|Pluralism |is used, often in different ways, across a wide range of topics to denote a diversity of views, and|…
It is much easier to contrast the four contemporary theories of American democracy than to compare them, as pluralist, hyperpluralist, elite and class, and traditional theory each highlights the competitive foundation of politics. Each contemporary theory investigates the underlying question "Who governs our nation" yielding significantly different conclusions. While the pluralist theory emphasizes that politics is merely a competition among groups - a competition overwhelmingly controlled by the wealthy according to elite and class theory - hyperpluralism contends that these groups weaken the political backbone rather than support it. Pluralism and hyperpluralism are similar in that both agree that groups indelibly impact society and therefore the government by pressing their concerns through organized efforts, however they differ as to whether the impact is positive or negative, respectively. Hyperpluralism also contrasts with elite and class theory stating that many groups - not just the elite ones - are so strong that the government is unable to act. It asserts that there are too many ways for groups to control policy, regardless of their organization, topic, or funding. Traditional democratic theory is composed of key principles that an ideal democratic process should consist of: voting must be representative, a population must participate, civic understanding, citizen control of agenda, and inclusion. The majority rule - in which the will of over half the voters is followed - guarantees equality, control, and inclusion, guaranteeing rights to those subject to the laws that follow the policy making process. A key aspect to the theory is equal representation from each citizen, which under hyperpluralist and elite and class theory is thought of as endangered or nullified by the power of groups and the wealthy, respectively. Pluralism suggests that democratic theory is successful because…
A pluralist government is much like the opposite of the elitist government. In a pluralist government the power of decision making and policy making are based more on the wants and needs of many rather than just a few. It is said to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Everyones views are valued regardless of ones position in society. This is similar to the type of government we have…
landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, (1954), that would…
Majority rule is susceptible to abuse by the majority, while groups seeking to reach a consensus may fall victim to groupthink.…
Behavioral Pluralism identifies a certain set of constituency attributes that contribute to the success of advocacy groups such as the Sierra Club. According to Grossmann’s theory these constituency attributes dictate advocacy groups like the Sierra Club’s…
While I agree that pluralism is an important subject that benefits from the kind of attention given to it in the book, I believe the length of the book and the comprehensive nature of the material presented can make it difficult to follow at times. Furthermore, on several occasions the author seemed to move to the wider margins of the topic. However, as the implications of pluralism are pertinent and its integration with postmodernism significant, the information was extremely beneficial.…
According to Madison factions create “instability, injustice, confusion and violence.” By factions federalist No. 10 clearly states “a number of citizens, whether they amount to a majority or a minority of the whole. The two main groups that Madison refers to are the minority and majority groups. The first consisting of “considerate and virtuous citizens.” In other words the wealthy and well educated privileged persons. The latter being “an interested and overbearing majority ”consisting mostly of day-to-day laborers poor in education and rich in numbers. Factions are formed because people are either united or separated by common interest regarding their own and the rights of other citizens. Factions are formed over issues like private faith, personal liberty… Madison admits that the first object of government is to protect the diversity in the faculties of men, which enable him to acquire property. This is the main issue responsible of forming factions, the acquisition of property. However men have “unequal faculties of acquiring property.” Madison further explains the existence of factions: “as long as man finds a connection between his reason and self love his opinions and his actions will have an equal influence on each other.” This is why both minority and majority factions are dangerous. Both groups separately pursue and act in favor of their own interest thus creating “unsteadiness and injustice” with in the public administrations.…
· How can we foster a climate of acceptance and cultural pluralism in the United States?…
The Pluralist structure illustrates power as the aftermath of the collection of different interest groups haggling for the lead in the political process arena, which would include the policy making process that involves the dispersing of resources in communities. Pluralists theorist envision the state as a system that maintains consistent influence and protects the positions with in and of the political process exclusively as they engage availability to the anatomy of government. The state also protects who is chosen to office, and manages stability throughout communities. For Pluralist theorists power is distributed throughout the population of single voters who they claim have equal access to dominate with in their individual votes. Pluralist make the accusations that no one particular interest group dominates. The argue that these different interest groups are composed of different organizations with a variation of different interest, objectives and leadership and how they believe power is not concentrated. That in essence explains what and how pluralist structure of government thinks and works.…
Another factor making the political party inferior is its longstanding values, territorial basis restricting it from expansion since political parties aim to accomplish control of legislative. Hence since the legislature is based on a territorial perimeter, the rest of the political party body must follow in this direction. In contrast to some interest groups, political parties have not fully been able to achieve a system which incorporates the public into the policy making process. Pross questioned whether the fragmentation of the political parties endangers long-standing institutions, or if this merely is the politics of the new age. Canada has witnessed the emergence of a new public philosophy “pluralism” started taking the place of the previous representative parliamentary democracy. Pluralism emphasizes the collaboration between government and interest groups. Ideally members of private groups exchange ideas and negotiate with government civil…
The three contemporary theories of American democracy are the pluralist theory, elite and class theory and hyperpluralism. The pluralist theory is a theory of government and politics emphasizing that politics is mainly a competition among groups, each one pressing for its own preferred policies. Pluralist theory describes a society ruled by the opinions of many views which inevitably results in conflicting views. This conflict tends to cancel out any gains made by one side, resulting in a kind of natural equilibrium. An example of pluralist is the inability of the House and the Senate to swiftly come to actions because of Democratic/Republican conflict. The elite and class theory is a theory of government and politics contending that societies are divided along class lines and that an upper-class elite will rule, regardless of the formal niceties of governmental organization. Over a third of the nation's wealth is currently held by just one percent of the American Population. Elite and Class theorists believe that this one percent of Americans controls most policy decisions because they can afford to finance election campaigns and control key institution, such as large corporations. They tend to live in the Northeast and attend exclusive prep schools and Ivy League universities. They tend to belong to mainline Protestant churches and they marry one another. Often members of the elite do not occupy governmental positions themselves, but depend on elected and appointed officials who do their work for them. Hyperplurism is a theory of government and politics contending that groups are so strong that government is weakened. There are several different groups, such as religions, cultural groups, ethnicities or interest groups that the government can't control due to hyperplurism. It is an extreme form of pluralism. An example would have to be the stance on abortion or gay marriage, pertaining to the state's constitution. Some states are passing laws either allowing gay…
10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…
Since the immigrants first arrived from other countries to the United States, they were having a hard in the U.S.A. It is long, hard and painful. They thought they could have a better life in the U.S.A; the true is there was many problems are waiting for them. Because of immigrants usually don’t speak the dominate language of U.S.A, so the only jobs they could do is the lower class job with low paying. So immigrants are having hard time to live in the U.S.A; But sine have more immigrants came to the U.S.A, they started live as a group which is the ethnic enclaves, because of the ethnic enclaves immigrant could speak their mother language and used their mother culture to live in there, and people who live in there still participate with the dominate culture, so they pay tax, talk to the immigration’s officers and many other things. But people who are native American is so stupid to understand the true because they think immigrant are living in the ethnic enclaves and speak the language they don’t speak, so immigrants didn’t participate at all, but the true is not like that and they are wrong. Immigrant believe in the preservation of one’s heritage still able to do the participation in the dominant culture protect the culture from one’s and understand the formation of ethnic enclave, and let them participate in the dominant culture.…
To begin with, California, known worldwide, has a diverse population. For example, California has roots in the cultures of Asia, eastern United States, Mexico, and Spain. To demonstrate, growing up, I had friends who were from different countries or had parents that migrated to the United States. In particular, I had a friend from Thailand that had outdoor shoes and indoor shoes that looked like slippers. Sometimes she would invite me to her house and they would serve a traditional meal from their home country. Pad Thai which is, stir-fried egg noodles with meat is especially one of my favorite dishes. As a result of the abundant, diverse cultures of California my friends have traditions from all over the world which influenced…