The Congress of Vienna was successful in achieving the aims of the peacemakers, to an extent. They accomplished maintaining the peace and balance of power in Europe for a while and the Congress was able to resolve many of their territorial disputes without difficulty. The Great Powers worked on maintaining the peace in Europe, doing whatever they needed to keep it. For a century they were successful, however, the Congress eventually began to fall apart as the major powers’ self-interest limited their objectives. It was the conflicts that arose, along with unequal representation that they, like many in the past, were successful in the short-term effects, however, fell short when it came to the long term effects.
There was unequal representation in the Congress. Though …show more content…
The first conflict that came up, was that the French wanted the occupation force withdrawn, because the French government felt that they had less credibility due to the foreign troops on their land. It was then that France was formally admitted into the congress system. Following that was the civil unrest in Spain and Sicily, revolt in Naples, Spain and Greece. The Troppau Protocol was brought up, suggesting that there be “collective resistance to forces of nationalism and liberalism”, proposing that the great powers be given the ability of bringing intervention in domestic affairs. The British didn’t support this, and they withdrew. It was because of the protocol that French troops were sent to Spain to subdue the revolts. However, this resulted in many liberals imprisoned and killed, and France soon withdrew from the congress as well. After this, Austria, Prussia, and Russia worked to keep the peace of