Imagine our beloved nation, that we fought tirelessly to defend from the tyrant king of England. Just to be split like an axe dividing a piece of wood. The conflict between the larger and southern states will grow into much more than just a debate. The Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan will not work and be productive. The Great Compromise will let the nation thrive because it critiques both plans and let’s the north and south work together. Let me explain why James Madison’s plan will not work.…
The continuous spread of different denominations, religious indifference as well as rivalry that existed in the 18th century church or religion became a concern to some Christians. People find it easy to commit sins without any ramose for doing so. Also, the so called enlighten thinker (colonists) who believe in looking for God in nature shifted people’s forces from God to nature instead. Many believers are afraid that genuine Christianity may soon become a thing of the past if nothing is done. In order to deal with this situation, some ministers to focus the non-believers so as to convert them and thereby injecting in them the gospel into their heart instead of their heads.(Roark James. pg. 135)…
Virtue Ethics- Even though Billy did have too much to drink, that does not excuse him from going home and having sex with a woman he just met while he is in a relationship. While being a close friend to both people, Billy and Suzie, and knowing that I can’t stop him, it is my loyal and moral duty to act in a just and kind way which is to tell Suzie. A Virtue Ethics person would suggest that the right thing to do is look at an angelic person. A truthful friend that that doesn’t lie in order to make the situation temporarily better, a reasonable friend that looks at all aspects of the situation, and a friend with integrity and does the right thing when their friends aren’t present. And since cheating and betrayal is not nice to do to friends and is morally wrong in this sense a Virtuous person would say to tell Suzie the situation, since its…
This book Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity by David Entwistle (2010), talks about the incorporation of Christianity, and psychology. He stated, “Primarily psychology and Christianity are perceived by many people to be in opposition.” The two of them address general questions relating to human experiences and life from different angles. Enwistle explains that, “Christianity is based on the Word of God. Psychology’s foundation is supported empirically. Because psychology is empirically based, it does not allow any space for faith or recognition of the supernatural.” Christianity is based on faith and believes the Bible is the foundation of all truth. David Entwistle explained that, “Psychology uses empirical methods of study while theology studies human interpretations of God’s Word.” Entwistle provided a very detailed look at how these two different ways of viewing human behavior can be integrated. The purpose of this book is to assist its readers to completely understand the integration of these two disciplines. Although they appear to be seen as opponents, David Entwistle gives a thorough look at each of them and creates an avenue in which to show how they go together. A great amount of this book covers the examination of the different models used to comprehend the various views of integration. These models are looked at in a manner to let the reader personally recognize and examine their individual way of viewing integration. This book began by taking an in depth look at how our worldviews influence the way in which we think about everything. This includes psychology and Christianity. Entwistle uses the idea of "worldview" to give details on how we are able to look through our window to decide how we see our view as it relates to the world. According to Entwistle (2010), everybody has…
1. What is the difference between self-interest and selfishness? Why is this distinction important when considering the competitive market economy as appropriate for a society?…
have got away from the teaching of Christianity; Christianity showed the teaches of how to treat…
What is it that forms and drives our “moral behaviors”? Are we born with a basic sense of morality or do we develop a set of moral “social codes” to keep society from falling into chaos and anarchy? In her essay “On Morality,” Joan Didion dissects what lies beneath the surface of humanity’s morality. By recounting several stories and historical events, she shows that morality at its basic “most primitive level” is nothing more than “our loyalties to the ones we love,” everything else is subjective.…
In the historic novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Goling, A plane has crashed on an unhabituated island in the Pacific as they are trying to flee from the war. Although at the beginning of the story the boys are obsessed with law and order; but near the end of the book, the boys get into a short-sided and life changing war; just like the United States in 1945. Although the boys, and the US thought they were getting into a smart war they were surly mistaken. The US invading Vietnam was not a smart idea that ended up hurting America for years to come. The invasion put our country in debt, sent our veterans home to have horrible lives, and it caused for the death of millions of innocent civilians and of our soldiers.…
1. What is the difference between self-interest and selfishness? Why is this distinction important when considering the competitive market economy as appropriate for a society?…
This teaching can be used across the board for all worldviews. Although, these are the characteristics of Jesus’ teaching, these characteristics should be used by all. These are great morals that one should have regardless of the worldview.…
The Boston Tea Party is typically viewed as one of the most popular, well-known events of the Revolutionary War. The Boston Tea Party occurred on the night of December 17, 1773. The colonists were fed up with Britain taxing them and trying to regain control. The Boston Tea Party was a direct response to the Tea Act, an act created to save the East India Tea company, left the colonists paying very high taxes on tea. Many people drank tea and enjoyed it very much so it left many of the colonists upset and angry.…
David Entwistle’s (2010) book, Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration, opens the reader’s eyes to unexpected possibilities, beginning with the often combative regimes of faith and reason using Tertullian’s symbolism of Athens as the seat of reason and Jerusalem as the seat of faith; which is the basic ongoing battle between science and religion (Entwistle, 2010). What Entwistle addresses is his belief that integration of the disciple of psychology and Christianity is possible, each contributing to the whole allowing effective therapy, where the therapist becomes a type of shepherd that invites the client into the goodness of God and introduces Christ as his savior. Psychology attempts to understand, describe, and diagnose human behavior but Christian theology seeks to understand “what it means to be human” (Entwistle, 2010, p. 3). In the end Entwistle (2010) reoccurring theme throughout the book is that this integration is possible because “all truth is God’s truth” (p. 13). All the reasoning, precise measurements, and descriptives of psychology are possible because of God’s work in creation.…
Christian therapists are sometimes challenged in their work with appropriately religious clients to develop treatment components that incorporate the Bible. Utilizing a case study format, this article describes various intervention strategies available for the clinician to consider. Psychodynamic, psychoeducational, theoeducational, cognitive, behavioral, and affective experiential therapeutic examples are presented. As long as sound ethical and religio-cultural assessment guidelines are followed, Scripture remains a rich resource for clinicians in their work.…
What is the difference between self-interest and selfishness? Why is this distinction important when considering the competitive market economy as appropriate for a society?…
Many people equate standards and religious convictions with ethical behavior. An individual can have very high standards, honesty, loving, and giving without possessing any devout convictions in God or salvation. As people proceed through life, they have distinct knowledge that may sway standards in an affirmative or contradictory manner. An individual, who is educated to accept as factual that God can mend all sickness if he pleads, may lose belief if the plea is not answered. The same is true if the individual being prayed for is healed of the illness. The individual then accepts as factual that the power of plea is worth extending all through life. God becomes a centered part of the…