Explain The Fourth Section Of A Lab Report
a. Title – The first section in a lab report is the title, which should be no longer than 12 words and must accurately reflect the content of the laboratory experiment.
b. Abstract – The second section of a lab report is the Abstract. The Abstract Is an overview of the experiment in about 250 words, while this is the first section that any reader reads. This section should be a summary of the key points of a larger work, including the project’s objective, methodology, and results. Not only is this the first section that a reader reads but also a quick guide to key words and concepts that others may be interested in.
c. Introduction – The next section of a lab report is the Introduction. The Introduction tells the reader why the study was …show more content…
Materials and Methods – The fourth section of a lab report is the Materials and Methods. The Materials and Methods section describes how the work was performed, what was used, and how it was used. This section can also be referred to as the Experimental Section, depending on the article that is read. The Material and Methods section contains several important key details, which include: use of scientific names of what chemical was used, including concentration or concentration ranges; sample techniques; and instrument specifics. This section should be well-written to the point where another individual could repeat the experiment by reading this section. This is not a section that includes any results or discussion of the …show more content…
Discussion – The sixth component to a lab report is the Discussion section. The Discussion section explains to the reader what the results mean. This section should start out specific, while working up to general/broader terms. The hypothesis of the experiment should never be proven or disproven but accepted or rejected. Once the hypothesis has been either accepted or rejected, the meaning of the data should be explained. If any literature sources compare to the experimental results, these sources could be included. Also, if the experimental results do not agree with what is expected, do not state this fact but state how this could relate to the information that has already been founded. In addition to explaining what the results mean, include areas for future experiments that could be relevant to the
b. Abstract – The second section of a lab report is the Abstract. The Abstract Is an overview of the experiment in about 250 words, while this is the first section that any reader reads. This section should be a summary of the key points of a larger work, including the project’s objective, methodology, and results. Not only is this the first section that a reader reads but also a quick guide to key words and concepts that others may be interested in.
c. Introduction – The next section of a lab report is the Introduction. The Introduction tells the reader why the study was …show more content…
Materials and Methods – The fourth section of a lab report is the Materials and Methods. The Materials and Methods section describes how the work was performed, what was used, and how it was used. This section can also be referred to as the Experimental Section, depending on the article that is read. The Material and Methods section contains several important key details, which include: use of scientific names of what chemical was used, including concentration or concentration ranges; sample techniques; and instrument specifics. This section should be well-written to the point where another individual could repeat the experiment by reading this section. This is not a section that includes any results or discussion of the …show more content…
Discussion – The sixth component to a lab report is the Discussion section. The Discussion section explains to the reader what the results mean. This section should start out specific, while working up to general/broader terms. The hypothesis of the experiment should never be proven or disproven but accepted or rejected. Once the hypothesis has been either accepted or rejected, the meaning of the data should be explained. If any literature sources compare to the experimental results, these sources could be included. Also, if the experimental results do not agree with what is expected, do not state this fact but state how this could relate to the information that has already been founded. In addition to explaining what the results mean, include areas for future experiments that could be relevant to the