Beauty is a symbol of morality as a dove is a symbol of peace. Since 500 BC, people debated the dependability of morality on aesthetic judgement . One of the few historically known people who accentuated this issue was an ancient Greek philosopher, Socrates[] (in text of Gorgias). Later this debate was provoked in the House of Commons by Edmund Burke. However, Immanuel Kant demonstrated an impeccable coherence between morality and aesthetic judgement (beautiful and sublime). In this reflection paper the argument will endorse how morality relies partially on beauty and partly on sublimity. Moreover, this paper will discuss how Burke's speech in impeachment and trial relatively propagates the thought of aesthetic juxtaposed …show more content…
Judgements that exclude the entity of self inclination are entitled as "pure judgements" (Kant 91). The relationship of beauty with pure judgment provides us the required individuality. Beautiful, according to Kant's definition is an identification which is determined on the basis of universality and disinterest . Precisely, an object cannot be labeled as beautiful until it holds the similar effect on every individual. Inclusively, sublimity is a type of pure judgment. Kant asserts that 'in moral properties, true virtue is alone sublime;' as soon as this feeling [of universal goodwill ] has climbed to its proper universality, it is sublime' (Kant). In other words, sublime is structured upon universally valid judgements. On this note, beauty and sublimity are pure and so is morality. Beautiful and sublime in coherence with morality rely on pure judgement, because they are independent of agreeability. Impure judgements are the lowest category of assessment for Kant, nevertheless, he refers that pure judgement is irreducible to schematics of impure judgements ( judgements which include self interest and external …show more content…
Derivation of the points projected by Kant, results in the analogy that beauty does not infuse morality, rather morality infuses beauty. Regardless of major differences ( between sublime and beautiful), the judgement of the sublime shares few traits with the judgement of beauty, that is based on feelings. One of the subordinated traits is their connection with the morality. To assess the co-relation of sublime with moral, Kant discusses it under the heading of 'moral culture'. Arguing ,for example that the feeling of sublimity itself, contains elements of pain and pleasure, but "[t]he liking for the sublime contains not so much a positive pleasure as rather admiration and respect, and should be called a negative pleasure" (Kant). Likewise, moral feeling includes an entity of displeasure (pain) and an entity of pleasure (respect).In the case of the dynamically sublime, when it incurs that practical wisdom is dominant we become aware of our supersensible nature, hence, it shows that reason is also the source of moral feeling. Nevertheless, the sublimity belongs to human freedom