Preview

Examples Of Framing The Problem As An Advocate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
357 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Framing The Problem As An Advocate
In Chapter 3 of "Writing public policy: a practical guide to communicating in the policy making process" by Catherine F. Smith, she evaluates the concept of framing the problem as an advocate. Throughout this post, I will discuss what framing the problem means, break down key parts of this concept, and illustrate examples.

What does Framing the Problem as an Advocate mean?
Framing is a way of presenting a problem or issue in a certain way that it gets on the policy agenda and being an advocate for this problem or issue can help achieve this purpose. How a person frames the problem should reflect upon who the audience is, and their interest. For example, if an Arkansas state lawmaker is a victim's right advocate, and is wanting to pass a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Why is the audience important in argument? What types of positions might an audience initially hold?…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The tactics used in communications between people is more important than what is being said. Why is it some arguments that seem simple in concept can be so hard to win? Perhaps the opponent was more articulate, more capable of supporting their stance, or perhaps something was said in a way that upset the audience. Many tools for winning an argument can be utilized to defeat the opponent. An excellent example can be seen when comparing “What You Eat Is Your Business” by Radley Balko and “The Supermarket: Prime Real Estate” by Marion Nestle. Balko addresses personal responsibility, or maybe the lack of personal responsibility, in society today. He brings light to changes in legislation, the trends of minimal personal responsibility for dietary choices and the impacts on the lives of people based on others poor choices. Nestle makes similar points with a very technical introspective look into the…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In every argument, you need a tool to use to help you persuade the audience. Argument by character (ethos), argument by…

    • 2276 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FRAMING: The way an issue is posed; how an issue is framed can significantly affect decisions and judgments.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Frank Luntz Framing Theory

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Framing Theory is a concept of “cognitive categorization,” with the basis that “meaning depends on context” (Scheufele 1999, Changingminds.org). Under the framing theory, an audience’s attention is drawn to events or issues placed within a frame, or a field of meaning, rather than on a particular topic. Although this sounds very similar to that of the Agenda Setting theory, framing is often a conscious choice by the media who act as gatekeepers, organizing and presenting these events and topics to the general public. When the frame, or surrounding elements, of a topic changes so does the meaning of the topic.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is the problem or what is trying to be solved. In an exigence, there are some guidelines that one must follow in order to solve the problem through the use of rhetoric. The issue must be one that can be altered through the use of communication. It cannot be a natural disaster, or death as Bitzer quotes. One must be able to control and manage how we respond to the problem through the use of language in order for the issue to be an…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP GOV

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Framing: the power to decide how political events and results are interpreted by the American people…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quiz 1 Review

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Know and be able to differentiate between all these definitions: argumentation, argument, advocacy, power, public discourse, pluralistic culture, values, rule of reason, and procedures. Argumentation: the cooperative activity of developing and advancing arguments and of responding to the arguments of others. Argument: a claim advanced with a reason or reasons in its support. Advocacy: the activity of producing or opposing an idea in public settings. “ex: a recycling should be mandatory” power: plays in democratic decision-making process; the capacity to wield influence, to shape important decisions that affect the lives of others. Public discourse: open discussion of those issues that potentially affect everyone, power also need not to have the last word. Pluralistic culture: a society composed of groups who see the world from different perspectives, value different activities, hold disparate religious beliefs, and aspire to different goals. Values: deeply held a moral commitments acquired from family, cultural background, religious training, and personal experience. “ex: values for privacy, free speech and so on. Rule of reason: the agreement to engage in the cooperative process of argumentation rather than to resolve disagreement by other means. Procedures: the rules or guidelines according to which argumentation will take place.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discussion Board

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    through an issue from metaethical position all the way to choice of what to do.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) An argument should be focused on winning over an audience rather than beating them…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Situation

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When one hears the word Rhetorical Situation, they may tend to be confused, because Rhetoric theory isn’t nessacarily a situation, but much more complex than that. If you look at the word Rhetoric, it’s function is ultimately to perform a task by altering or changing the world we live in. rhetoric, can be seen as a manner of changing reality, not directly by the energy of oneself to others, but by creating discourse, in which causes, or persuades others to become so engaged that they facilitate change. In is apperant that rhetoric is always persuasive and convincing. Rhetorical situation can be beheld as a natural perspective of persons, events, objects, and relations. There are three different construients of any rhetorical situation which are exigence, Audience and contraints. Exigence is a sense of urgency or the obstacle that is in need of being overcame and completed. An exigence is rhetorical when it is capable of positive modification which requires discourse or can be assisted by discourse. The audience is whom the individual is trying to sway, and will greatly affect, their dialect, content, and overall angle. Contraint have the ability to limit decisions and actions needed to modify the exigence. Standard sources of constraint include beliefs, attitudes, documents, facts, traditions, images, interests, and motives. A speaker at a democratic rally wouldn’t share their favorable views for the republican party. Likewise a monologue for a talk show would not run longer than five minutes.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After you analyze the relationship between the speaker to the subject, audience to speaker, and audience to subject the writer is going to have to make some strategic choices.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    appreciate the importance of looking at an issue from a variety of points of view and of recognizing the complexity that surrounds most controversial issues; and…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Insite Essay

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many researchers have found that the news media, now more than ever, have a huge influence on how ordinary citizens think and view the world. The way in which the media frames an event or socially constructed issue will determine how the average person views the problem. Framing is selecting “some aspects of a perceived reality and mak[ing] them more salient in a communicating text, in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment recommendation for the item described”(Robert Entman 391). In other words framing is the practice of influencing how people think and feel about issues by encouraging them to think about them in a particular way. This is done with a discursive language that appeals to images and values that people know and understand deeply. In my news media framing assignment I will be analyzing how the news has portrayed and framed InSite – The only safe injection site for drug addicts in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver B.C. I will do this by firstly by examining the issues being framed by the news media and what authoritative figures are being addressed on the issues. Secondly I will address where the media places and constructs the article to influence the reader. And finally I will argue why this issue is important and look at how the media uses authoritative figures and facts to persuade the reader to believe one side of the issue. This will be made possible by analyzing 14 articles that discuss the controversy of the safe injection sites.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When speaking to an audience there are three things that are essential to the speech that will engage the audience: speaking loudly, enunciating, and eye contact. In addition to those three points, when presenting to an audience an argumentative speech it is important to also do the following: repeating phrases, making the points easy to follow, and explaining technical jargon. Gloria gave a speech on why one should not give money to the homeless and instead give to a charity or organization that supports the homeless. I understood her argument however her points were difficult to follow. She also made assumptions about homeless people and their abilities to receive jobs on behalf of a charity or organization.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays