seems to be a more sinister nature lying between the poem’s lines. He is boastful at times, selfish, and sometimes even cruel in his words. There is not an in depth description of King Hrethal in the poem, however because he mourns so deeply for his sons, the reader sympathizes with his circumstance and admires him more than anyone else in the play, including Beowulf. The area under the rule of King Hrethel also does not seem to know what action to take as the King mourns. They do not come to comfort Hrethel and they do not lose any sleep over what has occurred and how this event may be affecting the King. The people of this kingdom do not even seem to care about the loss of the two sons; the king is “alone in his longing” while the citizens continue on with their lives as if nothing has changed (2460). They do not think of their future heir’s deaths as a loss, just a part of destiny that cannot be undone. Maybe this accident was divinely ordained, but the lack of evidence of grieving is not human. It may be hammered into the people that outward grieving is not an appropriate response to any event, that only the drive to fight on is, but it is unrealistic that they could suppress this naturally human response so completely. They have been trained to hide any and all emotions. It is not so much the people as a whole that are monstrous but the people who decided that emotions are not to be seen, heard, discussed or acknowledged.
seems to be a more sinister nature lying between the poem’s lines. He is boastful at times, selfish, and sometimes even cruel in his words. There is not an in depth description of King Hrethal in the poem, however because he mourns so deeply for his sons, the reader sympathizes with his circumstance and admires him more than anyone else in the play, including Beowulf. The area under the rule of King Hrethel also does not seem to know what action to take as the King mourns. They do not come to comfort Hrethel and they do not lose any sleep over what has occurred and how this event may be affecting the King. The people of this kingdom do not even seem to care about the loss of the two sons; the king is “alone in his longing” while the citizens continue on with their lives as if nothing has changed (2460). They do not think of their future heir’s deaths as a loss, just a part of destiny that cannot be undone. Maybe this accident was divinely ordained, but the lack of evidence of grieving is not human. It may be hammered into the people that outward grieving is not an appropriate response to any event, that only the drive to fight on is, but it is unrealistic that they could suppress this naturally human response so completely. They have been trained to hide any and all emotions. It is not so much the people as a whole that are monstrous but the people who decided that emotions are not to be seen, heard, discussed or acknowledged.