Preview

Examples Of Nature Vs Nurture

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Nature Vs Nurture
There has been numerous discussions on the nature vs. nurture topic. One side says that nature, or genes, are responsible for developing children the way that they are, while another side says that nurture, the environment, is responsible. Regardless, nurture is the main cause for “monsters” and their behavior because our peers and family help shape our personality, interests, behavior, and how we act.
One of the most important reasons why nurture is responsible for making “monsters” is that humans shape their lives based on what they perceive to be true from a parental unit/ peer’s words and also a parental units belief. For example, in the novel Darkly Dreaming Dexter by Jeff Lindsay, a young boy named Dexter who is a serial killer is having a conversation with his father, Harry. During this conversation, Harry states, “There are plenty of people who deserve it, Dex…” and Dexter replies with, “And with those few words he
…show more content…
Some may say argue that nature is responsible for creating “monsters” because people are born with a killing gene, the MAO-A gene. However, you have to be involved in something traumatic for it to activate, and that ties into your environment which is a part of nurture. Furthermore, Dexter doesn’t state that he is a “monster” because of a traumatic experience, but because of his father’s words. Likewise, in the personal narrative Charles Manson, Manson states, “My father is the jailhouse. My father is your system. I am only what you made me. I am only a reflection of you.” Manson states that he is a “monster” not because of his father’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein, the main character Victor Frankenstein, becomes obsessed with the notion of bringing a human being to life. The result is the creation of a monster only known to us as 'the monster'. The monster is hideous, and is therefore rejected by Victor and by society to fend for himself. He soon commits many murders, as a result of his dejection, including Frankenstein's younger brother, best friend and newly wed wife. He also set up the killing of Justine. Frankenstein created the monster and then rejected him, but it was the monster who actually did the killings, who was to blame.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Children in school didn't like Bryant and he often claimed they were bullying him and at first glance it would seem that society was to blame. As it turns out, like Frankenstein's creature they were scared of Martin, not for the same reason they were scared of Frankenstein's creature but regardless, their cruelty stemmed from fear. Martins iffy upbringing and the creature’s complete absence of one resulted in both of them responsible for the murders of innocent people. While martin never had a chance, frankenstein did, yes society was the last straw, but we all live in society and the majority of us don't murder so the idea that society creates a monster would make all of us a monster and yes we all have major problems whether we admit or even acknowledge them, they are definitely there. They don't make us monsters, There is always more at play, people are complex and there is never just one reason for our becoming a monster, though in Frankenstein's creatures case the major issue put in simple words was his lack of preparation for society, not society…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the novel Frankenstein, the monster was singled out because of his monstrous looks. The reason he had such looks was because of the unnatural manner of his creation. The monster was created with a mix of stolen body parts and chemicals. One look at the monster would make anyone want to get out of his path. Once the monster came to life he was abandoned by his creator without any direction. He was left to fend for himself and deal with the prejudices that people had without getting to know his situation. The monster also didn 't know how to react to the reactions from people which made him start to commit crimes. The monster said, "I, the miserable and the abandoned, am an abortion, to be spurned at, and kicked, and trampled on" (Shelley 19). This eruption of angry self-pity as the monster questions the injustice of how he has been treated compellingly captures his inner life, giving Walton and the reader a glimpse into the suffering that has motivated his crimes. While the monster was wandering the town he encountered a family, and he learned how to speak by watching them. The monster decided to introduce himself to the family. He decided to do this because the family never turned anyone away that needed assistance. The monster thought, "I dared not think that they would turn them from me with disdain and horror…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    East Of Eden Analysis

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Monsters are not always furry beast that live under the bed. Monsters can be born as human children, hiding behind pretty faces and sweet voices. They are not solely the things found in nightmares, nor do they always leave when the lights turn on. They are real, and can be found in every one of us. The Bible says that every child is born with a seed of evil, that can be traced back to the beginning of biblical times. This seed is original sin, planted in the hearts of humanity by the devil himself. If that seed is let to cultivate, then it can take over a person, and push them toward the path of monstrosity. No matter what your were born as, monster or saint, it is your choice to chose the path you want to take. In the novel East of Eden, John Steinbeck uses both Cal Trask and Cathy Ames to symbolize the evil inside of humanity, and Cal alone as a symbol of humanity's choice to overcome it.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How are monsters created? The question whether people are born evil or are transformed has been around forever. The Creature from Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, and Grendel from Grendel, written by John Gardner, had similar situations. Grendel was a beast who had no communication with humans or any other living creature. He could understand the humans, but they could not understand him. He could not even communicate with his mom because she had forgotten the language long ago. He was isolated from the world and changed because of the occurrences and harm the humans caused him physically and emotionally. The Creature was created by Victor Frankenstein, a driving scientist set on bringing the Creature alive. After successfully completing his experiment Victor was disgusted by him and could not look at his horrifying creation. He abandoned the Creature and left him for dead. The Creature later goes on to be harmed and rejected by many humans and is left to fend for himself in the cruel world. John Locke argues that an individual's mind is a blank slate, without rules for processing…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No longer were monsters a product of supernatural forces, monsters were created. Yet, in order for a monster to become a monster, it cannot exist in isolation. Relating my idea of the connection between knowledge and morality in the Scientific Revolution/Enlightenment period to the monster and his body in Frankenstein, I argue that society’s knowledge of the monster is formed in one of two ways; one, through scientific creation or two, through social construction. Now, it is through (1) physical features which differ drastically from others or (2) immoral actions that one becomes a monster in their own society. In part, “monsters” are products of their own environment. What makes the creature in Frankenstein a monster is that he is both a scientific creation and his physical features and his actions of murder deviate from society’s expectations. Throughout the novel Frankenstein’s creation is never given a real name. Instead, he is called; a “demoniacal corpse, wretch, daemon, devil, monster, ogre, the being and creature” (36, 68, 102, 164, 165). Besides not having a name, Frankenstein’s creature is also described using the term deformity and monster. After society’s constant negative response to his physical appearance, the creature himself…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychologists have long debated the nature versus nurture issue in the shaping of our identities. Are we shaped by our biology or by our environment? This psychological debate is explored in Mary Shelly’s gothic novel, Frankenstein. The novel poses a simple question: Was Frankenstein’s monster inherently an evil creature, or was he made into a killer because of his environment? Shelly’s characterization of Frankenstein’s monster shows that the creature began as a clean slate, but was shaped into a monster by his experiences and isolation.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Some people may think monsters are born, others may think monsters are created. Monsters are created. Evil is made in someone, monsters are not naturally evil. Monsters who are created learn how to lose feeling and not be considerate of the people around them. Which causes them to perform malicious acts. 1 Timothy 4:4 states, “for everything created by God is…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The monster was made as an adult without knowledge. The monster had to teach himself the entire English language as well as learn how to write and learn about the world. With all of the evidence in the novel, we know how intelligent the monster is. The definition of nurture is encouraging the growth or development of someone or something. The monster evidently grew and developed from watching the DeLacey family. The argument against this overlooks the exact definition of nurture. Although the way the monster was nurtured was not ideal for a normal lifestyle, it is still proven that a form of nurture was received.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deep in The Monster’s heart Humans tend to judge everything from the external appearance in regardless of internal essence. This can be seen from the Monster, a character in Frankenstein. When talking about the monster, people often think of malignance, fearfulness, ugliness, and frightening. No one is interested in the real identity of the Monster. In fact, the Monster is a good person.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein not only literally created the creature, but his reaction to his “birth” and subsequent neglect and abuse essentially created the psychological monster. From the moment of animation, Frankenstein was disgusted and repulsed by his creation. Rather than accept his child as he created, he abandons his newborn and all of his parental responsibilities. He never questioned where his abandoned child was and he even wished that the creature were dead. He continually refers to him as a “monster”, “fiend”, “demon” in a verbally abusive…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Victor Frankenstein created a creature who became a monster. Events like this that create monsters occur during the beginning stages of their life. Rejection, abuse, and living with the fact that every time someone encounters the creature that they run in fear. The question is, are monsters born or shaped by their life experiences? Monsters are not born but formed through rejection and abuse.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the time she was writing essays, Kate Chopin was not read nor recognized as a major American literature author. Wrote in 1894, the short novel entitled “The Story of an Hour” was not very successful, and it has not spread out of the area of Louisiana. Although the importance of Kate Chopin in our world does not have to be proved thanks to feminist movements, her literary qualities were overlooked at that time.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the poem “Hope” by Ariel Dorfman the use of irony is what really sets and delivers the mood of this heart wrenching story. The author uses a very straight forward approach in this poem because they are essentially just telling the story, adding loose rhythm and rhyme structure. The best way for the author to get the point of this tragedy across is with subtle but profound irony. The mother and father finding “joy” in this horrible event is the best example of irony.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hmc and Tips Case

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • What do HMC’s capital assumptions imply about the optimal allocation to TIPs and other asset classes in a mean-variance framework? Should Harvard invest its endowment in TIPs?…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays