Preview

Explain the problems of religious language

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain the problems of religious language
A) Explain the problems of religious language. (30)

Some words used within religious language may be viewed as contradictory to our inherent beliefs and logical view as human beings one example of this would be the story of the ‘virgin Mary’ as there is no logical explanation to how she gave birth. Many of the words used in religious language are also metaphysical and have no physical representation therefore it is very hard for us as humans to fully comprehend the ideas they are expressing. An example of this is ‘God is timeless’ as we as humans live in a world where time is very much present so humans’ attempting to understand the phrase causes problems as it is outside of our past experiences. Many of the metaphysical questions within religious language can be problematic as it can not be answered through science or our logic for example ‘why were we created?’ or ‘how did we get here?’. Some scholars argue that our human language is not enough to describe religion thus we are doing God an injustice by attempting to explain it in human language, and that we should not expect that applying worldly language to religion to be adequate for our understanding of it. Similarly some argue that we should not even attempt to understand language hence why synagogues have no pictures of God. It may be argued that by giving God human-esk characteristics we are athromorphising god. Another key factor to religious language causing problems is that it is very difficult to interpret whether something should be taken literally or non-literally one example of this is God turning water into wine some interpreters may view it in its literal form whilst others may state that he turned a simple resource into something much more complex. Even if somebodies interpretation is completely correct there is still no real way of proving this. Something else which also causes confusion within religious language is the same words having different contexts for example ‘spirit’ one context is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    |9. Nontheistic |The belief in one god as the creator and ruler of the universe without rejection of |…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Those who believe that religious language is non-cognitive and so meaningless stem their beliefs from the Logical Positivist. The Logical Positivists were a group of philosophers who were primarily concerned with the truth contained in statements we can make, or in other words, with what can be logically posited, or stated. The group began in Vienna, Austria in the 1920s and gathered around a philosopher called Moritz Schlick. The group was heavily influenced by a philosopher called Ludwig Wittgenstein and in turn, the group influenced many philosophers of religion.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quotes From Hi Peeps

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We all have the same capacity for language, but God divided us up to separate the amount of foolishness we will try to get away with. Even when you speak the same language, people still get wires crossed, half hear a message, or misunderstand what was being said or even seen. People still see, say, and interpret basic information differently.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuading people doesn't have to mean that it has to be done in one unique way. This rhetorical comparison essay between Edwards, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," and Jefferson's, "The Declaration of Independence," shows two different ways of persuading people through great techniques of English writing. The sentence from Edwards sermon and the opening sentence of the Declaration of Independence both include many points such as the tone, diction, syntax, imagery, rhetorical structure, figurative language. The points shown through the opening of Jefferson's Declaration aims through the effects of these points to obtain the attention of the audience. However, the sentence, "The flood's of God's vengeance have been withheld; but your guilt in the meantime is constantly increasing...." From the Edwards sermon, states reasons through these points to procure his motive to his congregation that has gathered about. Both sentences are arranged in such syntax…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Religious language being meaningless is an outlook shared by the logical positivists who have their origins in a group called the Vienna Circle in the 1920-30s. This group of philosophers believed that statements are only meaningful if they are able to be verified by an actually experience or is a tautology; a statements that is true by definition, this is the verification principle. Any statements that don’t meet this criteria are merely opinions which have no value or worth. For example the statement ‘I believe God is evil’ is meaningless unless it can be verified empirically as it isn’t true be definition (tautology). The views of the logical positivists and the Vienna Circle are that metaphysics, religion and ethics should be avoided and the importance of knowledge through science should be advocated. It should be noted however that logical positivist aren’t saying that God doesn’t exist, just that it is meaningless to talk about the issue of God’s existence. This view however has been criticised for being too rigid as it suggests we can’t make statements about certain historical events as they can’t be proven with physical evidence. In addition, the verification principle becomes stuck by its own definition, using the definition of verification the verification principle becomes meaningless as its isn’t a tautology and can’t be proven be actually experience, therefore why should we bother to abide by…

    • 1812 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Vienna Circle was made up of many great philosophers who were against metaphysics due to it leading to illogical thoughts like there being another world to ours. This view transcended onto the philosophical issue of religious language – David Hume for instance – thought that religious language was meaningless due to its irrational diction. A. J. Ayer furthered this point of view within the United Kingdom with a varied response to his ideas. It was through this logical thinking that the verification movement began. Verification claimed that language can only be meaningful if it can be confirmed through sense experience; this movement was based on science, rational thought process and empirical evidence. Simply put, the meaningfulness of a statement is illustrated through the means in which you verify it. An example of sense observation verification is if you were to say “My jumper is red”. Anyone can look at your jumper and see that it is indeed red. Although, if you were to say “my jumper is red and is beautiful” it makes it harder to verify the second half of the statement due to its inability to clarify if it is ‘true’ or ‘false’. To verificationists if it is unable to be verified then it is meaningless. Applying this to religion, if you said “God is good” it is almost impossible to verify its truth or logic. Therefore, religious language is indeed meaningless.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Show that you understand the significance of the language choices made by people with and without authority…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For him this language is not a special language, but rather something that ranges between the Ordinary and the Poetical. It begins by being Ordinary and from there can either go into Theological or Poetical language. “I believe in God” is an Ordinary statement. However, when asked what we mean by “God” we can move in either two directions. The first would response could be either Theological by saying, “I believe in incorporeal (having no physical body or form) entity…”…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Think about slang and how you and your group of friends comes up with words that means different things, such as the word “dog” referring to your good friend or “baby” referring to your girlfriend. None of those words have anything to do with describing the things that were being labeled. Why would dog mean friend, or baby mean girlfriend? That proves the point exactly, what do words mean and why do people use them. This opens up an entire new world of language interpretation. Some things sound different to different cultures, such as the doorbell, it sounds like ding dong to me, but as I found out from Professor Antis, in Japan it sounds like pin pon. So if your not thinking if words really have meanings by now, try pondering why dogs, doorbells, roosters and many other thigns sound different to many different cultures. Words such as ruff, or meow, or purr have no meaning in other countries such as Japan or China, so in reality those words don’t even exist in their culture. How do you think the original creator of words created words, and why do they actually mean what they do? The only thing that puts words with the “true” definitions are past experiences. When you are a baby you are taught that a bottle is something that you can drink out of, a shirt is worn on our upper bodies, and socks go on our feet, so that is how we are taught the meaning of…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of religious language considers whether it is possible to talk about God meaningfully if the traditional conceptions of God as being incorporeal, infinite, and timeless, are accepted. Because these traditional conceptions of God make it difficult to describe him, religious language has the potential to be meaningless. Theories of religious language either attempt to demonstrate that such language is meaningless, or attempt to show how religious language, while problematic, can still be meaningful. I personally believe that the arguments put forward by Maimonides offer a sufficient defence regarding religious language. The arguments raised by the logical positivists, although on the face of it strong arguments against religious language, fail as they themselves, once subjected to their own criterion, become meaningless.…

    • 7517 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will be discussing how the idea of God is incoherent due to many of his traditional attributes being mutually incoherent. God cannot possess many of his attributes together because they simply do not make sense.…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This argument is subject to a simple objection, introduced by asking, “Does God have a cause of his existence?”…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    religion esssay

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The commandment I choose which displays three types of Christ-like love is the 8th commandment, "Thou shall not steal".…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly all faiths have a liturgical and doctrinal language. For the Roman church it is Latin, for Sunni Islam it is Arabic and for Syriac Orthodox church, it is Syriac. Any crossing over of linguistic shreds from the liturgy of doctrine of one to the liturgy or doctrine of the other is important in many ways. If the same word appears in one faith as the other, or shares a common root or etymology, it may be assumed that it is not only the word and sound that are the same, but the very essence of what the word means. For example, in common translation from Italian to English, the word “villa” means “house”, but to a native speaker of English, “villa” does not simply mean house, it means as specific type or style of house, usually in a specific place or setting. Where as a house is a home or place of residence with a front door, 2 windows and chimney, a villa is a Mediterranean abode, with pool and olive groves. The significance of this linguistic phenomenon cannot in my opinion be underestimated.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The statement in the title is suggesting that non-cognitive language, or non-factual language, is inefficient at attempting to solve the relevant and evident issues with religious language. In this essay I will argue that although there are several innate flaws with non-cognitive language, I, on occasion, actually find it more helpful than cognitive language. This is because when using cognitive language it is often that people find themselves far more concerned with the meaning of the words, rather than the message, which they are trying to convey. This can often result in ‘loaded language’. But with non-cognitive the sole aim is to convey a meaning in a simple and effective manner, so it is less frequent for this approach to fail to achieve its aim. It achieves the same principle as when a picture ‘ paints a thousand words’. Although this may be the case it is clear that cognitive language is a far more successful approach to religious language. Thus throughout this essay I will argue that non-cognitive language does in fact cause more problems than it solves.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays