Preview

Existence of God Argumentative Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2105 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Existence of God Argumentative Paper
Jessica Black-212160
Philosophy
8-17-2012

McCloskey

There are many different types of arguments for the existence of God. With each argument there is a conception presented of God. For each argument there are different approaches. I will be focusing on the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments. Teleological
Arguments are known to be arguments from divine, arguing from order in the universe to the existence of God (1).With the ordering of the universe, created by an intelligent being, they hold that it is ordered towards a purpose or an end. The Cosmological Argument “is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it. It is a first caused argument where the existence of the universe, the argument claims, stands in need of explanation, and the only adequate explanation of its existence is that it was created by
God” (1). Behind this argument, it holds that though the universe still needs explanation for its existence, the existence of God Himself does not. In the article McCloskey is critical of these arguments for God’s existence supporting his stance by offering the problem of evil as reasoning to not believe. He believes the belief in the existence of God is not a source of strength and security (2). However, if we are to use the Cumulative Case approach we can have successive truths. This case cumulates the Cosmological, Teleological, as well as, the Moral Arguments together. It gives us the conclusion of a personal, moral, intelligent creator of the universe as the best explanation for the universe we experience (3).

McCloskey maintains that the Teleological Argument is not satisfactory and that it can be rejected simply by rejecting its premise. The premise holds that there is in fact evidence of purpose and design. McCloskey says though, that there were many things that were considered evidence or



Bibliography: 11- Craig, William Lane. "The Absurdity of Life without God." In Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, by William Lane Craig, 71-90. Wheaton: Crossway Books, 2008. 1-Evans, C. Stephen, and R. Zachary Manis. Philosophy of Religion: Thinking About Faith. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2009. 8- Kunkle,Brett. “The Logical Problem of Evil.” Truth Never Gets Old. April 21, 2009 2- McCloskey, H. J. "On Being an Atheist." Question (1968): 63-69. 5- Biologos. “What is the “fine-tuning” of the universe, and how does it serve as a “pointer to God?” 9- http://kevinfannystevenson.blogspot.com/2012/07/on-being-theist-response-to-h-j.html 10- http://www.existence-of-god.com/first-cause-argument.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is no adequate evidence that God exists, nor is there adequate evidence that God does not exist.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these explain the existence of God through the study of Cosmology and the many findings by astrologists like Edwin Hubble, and simply what exists around society.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’ Assess whether the existence of the universe requires God as a first cause?…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cosmological Argument is a posteriori argument (knowledge gained after experience) which attempts to prove that there is a rational basis for the belief in God. This argument is synthetic as it uses senses and is distinctive as it uses evidence of the universe to prove that God exists. The argument attempts to prove that God exists by evaluating the scale and nature of the cosmos. In order for this argument to succeed it has to be inductive and produce overwhelming evidence to show Gods existence. Arguments, like this one, can be interpreted in various ways so there will be different conclusions about God, in other words religious ambiguity. Furthermore most supporters of the Cosmological Argument argue that the universe could only have come into existence if it were caused by an uncaused cause. Thomas Aquinas, a Dominican friar, adapted the argument. He stated that everything must have a cause, nothing is its own cause, and a chain of causes cannot be infinite and that there must be a first cause. This first cause must be an infinite, necessary being.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the cosmological argument is a strong argument for the theory that the universe it is a weak argument for the existence of the classical theological God.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russell and Copleston

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before Copleston gets going with the Cosmological Argument, he uses two other arguments to suggest the existence of God in his introduction. These are:…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography lists 5 sources. SA148God.rtf I. Introduction and Overview Does God exist? Perhaps there is no more important question, and no question that has been more illusively answered. It is hard to prove that something for which only scant evidence exists, and no scientific proof appears, actually is real. When people try to prove the existence of…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When discussing God’s existence, people appeal to both creation and logic. In this article, we aim to consider the arguments from creation. The first we will look at is the cosmological argument. Essentially, this argument suggests that because the universe has a beginning, there must be something that caused it. But, how do we know that the universe has a beginning? Consider this: if everything in the universe decays and eventually dies, it is impossible for the universe to be eternal, for it would have already died by now. However, if a divine Creator fashioned the universe at some point in time, it would explain our current and ongoing existence.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Existence of God Arguments

    • 7756 Words
    • 32 Pages

    What real evidence can be supplied for God's existence? St. Thomas, in his Summa Theologica, sets forth five separate proofs for the existence of God, Unlike St. Anselm's proof, which deals with pure concepts, St. Thomas' proofs rely on the world of our experience-what we can see around us. In these proofs we can easily see the influence of Aristotle and his doctrine of the Four Causes.…

    • 7756 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why should there be a universe there to explain? Unlike the language of science, religious language “grapples with the task of addressing what cannot be fully captured by even the most complete scientific account of the phenomenal world” (8). Instead of finding significance in terms of physical quantities and mechanical interactions, religious language reflects on the universes power, beauty, rhythm, and harmony. Therefore, religious discourse pushes the limits of the observable, towards uncovering something beyond the phenomenal world, in hopes of giving meaning to the universe and to our human lives. Cottingham believes religion “adds a framework within which that nature is revealed as more than just a set of characteristics… encourages us with the hope that the pursuit of virtue… contributes to the establishment of moral order that the cosmos was created to realize” (72). In other words, the religious perspective offers a possibility for human purposeness by providing a powerful focus on moral goodness. Religious discourse is important because since science accounts for how the universe and humans were made. We feel that we are thrown into this world where nothing ultimately matters, but religion offers hope, value and significance towards…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It comes in two structures, one modular doing with plausibility and the other transient. The modular cosmological contention, the contention from possibility, proposes that on the grounds that the universe won't not have existed, we require some clarification of why it does. Where ever there are two potential outcomes, it proposes, something must figure out which of those conceivable outcomes is figured it out. As the universe is unforeseen, then, there must be some explanation behind its presence; it must have a cause. Truth be told, the main sort of being whose presence requires no clarification is a vital being, a being that couldn't have neglected to exist. A definitive reason for everything should in this way be an essential being, for example,…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The cosmological argument states, “It’s the attempts to infer the existence of God from the existence of the cosmos or universe” (Evans & Manis, 67). The cosmological argument many times is known as the first-cause argument; God is the creator of all existence. McCloskey attacks the first-cause argument. He says, “That the first cause must be explained as being a necessarily existing being, one who cannot not exists” (McCloskey, 63). Although, this argument can’t stand alone, when looking around at the things of this world, it has to be noted the existence of many things. When looking, collectively things that are in existence don’t have to necessarily exist according to the law of nature. The question is why do these things exist? These types of things are under the non-temporal contingency, which is another version of the cosmological argument. This argument claims that, “The explanation of a contingent being’s existence will be incomplete unless it culminates in the causal activity of a necessary being, a being that cannot fail to exist, and a being that is the cause of the existence of all contingent beings” (Evans & Manis, 69). There is no explanation needed for a necessary being. On the contrary, McCloskey don’t believe that this is enough to say the God exist. He states, “The mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in the existence…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays