Preview

Explain Feuerbach s teaching on Religion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
826 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Feuerbach s teaching on Religion
Explain Feuerbach’s teaching on Religion

Feuerbach began his philosophical career as a Hegelian but quickly came to see the shortcomings of this philosophy. He argued that Hegel’s system was a mere ‘ghost of theology’ and swiftly moved on to write his own works. His most famous being ‘The Essence of Christianity’ and ‘The Essence of Religion’. Feuerbach was a modernist and in his major works he tends to reduce religion to its existential, sociological and anthropological origins. Feuerbach states that Religion illustrates an interesting and important fact about being human and that is the overwhelming sense humans have of their finitude and dependency. Without science such feelings couldn’t be given adequate explanation; early human attempts to explain these feelings is what caused the rise to religion. From this perspective Feuerbach claims that religion is the most important insight into human consciousness and human needs. The sense of religious feeling of dependence is ‘self –feeling feeling’. Feuerbach claims that the development of religion portrays two things: That gradually humans have overcome their dependency on nature by representing it in symbolic terms such as Gods or personified powers of creation. Secondly that the symbols have been objectified further into metaphysical ideas. This is clearly seen in the belief of the one infinite, transcendent God of monotheism. However, Feuerbach goes on to say that the history of religion also reveals that those who developed its doctrines were aware that in fact belief and dependency on God can only be plausible if God is radically and ‘wholly different’ from Nature. He outlines that Luther’s insistence on the finitude of man illustrated how unnecessary God is ontologically for human existence. He is unnecessary for existence but a symbol of what humans need and desire in their life. The attributes of God therefore become objective as it is the tendency of the human mind to project particularly powerful

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The use of the conception of how religion correlates with the human mind is very well talked about outside of the article. Besides the author’s article, the discussion over how religion impacts the human mind is looked more in depth in Fraser Watts’s abstraction of “Self-Conscious Emotions, Religion and Theology.” For instance, Watts makes a claim that, “Self-conscious emotions such as guilt and shame also provide a vantage point for approaching soteriology” (p 1). Indulging in negative emotions can also follow up with a closer understanding about religion…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the beginning of mankind, man has sought some form of a higher entity and a basis for humanity. Since the beginning, it has always been important to find a greater purpose for human life--to discover life’s meaning. Naturally, due to cultural differences, incongruities arose in man’s interpretation of how best to live and how best to be faithful, and eventually man focused more on those differences rather than the similar theme that was emphasized in each of the Holy Books: to love our neighbors and to love God, or whatever higher entity we chose to worship (Interview). As time progressed, these differences in opinion began to become forms of identification, and man began to use faith and religion to distinguish themselves from one another.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion is more than individual faith; it is an impactful orientation to a purpose far greater than one person. Long stated how religion is “an orientation in the ultimate sense, that is, how one comes to terms with the ultimate significance of one’s place in the world” (p. 7). It is often within the realm of religion that people find power in their own…

    • 3597 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud and Tillich

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rel134Elements Paper

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to the linguistic roots of the term religion re-, means “again” and lig-, means “join” or “connect”. The word religion proposes the joining of the human world to the sacred world (Molloy, 2010). In my personal point of view religion is very important because it allows us to believe that there is a God who loves us and wants us to be happy. There are different types of religions and none of them are wrong if they lead people to a life of love, joy, compassion, and service. The question of why religions exist is evidently because it serves as human needs (Molloy, 2010). One of the first needs of humans is having a meaning when it comes to dealing with our mortality. It is very common that as individuals we try to look for a purpose of why different situations happen in life especially when we have no control over them. The religion we belong to can give us comfort to some level in our life. There are some elements known to involve a religion regardless of which one it is which will be discussed in this paper. Also this paper will mention the relationships with the divine, sacred time, sacred space or the natural world, and the relationship with each other.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Concordia Theological Quarterly written by Burnell F, Eckardt, theologians, Martin Luther and Jürgen Moltmann, state their viewpoints and opinions of theology of the cross and what role they play in Christian lives. In this essay, a summarization of Luther’s understanding of the theology of the cross is followed by Moltmann’s perspective, then comparing and contrasting their notions and giving an opinion on which idea is better.…

    • 2088 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the discussion concerning the nature of religion in philosophy, the most prominent names include John Hick, Michael Goulder, John Herman Randall, Karen Armstrong, and Paul Tillich. Two primary vantage points exist in this discussion: the theistic view, in which the individual believes in an ultimate, transcendent being called “God,” and the non-theistic view, in which the individual sees “God” as a hypothesis rather than another Holy Being. To draw focus toward three particular names-- John Herman Randall, Karen Armstrong, and Paul Tillich-- is to draw specific attention to a compelling perspective regarding religion. To begin, John Herman Randall champions a point about religious symbols: “All ideas of God… are religious symbols… Such…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Every major school of thought has its authors, its influencers, and its divine chosen, if you will. These men and women influence everything from macro economics and political science to the physical sciences of the known universe. Without the contribution of these grand individuals, academics would be destined to their origins, they would cease to develop and many would not even exist. So it is on the existence of these great minds in which we invest our confidence for an ever-growing world. There is one topic in particular, though, whose existence and development is greatly attributed to these individuals: religion.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wolterstorff Summary

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "For millennia, philosophers and others have explained religious belief. Barrett 's discussion challenges every explanation I know of, doing so on the basis of fascinating and innovative empirical studies, and acute philosophical analysis. His theory is innovative, compelling, and provocative at many points, not least in its conclusion that theism, not atheism, is our natural condition. It 's the sort of book that shakes up the field; all philosophers and psychologists of religion will have to take account of it."…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tillich writes about religion as “untouchable, awe-inspiring, an ultimate meaning” because in Tillich’s case religion has depth. Therefore, religion is commonly misunderstood according to Tillich as something that “man received something which does not come from him, but which is given to him and may…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early 1500’s, Martian Luther (1483-1546) became a pivotal figure in the Protestant Reformation. Although a brilliant scholar and Augustinian monk, Luther struggled to find peace with God viewing Him “as a wrathful judge who expected sinners to earn their own righteousness” (Elwell, 1984, p. 665). After realizing the truth of Ephesians 2:8, Luther would come to change his view of God, rediscovering the grace of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Luther’s views not only contributed to the Protestant Reformation that changed Christianity forever, but also contributed to the advancement of science and psychology, and placed him at odds with the Church on issues such as marriage and the accepted understanding of free will.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many theorists have taken interest in religion for their fascination of its power to influence and shape human personality, behavior and action. Thomas Hobbes is one philosopher who attributed people’s clinging to religion as a logical alternative to find an acceptable explanation for things that are beyond their comprehension such as creation, the nature of things and ethics among others. Earlier philosophers adhered that the conception of religion is an inherent predilection of rational beings such that if lions and oxen have hands and feet, they too would conceive of a god that would look like a lion or an ox.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mircea Eliade on Religion

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Several people find Mircea Eliade’s view on religion similar to Emile Durkheim’s, but in truth, it is similar to Tylor and Frazer’s. One of Eliade’s major works was The Sacred and the Profane. In his writings he explains that his understanding of religion are two concepts: the sacred and the profane. The profane consists of things that are ordinary, random, and unimportant, while the sacred is the opposite. The sacred “is the sphere of supernatural, of things extraordinary, memorable, and momentous” (Pals 199). When Durkheim mentioned the sacred and the profane, he was concerned about society and its needs. In Eliade’s view, the concern of religion is with the supernatural. To Eliade, the profane doesn’t hold as much meaning as the sacred. He describes profane as vanishing and fragile, while the sacred as eternal and full of substance. He does not try to explain away religion and reject all reductionist efforts. Eliade only focuses on “timeless forms.” He says they reoccur in religions all over the world, but he ignores their specific context and dismisses them as irrelevant. He also ties religion to archaic people whom he defines as, “those who have lived in the world of nature,” (Pals 198) or those who have hunted, fished, and farmed routinely. Archaic people want to live life in the model of the divine because they have a deep longing for paradise, and to be close to God. Also, Eliade is an admirer of how myths tell the stories of not only gods but also on the struggles of life. He says that humanity is forming a new belief system in which the belief is of whether or not there really is a God. Eliade states that because of this theory, we must learn to live without the sacred. Eliade certainly has an interesting approach on religion.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud's View of Religion

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sigmund Freud grew up in a Catholic town in Moravia, where he was one of a very small number of Jew’s. He claimed to have grown up without any belief in God, and never to have felt the need for it. Freud worked from the presupposition that the origin of religion is psychological, he assumed from the start that religious belief; religious experience and religious impulses come from within the mind and not from any external supernatural being.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A religion can be seen as a unified system of beliefs and practices which are relative to sacred things and beliefs (Giddens 1972, p.224). It can shape ones thoughts and feelings and gives people a sense of hope and something to believe in. All three main sociologist writers Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religion put forward by Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marx's and Durkheim's thought will be compared and contrasted in order to determine the differences and similarities between their ideas. Finally, it will be explained which one of the theorists views and ideas are the most relevant to contemporary times and why.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays