Examples Of Calpurnia In Julius Caesar
Based on his thoughts and actions, how would you describe Caesar?
In Act II Julius Caesar is barraged with warnings to stay home and not go to the Senate, but he ignores them. Calpurnia, his spouse, tells of a dream she had and fears for Caesar's safety. The priests also warn Caesar. However, Decius is able to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate that morning. Considering his actions and thoughts in Act II, Caesar is a ruler who rejects superstitions and is concerned about how he is perceived by others.
As scene 2 opens, there is a thunder storm that sets an eerie tone. Calpurnia reveals her dream to Caesar and expresses concern for his safety. She then warns Caesar to stay home. Julius replies that the work of the mighty gods can not be avoided. He also contends that death is inescapable and therefore he will go to the Senate. His servant thereupon returns with the news that the priests likewise warn Caesar not to go out that morning. Caesar also discards the advice of the priests and asserts his bravery and superiority over others. Eventually, Calpurnia persuades him to stay at home. This shows Caesar as a man who is willing to set aside his priorities to please his wife. …show more content…
Once Decius enters Julius is content to stay home.
However, Decius manipulates Calpurnia's dream into a positive one and starts to question Caesar's manhood and power because he is afraid of the hallucinations of his wife. Caesar is now afraid and concerned of what the senators will think of him and fears that will see him as weak. This convinces Caesar to dismiss the warnings of his wife and the priests and go to the
Senate.
From his statements Caesar first concedes to his wife but once his considers the thoughts of others about him he decides to 'save face' and attend the senate.
Compare and contrast the motives that Brutus and Cassius have for wanting to kill Caesar.
Brutus and Cassius, both conspirators against Caesar both have dramatically different views on the reasons why Caesar should be assassinated. Brutus is a main of morals, reason and honor while Cassius is deceitful and manipulative. Brutus seeks to glorify Rome and avoid tyranny by assassinating Caesar. Cassius wants to destroy his enemy and severely dislikes being under the control of a tyrant. As leaders in the Senate, Brutus and Cassius confederate to assassinate Julius Caesar.
Brutus has high standing in the senate and is revered by other members as a great leader with outstanding ethics. He is always willing to place Rome above himself and says he would give his life to save Rome from tyranny. Cassius, on the other hand, is more concerned about himself being ruled by a tyrant than Rome. He is not a very honorable man but is very intelligent and contriving.
Cassius exhibits himself as a follower of Machiavellian principles by declaring that Antony should be killed along with Caesar and suggesting that the conspirators take an oath. Brutus objects by saying that Antony does not pose a threat and excess bloodshed is unnecessary, this supports Brutus' assertion that Caesar is the only threat to Rome. Cassius wishes to expand the coup and eliminate all of his enemies under the claim that it is for the best of Rome and objects to this.
Brutus and Cassius are alike in the fact that they are both in the Roman senate. They both also detest tyrants and in some part wish the best for Rome. However, Brutus feels that his actions are necessary to sustain free rule in Rome while Cassius sees freedom for Rome as an extra in the assassination. Brutus is a respectable and honorable man who would give his life for Rome, while Cassius is deceitful and wishes to push his agenda.
What do the conspirators think they have achieved by killing Caeser? Do you agree? Why or why not?
The conspirators think that by killing Caesar they have ended tyranny, freed Rome and punished Caesar for his aspiration to be king. I strongly disagree with their thoughts. They assassinated a great leader of Rome who could have led them to renowned victories and fame. Even though Caesar may have desired to be king he still would have respected and honored his subjects by treating them with benevolence. Once they killed him they subjected to Rome to possible anarchy and unrest, and possible conquest by enemies. They also exhibited to the people that they are underhanded and could conspire against the people of Rome.
It should never be the position of elected people to resort to assassination to further justice. The senators should have confronted Caesar and exposed him to the people instead of resorting to death. By killing the leader of the Roman empire they let Rome open to attack by enemies of the state. The conspirators risked not only their lives but the lives of the people and the survival of the state.
I also disagree with the way in which the assassination was carried out. If they were in deed seeking to glorify the state and eliminate tyranny that could have killed Caesar at his home, but instead they delayed until he was in the senate building. Furthermore, if they wanted to avoid revenge, and keep the state "free" that should also have eliminated Caesar's friends and associates. Instead, they chose to let Antony live.
I think that their conspiracy was doomed from the beginning. It was the wrong thing to do and left Rome vulnerable to attack. Also, they left themselves susceptible to revenge from Marc Antony. Instead of resorting to assassination, they should have let the people decide if they wanted a rebellion.
In Antony's funeral oration, he abides by his agreement with Brutus not to place blame on the conspirators. However, he manages to turn the mob against the conspirators. How does he do this? Use examples from the speech to support your answers.
Antony uses many rhetorical tricks to persuade the people to go against the conspirators and support him and Caeser's goals. Marc Antony is a respectable man and is himself honorable, but most importantly he has mastered the art of rhetoric. Antony states in his speech that "[Brutus] Hath told you Caesar was ambitious", and then Antony retorts with "I thrice presented him [Caesar] a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse." By doing that, Antony carefully rebuts Brutus' statement that Caesar was ambitious and starts turning the crowd against the conspirators.
Throughout his speech Antony continues with his pledge to the conspirators by calling them "honorable men", but the crowd feels a sense of sarcasm each time his calls them that. He then says "You [the crowd] all did love him once, not without cause. What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?" This rhetorical question goes against Brutus by questioning his speech in which he so greatly demonized and demeaned Caesar. Now the crowd is starting to turn against the conspirators and follow Antony.
Antony then teases the crowd with Caesar's will, which the beg him to read, but he refuses. Antony tells the crowd to "have patience" and expresses his feeling that he will "wrong the honorable men whose daggers have stabbed Caesar" if he is to read the will. The crowd yells out "they were traitors. 'Honorable men" and have at this time completely turned against the conspirators and are inflamed about Caeser's death.
To refute Brutus' claim that Caesar was a heartless tyrant Antony recounts "how dearly he [Caesar] loved him [Brutus]. Next, Antony humbles himself as "no orator, as Brutus is" hinting that Brutus used trickery in his speech to deceive the crowd. After that Antony deals his final blow by revealing to the crowd Caeser's will, in which "To every Roman citizen he gives, to every several man seventy-five drachmas" as well as land. He then asks the crowd, "Here was a Caesar, when comes such another?" , which questions the conspirators ability to lead. Finally, Antony releases the crowd and utters, "Now let it work. Mischief, thou art afoot. Take thou course thou wilt." After this the crowd riots and searches out the traitors in an attempt to kill them.
Even though in his speech Antony never directly calls the conspirators traitors, he is able to call them "honorable" in a sarcastic manner that the crowd is able to understand. He starts out by citing that Caeser had refused the crown three times, which refutes the conspirators main cause for killing Caesar. He reminds them of Caesar's kindness and love for all, humanizing Caesar as innocent. Next he teases them with the will until they demand he read it, and he reveals Caesar's 'gift' to the citizens. Finally, Marc Antony, leaves them with the question was there ever a greater one than Caesar?, which infuriates the crowd. Marc Antony is able to eloquently manipulate the crowd through remarkable rhetoric skills and turn them against the 'honorable men.' His speech was truly one of the most renowned and premium example of articulation and delivery.
Compare and contrast the characters of Caesar and Cassius
In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare carefully molds the characters of Caesar and Cassius to create rivalry and jealousy. Caesar, the emperor of Rome is vain, easily flattered and modestly superstitious. Those characteristics leave him susceptible to his inevitable assassination. Cassius has the unique ability to interpret human nature and thought. Cassius also envies Caesar even though he has a severe dislike for him. These two characters compete in a struggle for power in Rome and their faults eventually lead to their downfall.
Caesar is not content being emperor and desires to be crowned king. His main fault is that he feels that he is superior to others and not mortal, but divine and indestructible. Cassius also feels that Caesar is extremely powerful and that nobles have the responsibility to stop Caesar. As emperor, Julius Caesar has ruled as a mild tyrant with qualities that Cassius despises, even though Cassius is himself corrupt and over taxing. Both Caesar and Cassius both confide in and show great companionship and camaraderie in key leaders, Marc Antony and Brutus, respectively.
Cassius has a distinguished ability to understand the true meaning behind the statements that his colleagues deliver. Caesar, on the other hand, is easily flattered and not very perceptive of the evil that is all around him. Caesar is by no means consistent in his superstitions. This is confirmed when he asks Antony to cure Calpurnia's sterility but then dismisses the prophecy of the soothsayer. Meanwhile, Cassius remains constant in his dislike of Caesar and plot to assassinate him.
It is intriguing that Shakespeare creates Caesar and Cassius so that their flaws bring about their demise. Caesar's inability to recognize his mortality and understand the foreshadowing of his death lead to his assassination. Cassius hates Caesar and cites Caesar's evil ambitions and actions as the need for assassination. However, Cassius has much the actions and ambitions as Caesar did. Both Caesar and Cassius affiliate themselves with people who are both strong in character, leadership and noble (Antony and Brutus). Caesar and Cassius complement each others' style and are renowned for their rivalry. The two leaders both exhibit extraordinary leadership abilities, but their inabilities and uncertainties cost them their lives.
In Act II Julius Caesar is barraged with warnings to stay home and not go to the Senate, but he ignores them. Calpurnia, his spouse, tells of a dream she had and fears for Caesar's safety. The priests also warn Caesar. However, Decius is able to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate that morning. Considering his actions and thoughts in Act II, Caesar is a ruler who rejects superstitions and is concerned about how he is perceived by others.
As scene 2 opens, there is a thunder storm that sets an eerie tone. Calpurnia reveals her dream to Caesar and expresses concern for his safety. She then warns Caesar to stay home. Julius replies that the work of the mighty gods can not be avoided. He also contends that death is inescapable and therefore he will go to the Senate. His servant thereupon returns with the news that the priests likewise warn Caesar not to go out that morning. Caesar also discards the advice of the priests and asserts his bravery and superiority over others. Eventually, Calpurnia persuades him to stay at home. This shows Caesar as a man who is willing to set aside his priorities to please his wife. …show more content…
Once Decius enters Julius is content to stay home.
However, Decius manipulates Calpurnia's dream into a positive one and starts to question Caesar's manhood and power because he is afraid of the hallucinations of his wife. Caesar is now afraid and concerned of what the senators will think of him and fears that will see him as weak. This convinces Caesar to dismiss the warnings of his wife and the priests and go to the
Senate.
From his statements Caesar first concedes to his wife but once his considers the thoughts of others about him he decides to 'save face' and attend the senate.
Compare and contrast the motives that Brutus and Cassius have for wanting to kill Caesar.
Brutus and Cassius, both conspirators against Caesar both have dramatically different views on the reasons why Caesar should be assassinated. Brutus is a main of morals, reason and honor while Cassius is deceitful and manipulative. Brutus seeks to glorify Rome and avoid tyranny by assassinating Caesar. Cassius wants to destroy his enemy and severely dislikes being under the control of a tyrant. As leaders in the Senate, Brutus and Cassius confederate to assassinate Julius Caesar.
Brutus has high standing in the senate and is revered by other members as a great leader with outstanding ethics. He is always willing to place Rome above himself and says he would give his life to save Rome from tyranny. Cassius, on the other hand, is more concerned about himself being ruled by a tyrant than Rome. He is not a very honorable man but is very intelligent and contriving.
Cassius exhibits himself as a follower of Machiavellian principles by declaring that Antony should be killed along with Caesar and suggesting that the conspirators take an oath. Brutus objects by saying that Antony does not pose a threat and excess bloodshed is unnecessary, this supports Brutus' assertion that Caesar is the only threat to Rome. Cassius wishes to expand the coup and eliminate all of his enemies under the claim that it is for the best of Rome and objects to this.
Brutus and Cassius are alike in the fact that they are both in the Roman senate. They both also detest tyrants and in some part wish the best for Rome. However, Brutus feels that his actions are necessary to sustain free rule in Rome while Cassius sees freedom for Rome as an extra in the assassination. Brutus is a respectable and honorable man who would give his life for Rome, while Cassius is deceitful and wishes to push his agenda.
What do the conspirators think they have achieved by killing Caeser? Do you agree? Why or why not?
The conspirators think that by killing Caesar they have ended tyranny, freed Rome and punished Caesar for his aspiration to be king. I strongly disagree with their thoughts. They assassinated a great leader of Rome who could have led them to renowned victories and fame. Even though Caesar may have desired to be king he still would have respected and honored his subjects by treating them with benevolence. Once they killed him they subjected to Rome to possible anarchy and unrest, and possible conquest by enemies. They also exhibited to the people that they are underhanded and could conspire against the people of Rome.
It should never be the position of elected people to resort to assassination to further justice. The senators should have confronted Caesar and exposed him to the people instead of resorting to death. By killing the leader of the Roman empire they let Rome open to attack by enemies of the state. The conspirators risked not only their lives but the lives of the people and the survival of the state.
I also disagree with the way in which the assassination was carried out. If they were in deed seeking to glorify the state and eliminate tyranny that could have killed Caesar at his home, but instead they delayed until he was in the senate building. Furthermore, if they wanted to avoid revenge, and keep the state "free" that should also have eliminated Caesar's friends and associates. Instead, they chose to let Antony live.
I think that their conspiracy was doomed from the beginning. It was the wrong thing to do and left Rome vulnerable to attack. Also, they left themselves susceptible to revenge from Marc Antony. Instead of resorting to assassination, they should have let the people decide if they wanted a rebellion.
In Antony's funeral oration, he abides by his agreement with Brutus not to place blame on the conspirators. However, he manages to turn the mob against the conspirators. How does he do this? Use examples from the speech to support your answers.
Antony uses many rhetorical tricks to persuade the people to go against the conspirators and support him and Caeser's goals. Marc Antony is a respectable man and is himself honorable, but most importantly he has mastered the art of rhetoric. Antony states in his speech that "[Brutus] Hath told you Caesar was ambitious", and then Antony retorts with "I thrice presented him [Caesar] a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse." By doing that, Antony carefully rebuts Brutus' statement that Caesar was ambitious and starts turning the crowd against the conspirators.
Throughout his speech Antony continues with his pledge to the conspirators by calling them "honorable men", but the crowd feels a sense of sarcasm each time his calls them that. He then says "You [the crowd] all did love him once, not without cause. What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?" This rhetorical question goes against Brutus by questioning his speech in which he so greatly demonized and demeaned Caesar. Now the crowd is starting to turn against the conspirators and follow Antony.
Antony then teases the crowd with Caesar's will, which the beg him to read, but he refuses. Antony tells the crowd to "have patience" and expresses his feeling that he will "wrong the honorable men whose daggers have stabbed Caesar" if he is to read the will. The crowd yells out "they were traitors. 'Honorable men" and have at this time completely turned against the conspirators and are inflamed about Caeser's death.
To refute Brutus' claim that Caesar was a heartless tyrant Antony recounts "how dearly he [Caesar] loved him [Brutus]. Next, Antony humbles himself as "no orator, as Brutus is" hinting that Brutus used trickery in his speech to deceive the crowd. After that Antony deals his final blow by revealing to the crowd Caeser's will, in which "To every Roman citizen he gives, to every several man seventy-five drachmas" as well as land. He then asks the crowd, "Here was a Caesar, when comes such another?" , which questions the conspirators ability to lead. Finally, Antony releases the crowd and utters, "Now let it work. Mischief, thou art afoot. Take thou course thou wilt." After this the crowd riots and searches out the traitors in an attempt to kill them.
Even though in his speech Antony never directly calls the conspirators traitors, he is able to call them "honorable" in a sarcastic manner that the crowd is able to understand. He starts out by citing that Caeser had refused the crown three times, which refutes the conspirators main cause for killing Caesar. He reminds them of Caesar's kindness and love for all, humanizing Caesar as innocent. Next he teases them with the will until they demand he read it, and he reveals Caesar's 'gift' to the citizens. Finally, Marc Antony, leaves them with the question was there ever a greater one than Caesar?, which infuriates the crowd. Marc Antony is able to eloquently manipulate the crowd through remarkable rhetoric skills and turn them against the 'honorable men.' His speech was truly one of the most renowned and premium example of articulation and delivery.
Compare and contrast the characters of Caesar and Cassius
In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare carefully molds the characters of Caesar and Cassius to create rivalry and jealousy. Caesar, the emperor of Rome is vain, easily flattered and modestly superstitious. Those characteristics leave him susceptible to his inevitable assassination. Cassius has the unique ability to interpret human nature and thought. Cassius also envies Caesar even though he has a severe dislike for him. These two characters compete in a struggle for power in Rome and their faults eventually lead to their downfall.
Caesar is not content being emperor and desires to be crowned king. His main fault is that he feels that he is superior to others and not mortal, but divine and indestructible. Cassius also feels that Caesar is extremely powerful and that nobles have the responsibility to stop Caesar. As emperor, Julius Caesar has ruled as a mild tyrant with qualities that Cassius despises, even though Cassius is himself corrupt and over taxing. Both Caesar and Cassius both confide in and show great companionship and camaraderie in key leaders, Marc Antony and Brutus, respectively.
Cassius has a distinguished ability to understand the true meaning behind the statements that his colleagues deliver. Caesar, on the other hand, is easily flattered and not very perceptive of the evil that is all around him. Caesar is by no means consistent in his superstitions. This is confirmed when he asks Antony to cure Calpurnia's sterility but then dismisses the prophecy of the soothsayer. Meanwhile, Cassius remains constant in his dislike of Caesar and plot to assassinate him.
It is intriguing that Shakespeare creates Caesar and Cassius so that their flaws bring about their demise. Caesar's inability to recognize his mortality and understand the foreshadowing of his death lead to his assassination. Cassius hates Caesar and cites Caesar's evil ambitions and actions as the need for assassination. However, Cassius has much the actions and ambitions as Caesar did. Both Caesar and Cassius affiliate themselves with people who are both strong in character, leadership and noble (Antony and Brutus). Caesar and Cassius complement each others' style and are renowned for their rivalry. The two leaders both exhibit extraordinary leadership abilities, but their inabilities and uncertainties cost them their lives.