Preview

exclusion clause 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
exclusion clause 1
These are elements that Thomas would need to prove in order for him to success claiming from Ultra Clean. Firstly, he would first have to find whether there’s a contract between Ultra Clean and him. Secondly, he has to identify the breach and which exclusion clause covers the breach. Thirdly, he has to find that whether Ultra clean interpreted the exclusion clause strictly and whether it is clear enough to cover the breach.
Exclusion clause would prevent Thomas from claiming the breach as the purpose of it is to deny liability. The effect of exclusion clause is shown in the case of Mas Airline v Malini, when there’s a valid exclusion clause, the claimant will be bound by the exclusion clause and cannot claim from the breach. Three types of exclusion clause are identified in the case of Taveechai Marine which are limiting liability, particular breach and generally excluding liability. The first clause in the question is considered as generally excluding liability as it did not specify which type damage. Ultra clean guarantee that they will return the laundry within 3 days but for two weeks none of Thomas’ laundry is returned. Also, they promised to collects dirty laundry from its customers twice weekly but it turned out to be five days a week. These two breaches are covered by second clause which is particular breach. The third and forth clauses are also considered as particular breach. There is no limiting liability in the terms.
The first mechanism to identify the validity of exclusion clause is doctrine of incorporation. First rule is whether the term was contemporaneous with the contract determined the validity of exclusion clause. In the case of Olley v Marlborough, the clause is seen after the contract, therefore the exclusion clause is not valid. This is because some of the term may not agree by the signatory before entering into the contract as usually all the term must be shown for both parties, then only they can come into mutual agreement. If the term is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Gbs205 Final

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    b. Under UCC law, Alex SGC can sue LSB under Implied Warranty of Merchantability. Since the order placed by Alex SGC was for sticks of colored pearl and silver but arrived white and blue, they did not conform to the contract description of the good. Title had transferred from LSB to Alex SGC when identification and delivery were completed. Alex SGC didn’t reject any portion of the shipment at delivery, therefore implied warranty is their only recourse. LSB’s defense against Alex SGC’s suit would be that the buyer did not fulfill both of the buyer’s obligations. While the goods were paid according…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharon would also be able to bring a claim of misrepresentation of the quality g of the goods. Under a of quality claim the seller misrepresented the quality of the good and the consumer relied on this misrepresentation to their determent, Here Dean misrepresented the quality of the boat to Sharon. He represented to her that the boat was ready to use and implied to her the boat was inspected by a mechanic by showing her her the mechanics 30 point checklist. Sandra relied on this misrepresentation to her detrment because she wanted a boat that was in good consition.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Goody’s entered into a contract with Banco to purchase wind suits. On or about July 13, 1994, Goody’s agreed to change the delivery date of the first shipment to September 30, 1994 and assured Banco that the “letters of credit” would be amended appropriately. Around August 23, 1994, prior to the contract delivery date, Goody’s informed Banco that they were terminating the contract. Plaintiff comes to the courts for relieve in the matter to a breach of contract.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1914, Weeks v. United States was decided by the Supreme Court. In Weeks, the Court made a landmark decision relating to illegal search and seizure by law enforcement called the Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule provided that evidence “illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a suspect’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a criminal prosecution.” (Exclusionary Rule, 2010, p. 287). However, it was not until the 1961 case of Mapp v. Ohio that the Court made the Exclusionary Rule binding on the states…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule is intended to reject prove acquired disregarding a criminal litigant's Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment ensures against irrational quests and seizures by law requirement work force. On the off chance that the hunt of a criminal suspect is preposterous, the proof acquired in the pursuit will be rejected from trial.The exclusionary administer is a court-made run the show. This implies it was made not in statutes go by authoritative bodies but instead by the U.S. Incomparable Court. The exclusionary control applies in government courts by goodness of the Fourth Amendment. The Court has decided that it applies in state courts in spite of the fact that the due procedure condition of the Fourteenth Amendment.(The Bill of Rights—the…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I find that the evidence would still be valid based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. The good faith exception states “that If officers had a reasonable, good-faith belief that they were acting per legal authority, such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective, the illegally seized evidence is admissible” (Busby, 2009). The good faith exception was established by a 6-3 U.S Supreme court decision in the United States v. Leon 468 U.S. 897 (1984). The majority opinion, as written by Bryon R. White, was that the exclusionary rule was established to deter law enforcements violations of the 4th amendment warranting against illegal search and seizure. Therefore “reliable physical evidence seized by officers reasonably relying on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate” did not violate the exclusionary rule and the evidence was to be admitted (Kaye, 2011). The good faith exception was reviewed and expanded in Arizona v. Evans 514 U.S. 1 (1995), a case that I feel directly correlates to my decision reference the admissibility of the evidence in the example given. In Arizona v. Evans an officer conducts a legal traffic stop. Upon running the driver’s license the officer discovers an outstanding warrant for arrest. Pursuant to the arrest a search was conduct and marijuana discovered. When charging Evan’s when possession the officers discovered that the warrant had been quashed. In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that this was not a violation of Evan’s 4th Amendment rights since the evidence, though obtained based on an illegal warrant, was legal based on the good faith…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not one person can answer a question about the "exclusionary rule" until they know what is stated in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule go hand in hand. The Fourth Amendment was put into the constitution to limit on the actions of overzealous officers (Peak, 2006). Then, one must understand what is meant by "probable cause." Armed with this information, we can discuss the definition of the exclusionary rule and some of its history. Also, we will list some of the advantages and disadvantages of the exclusionary rule and ask the question should it be abandoned.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Commerce Clause Case Study

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The inception of the Commerce Clause has led over the years the Supreme Court to explore the limitations of the power of the federal government. The interpretation of the Commerce Clause in cases like the United States v. Lopez, United States v. Morrison et. al. and Gonzales v. Raich provide examples of the limits of the federal government. This case discussion first touches on the Supreme Court’s position regarding the Commerce Clause before the Lopez and Morrison cases. Afterwards, the Lopez and Morrison cases undergo an examination in an attempt to explain soon afterwards the reasoning the decision behind the Gonzales v. Raich case.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    They seem to believe the exclusionary rule is no longer necessary due to the high degree of police professionalism. AELE believe police violations are unintentional and because of their high degree of professionalism they act in "Good Faith". Therefore petty mistakes allow evidence to be excluded and free criminals.…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “[t]he right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const. amend. IV). When the Fourth Amendment rights of citizens are violated, the criminal justice system enforces the exclusionary rule, which seeks to discourage law enforcement officers from using improper or illegal investigative procedures. In Mapp v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the exclusionary rule was…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When law enforcement or an government agency take it upon themselves to enter someone home or search a vehicle without a valid search warrant they are violating that persons Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure. Evidence that could be admissible in a case may be excluded from trial if it is gather as a resulted from an illegal search or some other constitutional violation. The exclusionary rule prevents the use of most evidence gathered illegally. The rule can also be triggered by law enforcement violations of a person’s Fifth or Sixth Amendments right as well. I feel that is the case as it contains to John Smith and the search of his…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the introduction of the exclusionary rule, courts have found that it can not be enforced across the board, and have carved out a number of exceptions. These are:…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evidence obtained by a police officer in reasonable reliance on a search warrant that is subsequently found invalid may be admissible. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984). It is necessary that a reasonably well-trained officer would have believed that the warrant was valid. This has come to be known as the “good faith” or Leon exception to the exclusionary rule. Many states, however, have rejected this exception.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a landmark supreme court case, called the united states versus weeks, the supreme courts created a rule to our criminal procedure called the exclusionary rule. What the exclusionary rule means is that if the police obtain evidence against you in violation of your constitutional rights, they cannot use that evidence against you to prove your guilt or innocence at a trial. An example of this would be police searching your home without a search warrant. If they found illegal item in your home during that search, they could not be used against you at trial. Now the important thing to remember about the exclusionary rule, however, is that it does not mean you are automatically free to go. It only means that that particular piece of evidence is…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page

    The exclusionary rule requires that evidence illegally seized must be excluded from criminal trials. Leon was the target of police surveillance based on an anonymous informant's tip. The police applied to a judge for a search warrant of Leon's home based on the evidence from their surveillance. A judge issued the warrant and the police recovered large quantities of illegal drugs. Leon was indicted for violating federal drug laws. A judge concluded that the affidavit for the search warrant was insufficient; it did not establish the probable cause necessary to issue the warrant. Thus, the evidence obtained under the warrant could not be introduced at Leon's trial.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics