Examples Of Extreme Utilitarianism

Extreme utilitarianism has a common-sense approach to moral dilemmas. As is the case when confronting the moral dilemma of euthanasia. The extreme utilitarian looks at euthanasia on a case by case basis. They will use reason to determine whether euthanasia is the right decision to make, and under what circumstances. For example, if the person is clearly suffering, with certain death fast approaching, euthanasia would be the most humane choice, and therefore the right action to take. Moral rules are “rules of thumb”, to be used as mere guidelines, which may, or may not fit the circumstances. In the article, Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism, J.J.C. Smart states that the utilitarian will “test individual actions by their consequences.” The extreme utilitarian considers what decision will have the best outcome for society. When breaking a rule, has far better consequences than adhering to the rule, surely the best answer will be to break the rule.
It describes, in vivid detail, the sort of pain Jack was enduring, and the treatments used to ease his pain. It gives further details of witnessing such pain and the alternative efforts to ease his pain from those around him. In this story, written by Stewart Alsop, the witnessing of extreme pain makes a compelling argument for the support of euthanasia. Alsop reasons, “If Jack were a dog, what would be done with him?” Indeed, if Jack were a dog, he would not be allowed to suffer such pain when the result is unquestionably imminent death. As human beings, our compassion would compel us to intercede and put an end to his suffering. The utilitarian argues in favor of the action that will reduce misery and promote happiness (Rachels). Euthanasia falls into the category of reducing misery, and by reducing misery, we are essentially promoting