Preview

Examples Of Social Control Theory Of Crime

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
416 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Social Control Theory Of Crime
Travis Hirschi developed social control theory to explain why people commit crime. Social control theory explains people commit crimes because of their weak social. If people have a weak social bond then they are more likely to commit crime. People with weak social bonds have less or nothing to lose so committing crime does not seem like a bad choice, and is the most logical way to getting what they want. The average person does not commit crime because they fear that they might lose something. Some examples of things that a person might not want to lose are jobs, relationships, or reputations.
There are four main elements of a social bond attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. These elements are what influence people’s likely hood

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fdr Supreme Court Packing

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of three terms, starting in 1934, the Supreme Court struck down a large part of the Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, provoking a continuing constitutional crisis. President Roosevelt naturally criticized the Court on a number of occasions, the last time in June of 1936; but because of the negative response from Congress and members of the media in those instances, he said nothing about the Court during the 1936 presidential campaign. Supporters of the New Deal proposed a variety of ways of bringing the Court into line with their program, including statutes to require an extraordinary majority of justices to strike down a law, constitutional amendments to mandate retirement at 70 or 75, and so on (Ross 1994, Stephenson 1998). During the 1936 election, Governor Landon and other Republicans attempted to use the Court’s recalcitrance to portray Roosevelt and the Democrats as enemies of the Constitution, liberty, and property. Notwithstanding the barrage of criticism, Roosevelt and the Democrats won a massive landslide in 1936, with the President taking all but two states in the Electoral College and Democrats controlling all but sixteen seats in the Senate and eighty in the House.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi argues that crime is opportunistic and anyone would commit crime if the situation was right and there was little chance of being caught. He says that sociologists should not focus on whypeople commit crime but why more people do not. He maintains that most people are rational in their choices and that there are controls that operate to make most people keep their actions within the bounds of the law. They are, Attachment- commitment to family relationships which could be threatened by criminal acts, Commitment- years of education, building a career, buying a home and aquiring a good reputation, all this could be lost by commiting crime, Involvement- some people are activley involved in community life as volunteers, parentgovernors for schools etc. all this would be jepordized by criminal behaviour.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi's Control Theory

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The thoughts and ideas of this theory were put together in ‘A General theory of crime’ (Michael Gotfredson and Travis Hirschi 1990). This theory is more of a refined control theory than originally presented over 20 years earlier by Hirschi. Within this theory it is stated that crime was claimed to have flowed from low self control. ‘It can be enjoyable because it involves the exercise of agility, deception or power, and it also requires a lack of sympathy for the victim’. But it does not provide long or medium term benefits. In short, it is, they say, likely to be committed by those who are ‘impulsive, insensitive, physical, risk taking, short sighted and non verbal’ (1990:90). Gottfredson and Hirschi argued that the types of people that who become involved in crime also engage in such behaviours that provide ‘short term gratification’…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-control theory theorizes the single most important factor behind crime is an individual’s lack of self-control. This is explored and explained much more in-depth in A General Theory of Crime. In this book, Gottfredson and Hirschi theorized that low self-control is the root to all crime at all times and ultimately the general theory of crime. They referenced back to the cause of low self-control describing the parenting that they claim is to blame and therefore theorized that bad parenting leads to low self-control that leads to crime, making low self-control the root of all crime. Gilbert Geis, a criminologist, has dissected the theory and found many deficiencies regarding its applicability to all crime.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In societies where there are strong social controls, it limits the ability of the criminal to engage in criminal behavior. Without these social controls, the criminal elements will be successful and influence members of the society. Another aspect of the personal crime theory is that people who live in communities that lack the necessary social controls experience strain when they cannot reach the same success as other members of society. The strain that is met by the citizen turns to anger or frustration is alleviated by criminal behavior that gets the person closer to his or her…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The social control theory does not ask the question “what makes people to commit a crime?” It bases its belief on the assumption that people are thought from a very young age between right and wrong. Social interaction is the key for the theory; humans are thought since birth the rules of society. Parents at home, and teachers in schools, are both the primary tutors of the upbringing of social behavior. According to Williams & McShane (2010), “Theories of social control all rely on social factors to explain how people are restrained from acting in ways harmful to others.” The strengths behind this theory is that social behavior is an immense factor when dealing with criminal behavior. If parents did not teach their children that taking candy from a store without paying was bad, then can we really blame that child for taking the candy? But on the other hand we do have those parents that carved good morals, and taught their kids right from wrong, but the children still committed criminal acts. This theory does have a lot of weight on criminal behavior because without proper socialization individuals are more prone to be confused about what is right and…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ip3 Crime Causation

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to (Griswold, Roberts, & Wiatrowski, 1981; Taylor, 2001) the social control theory recognizes that people are irresponsible and careless and that institutional socialization and social learning can imbue self control over instinct (Criminology: Social Control Theory [long] – Zoklet.net).…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While many theories have been established through the years, the Control Theory established and researched by Michael Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi in 1990 has inspired a large amount of research and proposed the most likely reason that people commit crimes. In addition to their initial theory, Harold Grasmick also presented another facet, the Self- Control Theory, claiming that people commit crimes simply because they lack the capacity to use self- control. These theories are both considered psychological theories, involving the way the human mind works in relevance to crime and the choice to commit crime. It is apparent in several past criminal cases that lack of self- control has been the leading factor in the criminal act. (Hay & Forrest, 2009)…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social control theory believes that the community where a person lives, the family, and society either encourages or discourage people to commit illegal actions. According to Mallory, (2007) says, “Fear of punishment, shame or embarrassment and psychological restraints such as conscience are a few reasons why many people choose not to engage in criminal activities.” Healthy relationships with family, with the same beliefs and desires about society committing a criminal, act is the closest connections to organized crime as the members can…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social control theory and social learning theory are two theories that suggest why deviant behavior is chosen to be acted upon by some individuals and not others. Both take a different stance on the issue. Social control theory suggests people’s behavior is based on their bonds to society, if they have strong bonds to society they conform and if not they have a tendency to act out or become involved in criminal or deviant behavior. Social learning theory suggest that through vicarious learning people learn from observing others and based on what the observe make the choice of whether to copy those actions to obtain desired results or chose not to if the results they see are undesirable. The explanations of both theories are presented and a conclusion of why social learning theory is more acceptable on explaining the reasons people engage in delinquent behavior is presented.…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Controls

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This essay will thoroughly examine and evaluate the claim that it is social controls that prevent us from committing crimes by looking at different social control theories. Firstly we must determine what a social control theory consists of, according to Hopkins (2009) ‘social control theory is fundamentally derived from a conception of human nature that proposes that there are no natural limits on elementary human needs and desires. People will always want and seek further economic reward and it is thus not necessary to look for special motives for engaging in criminal activity. Human beings are born free to break the law and will only refrain from doing so under particular circumstances. It is these fundamental assumptions that form the basis of social control theories’ (Hopkins 2009, p.246). Therefore controls set in society are the reason humans do not commit crime, if these controls were to be removed humans would naturally due to their nature commit crime. This also shows that social control theories try and solve the question of ‘why do people not commit crime?’ rather than ‘what causes people to commit crime?’ The reason behind solving the first question rather than the second is because social control theorists believe committing crime is the default position of every human therefore the second question has already been solved.…

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Collecting information is essential to the research you are conducting. Gathering the data and analyzing it will help simplify and organize the information. You can organize the documents, and notes collected by topic. A spreadsheet can be used to arrange data to compare the results.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organized Crime Paper

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The social control theory states that an individual 's care about the community that they live in usually want commit any illegal activities in that community. This theory also believe before a person a crime they usually will about the consequence that they will face if they committed this crime. The social control theory also states that if the community continues to show that they care about the people who live in the community by offer different programs and displays morals and respect it would be hard for criminal activities to exist (University of Phoenix, 2010).…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ”Therefore, there is no straight choice about whether Britain’s political future is to be ’European’ or otherwise. This reflects not just the domestic complexity and combustibility of the debate about European integration, but also a profound sense of ambiguity about what the European Union is now and what it might yet become” (Colin Hay 2002). This quote describes Britain’s position and views towards the European Union very well in order to start my discussion about their political role towards European integration. In this essay I will start by looking into how history has its influence on the given subject and what needs to be done to convince the public that the EU is a necessary institution to be a part of. Furthermore I would like to look at the issue of the EMU which I see as a key part of the European integration.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CONFIDENTIAL and not for reproduction without prior written consent. © of the Sporting Exchange Limited.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays