The officer believed her ex owned the pictures, so he could do what he liked with them. Another
officer told her that because she was over eighteen, nothing could be done. Florida’s cyber harassment law, however, prohibits a willful online ‘course of conduct’ causing the targeted individual substantial emotional distress. It sets no age requirement for victims and does not exclude private videos shared with another person in confidence” (Citron 85). In this example of cyber-harassment, the first law enforcement officer displayed misogynistic social biases towards the female victim and incited a form of victim blaming rational; as if to blame the victim for the harassment that she was experiencing (Citron 49). Furthermore, law enforcement, in this case, also exhibited a lack of education concerning the current laws put in place to protect such victims of harassment (Citron 86). Maybe, the lack of education in misogynistic cyber-bullying is actually the blatant disregard of this subject altogether due to engrained social biases towards women with in the judicial system.