There have been many tragic events during the course of 2012 and the start of 2013 that have sparked many controversial debates. One can conclude from the Sandy Hook massacre in Newtown Connecticut to the marathon bombing in Boston that something must be done, but what exactly must be done is the topic of debate amongst every media outlet known to man. Through the course of this whole gun control and immigration debate, there have been many logical fallacies used by many politicians and people in general to persuade the populace into accepting their position. It is through values-based and reasoning-based fallacies that these news pundits are able to push their political and or personal agenda. The most common logical fallacy in most of these arguments used are generalizations. The argument that I’ve heard most, frequently, is the hasty generalization that our society and legal system is broken, due to a handful of school shootings. Although, the events that took place in Newtown Connecticut are extremely tragic, it does not provide enough data to produce a strong statistical argument like many believe it does. Another “perfect” solution to this “gun violence epidemic” that I’ve heard from the proponents of gun restriction is to completely abolish the use of guns in our society, which, in turn, sparks another fallacious response-the idea that one regulation would lead to many other regulations. This type of reasoning or fallacy is known as a “slippery slope,” because it is saying that the acceptance of one step or action will cause a chain of events that cannot be stopped and whose end result is obviously undesirable. Both sides of the argument also love to throw statistics and use random polls to prove the points that they are trying to make, which leads to them eventually assuming that one thing obviously leads to another, when in fact, virtually every violent social issue has many factors or layers that contribute to the end result. It is through the use of the internet, newspapers and television that people like Bill O’Reilly and Bill Maher are able to push their political and personal agenda by using these various logical fallacies. We, as the consumers of these products, unknowingly develop these same habits whenever we write or argue. The truth is, we all, at some point, fall into fallacious arguments. This very essay contains these very flaw as well. Logical fallacies are used every day even in the products we purchase and utilize. It is up to you to decide whether you buy an expensive fragrance only because the person in the commercial is guaranteed desired attention or not.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Gun Control laws have been discussed more and more now due to more recent tragedies because of gun violence. James Q. Wilson, previous a professor of Pepperdine University, UCLA, and an author of many public policy books, wrote and editorial letter trying to convince his intended audience that if the government passes more gun control laws it will not decrease the gun violence in America as much as society wants to believe it will. The LA Times published this editorial in 2007 and it is still a good resource.…
- 563 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…
- 556 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The scholarly article “Gun Shows and Gun Violence: Fatally Flawed Study Yields Misleading Results” first appeared in the magazine American Journal of Public Health in 2010. It was co-written by Garen Wintemute, David Hemenway, Daniel Webster, Glenn Pierce, and Anthony Braga. In their Journal entry they aim to convince their readers that the widely publicized case study “The Effect of Gun Shows on Gun-Related Deaths: Evidence from California and Texas” is a bunch of nonsense. “We believe the study is fatally flawed”. Toulmin’s Model, along with the three appeals to argument, are techniques frequently applied by the authors used to create their convincing argument.…
- 1099 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Why is gun control the supposed “cure” for crime? Why is there always this need to blame guns for people’s crimes? If this theory is correct, then the belief that pencils cause grammatical errors is also true; wait, that doesn’t sound right, does it? Now, all of a sudden when the “cure” is used in this light it becomes ridiculous. In fact, Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns, and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
For the last couple of years, gun control has continued to be a huge controversial debate in Congress. This argument over whether gun control laws should be strict is nothing new to the world of politics. The ideas of gun control consist of laws that either keep away firearms from people, or allow one to keep guns for personal protection. They also control who the guns are being sold to and who can own them. In America, each state government has passed many gun control laws. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts…
- 214 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
There are many political issues in the world that incite strong emotional reactions from people from all walks of life. These issues can turn the tide of a political campaign because of the emotions involved with them. Quite often, the most emotion inspiring issues are related to individual rights and public safety. A major issue that is constantly debated by opposing interest groups is gun control. This is a topic that creates a firestorm of debate between people all over the country. On one side, there are the gun owners who believe the Second Amendment to the constitution is absolute and that citizens of the United States should be permitted to own any firearms they want. On the other side, there are gun prohibition groups who believe that all firearms should be banned. Both of these points of view are the extreme ends of the spectrum. Most people tend to be in favor of reasonable restrictions on the ownership of firearms. But what is reasonable? There are many examples of…
- 2969 Words
- 12 Pages
Better Essays -
References: Boss, J. (2012). Critical Thinking And Logic Skills For Everyday Life. New York: McGraw-Hill.…
- 358 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“Carrying a concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.” The second amendment and open carry laws give law abiding citizens give those who apply the sense of security, protection, and safety to those who cannot protect themselves. Banning the right to bear arms and the right to openly carry would cause more harm than allowing legal citizens to legally carry firearms for self-defense. Banning guns can cause a major issue in many ways. For example, if you ban public carry of guns, what's gonna happen if a spree shooting takes place in front of you and your unarmed. You have just become a sitting duck. Taking away guns takes away a sense of security for about 11 million citizens trying to protect themselves and their families. “People are safer in states where law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry concealed weapons.” Most parents would do anything to keep their children safe, even give their life for the well-being of their kids. For example, the movie theater shooting in colorado. If a parent and their child were seeing a movie and the parent was armed, they could better their chances to get out alive if they are carrying then sitting and waiting for the police to disarm the criminal. Taking away or not allowing that right to be enacted is increasing the chances of harm more than making the streets safer without guns. “Banning weapons does not guarantee safety.” The saying goes, “A right unexercised, is a right that is lost”…
- 674 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…
- 1133 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
If we enacted more gun control laws then there wouldn't be as much problems. Gun shootings are the main reason why the kill rate is going up. That being the main cause is just something we need to stop. Gun laws are causes of violent crime in the world and it must need to be changed for people to buy guns easier to protect themselves.Gun control will help everyone in the world because it would make the world way safer.If there were more gun control laws enacted the world would be a safer place because more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths. Guns are rarely used in self defense and The presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to become violent.…
- 837 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hundreds of law-abiding citizens were able to take up arms against lawless mobs to defend themselves, their family, their homes, and their businesses. They did the job police simply could not do. Lives were saved. Robberies were prevented. Homes and businesses were defended and left intact all thanks to our constitutional in the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms. The creators of the Constitution realized the importance of guns in American Society. Therefore, the argument against gun control started as long ago as 1789.…
- 1191 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When it comes to individuals supporting gun control, they often don’t see a middle ground between the two. Individuals that support gun control only see guns as the murder not the person holding the gun or pulling the trigger. Often media posts graphs of gun related deaths and injuries on graphs that are not accurate. Individuals don’t do the research to determine what is true or is a fallacy claim of disordered statistics is. More than 60% of all gun related deaths per year are from suicides around 35% are homicide related the other 5% are from accidental deaths. (Pew Research) Guns are not responsible for killing people; the person behind the trigger is the one responsible for killing innocent individuals. When a mass shooting event takes place…
- 514 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Criminals will always find a way to obtain their guns, leaving law-abiding citizens without any weapons to use in defense.…
- 1874 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
My first point is that gun control takes away many people's sense of security. According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year. The police cannot protect everyone all of the time. When a burglar breaks into your home, what would you use to protect yourself? 61% of men and 56% of women surveyed by Pew Research said that stricter gun laws would make it more difficult for people…
- 787 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…
- 822 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays