Preview

Explain the Concept of Irreducible Complexity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
626 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain the Concept of Irreducible Complexity
a) Explain the concept of ‘Irreducible Complexity’. [25marks] The concept of Irreducible Complexity comes from the argument about Intelligent Design. The argument refers to certain features that are present within the universe and within living organisms and where they possibly came from. Those who argue irreducible complexity say that these features are too complex to not have come from design, whereas those who argue against irreducible complexity say that it is possible for these complex features to have been brought about by natural selection. For something to be irreducibly complex, each part of the structure has to be crucial in allowing the entire structure to work. If one part is removed, the structure can no longer function. Scientists themselves have said that there is not an explanation of evolution for everything, which means that it is possible that evolution can explain some of the complex features within the universe, but the universe itself could be argued to have intelligent design. Darwin, the founder of the theory of natural selection, attempted to prove his theory by saying that it was impossible to find something in nature that had not evolved, and challenged anyone to find it, if there was such a thing. Darwin’s challenge was then answered by Michael Behe, a biochemist who advocates Intelligent Design. Behe had explained his findings in his book ‘Darwin’s Black Box'. Behe claims that opening the ‘black box’ of cells, there are numerous examples of complex molecular machines that absolutely break down the theory of natural selection as a way of explaining all living systems. An example that Behe used was the cilium. These are tiny hair-like structures based on the outside of cells that help move fluid. Behe argued that within the structure, there are many little components within that allow the cilium to function. Behe had said that if the cilium did not have a motor protein, the microtubules in the cilium would not slide and it would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Michael J. Behe wrote this book to show that Darwinism is not consistent with what we now know about biochemistry. The book is a daring attempt to re-establish the argument for design in living things. Chapter three is all about how molecule machines operate a cell.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He uses this as a springboard to his central argument that runs through Darwin’s Black Box, that is Irreducible Complexity. Behe uses the analogy of the mouse trap, a simple tool consisting of 5 simple parts to form an effective mouse killing device. We may look at a mousetrap and see it’s simplicity in design, and certainly many people have spent a lot of time “trying to build a better mousetrap” but it is always either based on that design, or going in a completely new direction, sometimes simpler, sometimes more complex, to achieve the same outcome of catching a mouse. However, you cannot simply remove one of the parts and still have an effective mousetrap, in fact, it would cease to be an mouse trap, but either a block of wood, or a jumble of metal wires. All of which may or may not be useful for another task, but never again reform the job of a mouse trap, until recombined in its proper form. There is no way for any of the parts to be removed, and there is no way for any of the parts, alone from the whole, to be formed into a working…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He spoke specifically about butterflies and stick bugs, asking how their specific and detailed traits could have been perfected over time when Darwin claims that much of natural selection is random. He also asks how higher life forms could have developed limbs if they were supposedly evolved from creatures without limbs. Some characteristics are so specific and finely tuned, it seems implausible to Mivert that they could have developed over time randomly and indefinitely. He asks the same thing about flatfishes, wondering how having eyes on the sides of their heads was beneficial to their survival, and what purpose is served by them moving to the side of the…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sci 230 Week 1

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evolution by natural selection: This theory came about as a result of Charles Darwin trying to find an explanation for “why there are so many different living beings on earth?” (Pruitt, N. L., & Underwood, L. S. (2006). His theory contains two parts, the first part states that species change over generations. The second part states that what causes this change is natural selection.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After a negative vote from the board to adopt the book, Buckingham and his committee drafted a statement that would be required for all biology teachers to read before they taught any coursework that involved evolution. This statement spoke of the gaps and problems that existed in Darwin’s theory, it also let the students know that copies of the book “Of Pandas and People” would be available if they were interested in understanding intelligent design.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this lab simulation, we studied the different factors that go into natural selection. These factors were things such as: fertility, the complexity of genes, the use of natural selection versus not using it, and the rate of mutation. All of these things would then affect the amount of generations it would take to get the “target phrase.” This target phrase was used as a tool to understand the complexity of some genes compared to the simplicity of others. The first chapter in Dawkins’ book, “The Blind Watchmaker,” correlates the most when it comes to what we studied in the lab. In the first chapter, he describes that complex things such as animals must have been made by design. However, he also explains that this designer is…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teleological Argument

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Science works within the frameworks of pre-existing assumptions and for Darwin’s theory to work it is on the condition that there is teleology in nature. Organisms survive because they are teleological as opposed to stating they are teleological because they survived. There is no escaping the fact that the universe is an intelligent design which must have been created by an intelligent designer (McGrath, 2010). This assumption explains it existence and what it is while the cosmic design describes why it is this…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    87-89) . Behe’s theory suggests that design is a part of evolution as there are complex molecular structures that exist before evolution can occur and these can’t be there by chance. An example could be that in each stage of evolution there would be times when certain organs such as the eye for example (although Behe doesn’t use this example) would be incomplete and therefore useless unless these complex biochemical structures were in place from the beginning. The claim being that evolution still needs to ‘use’ what biochemical material already exist and that this in and of itself is far too complex to have been created by chance (Chappell, 2011, pp. 87-89) However using the example of the eye again one could argue that an eye with limited functionality would be better than none at all. Furthermore although this argument attempts to embed itself into Darwin’s theory of evolution it can be explained by Darwin’s theory as with the eye example. From no eye to detecting light with a single eye from there to developing two eyes and so able to detect the light sources direction and so forth (Chappell, 2011, p. 90). Although Behe was referring to complexity on a biochemical level the analogy of the eye provides a strong argument in…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most notably, intelligent design is a theory which has gained much support in modern circles, and attempts to account for flaws in strictly materialistic or teleological views of the universe. Intelligent Design accepts Darwinian evolution as an account referring to the development of life in the universe. The theory also accepts however, that evolution is a strictly materialistic view of the universe and is flawed in its ability to explain life's origins. Intelligent Design looks to teleological evidence to explain the origin of life and the mind behind Darwinian evolution.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Living things adapt to their environment by variations in their genetics, which include mutation and reproduction. The traits and features that many of the species had helped them adapt to their environment and their surroundings. Many of the creatures have experienced changes in their appearance and in their bodies. The organisms have evolved from other organisms of the same species. The organisms were originally complex, but after a short amount of time, they evolved and became more complex. Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution is an effortlessly legitimate method for clarifying the procedure of Evolution. His thoughts have had a colossal effect on the world, and have altered science. Despite the fact that some do not agree with Darwin's theories, they are still deserving of acknowledgment and should be listed as one of the most clever and essential natural discoveries…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1859, Charles Darwin, a scientist from England, formulated the theory of evolution. His theory was composed of two ideas: variation and natural selection. Variation was explained to be certain biological characteristics that a creature possessed in order to survive. Certain creatures who had the positive, favorable traits equipped them better for survival as opposed to the individuals lacking them. Natural selection was the process in which a species that adapted better to the environment because of preferable physical or mental characteristics continued to evolve and what caused the weakest of the species who were lacking in these to perish.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Central to the theory of evolution, is natural selection. Evolutionary theory was developed by Charles Darwin to explain the ways in which animals adapt to their environments (Akert, Aronson, Sommers, and Wilson 43). Natural selection, is the process by which heritable traits that promote survival in particular environments are passed along to…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of evolution dates back in the 16th century during the pre-Socratic Greek philosophers who thought that all natural things both dead and living as being imperfect fixed natural possibilities and had an intended role within the environment. The greatest breakthrough in this understanding came with the theory of natural selection mechanism which was formulated by Charles Darwin. In the 19th century, modern evolution synthesis merged the understanding…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    God and Science

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Traditionally, a belief in God was attractive because it promised to explain the deepest puzzles about origins. Where did the world come from? What is the basis of life? How can the mind arise from the body? Why should anyone be moral? Yet over the millennia, there has been an inexorable trend: the deeper we probe these questions, and the more we learn about the world in which we live, the less reason there is to believe in God. Start with the origin of the world. Today no honest and informed person can maintain that the universe came into being a few thousand years ago and assumed its current form in six days (to say nothing of absurdities like day and night existing before the sun was created). Nor is there a more abstract role for God to play as the ultimate first cause.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays