Preview

Examples Of Affirmative Defense

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Affirmative Defense
Charley Roberts
Ewell
CRJU 1068
9 October 2014
Affirmative Defense In a criminal court case the defendant may choose to use an affirmative defense. An affirmative defense is one that excuses or justifies the behavior on which the lawsuit is based. When choosing an affirmative defense the defendant is admitting to the crime but saying he or she had good reason to do so. These types of defenses differ from others because the defendant must provide evidence and prove the defense. Affirmative defenses differ from state to state. Some examples of affirmative defenses are insanity, self-defense, duress, statute of limitations and entrapment.
Insanity is a defense to a crime if the accused cannot aid in the preparation of his or her case or was
…show more content…
The M’Naghten Rule, formulated in 1843, defines a person as insane if at the time of the act she had such a disease of the mind that she did not know what she was doing. M’Naghten was a Scottish woodcutter who murdered the secretary to the Prime Minister, Robert Peel. 9 witnesses testified that he was insane. The M’Naghten rule has been adapted by 17 states in some form. John Hinckley shot President Reagan. Pled and found NGRI, he was acquitted of 13 murder, assault, and weapons counts. This caused public outcry because people thought the insanity defense was a loophole in the justice system. Because of this people called for abolishment or revision of insanity plea laws. As a result, the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 was created. “It states that a person cannot be judged not guilty by reason of insanity if the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of her acts.” Before Hinckley’s trial, the prosecution had to prove the defendant was indeed sane, after the trial the defendant must prove their insanity at the time of the crime. 30 states made changes including Utah, Montana, and Idaho, who abolished the defense …show more content…
Because of this right, self-defense is an acceptable affirmative defense. In order for self-defense to be accepted, the defendant must prove that their life was in danger at the time of the crime. If the immediate threat ceases then the act of self-defense must also cease. For example if John is attacked by an intruder and has no other choice but to kill said intruder, the self-defense is valid. However, if that intruder sees John with a gun and runs out the window but John run after, shoots, and kills him the self-defense is no longer valid. Once the intruder ran, John should have ceased his actions as well. One also has the right to prevent harm to oneself by another, they do not need to wait until they are struck by an attacker. For example if Mary Jane gets in an argument with her boyfriend and sees him pick up a knife and come towards her with it she can shoot him before he actually stabs her. Self-defense would still apply in that case. There have been cases of self-defense in recent news. On February 26, 2012 George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman claimed self-defense at trial and was later acquitted of murder charges because of Florida’s “stand your ground” law. On August 9, 2014 18 year old Michael Brown was shot and killed by Officer Darren Wilson. Wilson claims that Brown punched him through the open car window and he felt like he had to defend his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis/Reasoning: The defendant couldn’t justify using self-defense because evidence shows that he was the aggressor in the situation. He is the reason that the situation escalated to the point where it did.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A person's right to self defense begins at the moment the person reasonably believes that he or she is facing deadly force and reasonably…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJS 220: Legal Defense

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If reasonable force us used against an individual and there is a threat of imminent bodily harm or death, and the individual defends themselves, that person may be acquitted of first-degree murder. To argue perfect self-defense, and…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Darius Goes West

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I’m a first year pharmacy student at Midwestern University. Dr. Gurney had shown us the Darius Goes West documentary and it was such an inspiration. Within the documentary I noticed how you and the crew had taken such good care of Darius and always made sure he was comfortable. On the trip, you all were his family caregivers meaning a relative or friend is responsible for attending to the daily needs of another person.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we apply the labels ‘mental illness’ and ‘schizophrenic mental disorder to a person, it does not necessarily mean, from a legal standpoint that this person does not know right from wrong. What this term would include would be things like mental deficiencies, like when a person would suffer form hallucinations or other mental diseases and retardation. “In M'Naghten's modern form, a defendant who pleads insanity must prove that at the time of the offense he or she was suffering from a mental disease or disability, such as retardation, so severely as not to know either "the nature and quality of the act" or whether it was right or wrong” (Gibeaut, 2006). So if this person who committed this crime did not understand the crimes consequences, and did not know the difference between right and wrong, this would fall under M'Naghten's rule. In order for someone to use that insanity defense, these aspects had to be present. From the original rule to now, it has been shortened legally to not knowing right from wrong. As far as alcohol cases go; this person knows right form wrong, but because they are intoxicated from alcohol, they acted in a ‘diminished capacity”; they however were not acting out of mental disease.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The expert testimonies for the two psychiatrists in the movie failed to mention how their experience was satisfactorily applied to the facts of the case. I believe that they thought there was a mental disorder, but she did not fit the category of the M’Naghten rule because she knew the difference between right and…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theodore took the plea bargain that the prosecution offered just to keep the status about his mental health out. It states by some equally critical issue that defendant’s will go to great links to keep that hidden this presents a great challenge for the legal team dealing with a defendant that is mentally ill and does not agree. It also mentions the Dusky standard as a guideline to follow in judging competency that up held by the courts. It also states the “two-prong standard, but states varied in adopting the explicit-rationality component. The American Academy of Psychiatry and the law (AAPL) Practice Guideline on Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial.” Reisner, D., Andrew, Piel, Jennifer, & Makey, Miller Competency to Stand Trail and Defendants Who Lack Insight into Their Mental Illness Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online March 2013, 41(1) 85-91; www.jaapl.org/content/41/1/85 Then it goes on inform read about waiving the insanity defense. State that in the following jurisdictions Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming allows the court’s authority to enlist the insanity defense on a criminal…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I say this because, self-defense is the defense of one’s person or interests, especially through the use of physical force. What took place on March 5, 1770 is an example of self-defense. The British troops were under serious threat by a mob of colonists who were throwing various things and screaming threats at them. In result, the British troops acted by opening fire and ended up killing five colonists. This clearly shows that the British soldiers had to take action and defend themselves. This shooting was not planned and had only took place because of how the colonists behaved. There are endless reasons why this event was an act of self-defense rather than a massacre, murder or manslaughter. Boston Massacre? More like Boston…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Brown was an 18 year old African American teenager, who was fatally shot by Darren Wilson a white ferguson police officer. Darren wasn’t charged because of the Stand Your Ground law. A Stand Your Ground law is a law that authorizes a person to protect and defend one’s life and limb against threat or perceived threat. This law states that an individual has no duty to retreat from any place he or she has a lawful right to be and may use any level of force, including lethal, if he or she reasonably believes he or she faces an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death. Although some people may believe that the stand your ground law is just and fair,Many people could take advantage of the law by causing unnecessary harm to people, There for the Stand Your Ground law should be abolished.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NRA Arguments

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - Court approval of common law rule that a person 'may repel force by force' in selfdefense and concluded that when attacked a person 's as entitled to stand his ground and meet any attack made upon him with a deadly weapon, in such a way and with such force' as needed to prevent 'great bodily injury or death's'.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cja 354: Criminal Capacity

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    115). When one has committed an act of violence, he or she naturally wants to justify the reasons. For many who commit a criminal act the best defense is justification. According to the author, some examples of justification can be, “self-defense, necessity, and defense of others (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 116). Self-defense is when “a person has fundamental right to protect his or her self and that to rationally safeguard oneself from an illegal assault is a natural response when faced with a threatening situation” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 119). Necessity is a claim made by the defense, in which, “the defendant believed it was necessary to behave illegally to prohibit or deter a greater damage or injury” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 116). The defense of others occurs when one person defends another who appears to be in harm’s way (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 126). However, as the author states, “defense of others is sometimes called “defense of a third person,” is circumscribed in some jurisdictions by the alter ego rule” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 126). The defense of others can be tricky because it does not mean one can intervene in an altercation of one’s friend when that friend started the altercation itself. The alter ego rule is accepted in some jurisdictions but not in others. The alter ego rule, as stated by Schmalleger (2010), is that “some jurisdictions will hold that an individual can solely protect a third party under certain conditions and solely to the degree in which the third party could perform for his or her own benefit” (pg. 126). For example, the state of Texas, based on the Model Penal Code ignores acknowledgement this rule by allowing an individual to defend another person if, “he or she has a rational…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Self-Defense Law

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Self-defense laws, also known as “stand your ground laws”, have been a significant aspect of many court cases. However, like most other laws, these laws can be used improperly and cause excess controversy around a case. Joe Palazzolo and Rob Barry’s article titled “More Killings Called Self-Defense” from the March 31st edition of Wall Street Journal brings attention to these self-defense laws. The case discussed in the article is an example of self-defense laws causing controversy, as many protestors believe these laws were used improperly. This is also a common issue as the number of justifiable homicides seems to be on the rise. Are these “stand your ground laws” truly being abused? This is the main issue causing the debate surrounding cases around the country.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    PS M122B / ENV M161 2013 Paper #1 Frayman, Daniel Issue: Affirmative Action After reviewing two distinct sources, Wikipedia and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP), on the issue of affirmative action, it is evident of the disparities regarding the content in each. These differences arise from the fact that Wikipedia is a “bottom up” foundation where its articles are created and edited by random public volunteers while SEP is considered a “top down” encyclopedia that has its information written and released by experts or scholars only. When comparing coverage and treatment of a highly debated topic in affirmative action between an open- and expert-curated source, readers would notice the overall variation in the particular content displayed…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An affirmative defense occurs in a civil lawsuit or criminal charge, and is a fact or set of facts other than those alleged by the plaintiff/prosecutor. If the fact(s) are proven by the defendant, then it defeats/mitigates any legal consequences that the defendant was accused of. One example is trying to prove that insanity was the cause of the crime committed. Another example is that Self Defense was the cause of the crime committed. Affirmative defenses are not too successful, especially in the case of an insanity plea. Only a small fraction is successful in the insanity plea, and even when successful the defendant ends up spending around the same time in a psychological…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When an emergency situation, a person may feel they are forced to behave in a criminal manner, yet later find they are in trouble with the law for doing so. The person behaved in this manner believing their actions would prevent a greater harm, and this is referred to as necessity. In contrast, duress is when a person is threatened with either economic or physical harm and behaves in a criminal manner to protect themselves against this harm. Both may be used by Washtenaw County criminal defense attorneys in criminal cases, but this is rarely the case. What does this type of defense involve and what must be proven in order for it to be successful?…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays