully judged and put to death can not be brought back to…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays