Explain Why College Tuition Should Not Be Free

A common remark that many hear today is that of people leaving college with the accumulation of debt. Although this is true in some cases, the problem does not lie with the current financial programs and aids. Instead, the problem falls squarely on the shoulders of the college attendee and their choices. If a student makes decisions that allow debt to fall upon them, a tuition-free system should not be set up just so they can leave college with less debt. Instead, some responsibility needs to be taken up and wiser choices need to be made. Also, with the prevailing system, students can get many grants and loans to get through college with little to no debt. Although it may be harder, college tuition should not be free because the solutions
Then they put the college-bound students on an excelled path, while the other kids receive a less excellent education path. In a sense, it can be looked at as a type of “education rationing.” This proves that those who make college free will not be able to keep up with the newfound demand. Their resources will be spread too thin, and they with need even more financial and government support. Also, even Germany doesn’t even have a level playing field with their current situation! With their model, they still have better off students that get a more “sought-after” education; another example of how the “solution” causes more problems. Another crucial factor to this debate is that Germany is looked at as a model for people that want tuition to be done away with. Why would the U.S. do the same thing Germany is when we see the drastic effects of it already? Most, if not all, of the effects are negatively impacting Germany’s economy and society. Even though people have good intentions, no matter what they
Bruenig states that “at age nineteen, only around 20% of children from the poorest 2% of families in the country attend college.” This as compared to the richest 2% of families where 90% go. He also says that the “attendance rates climb practically straight up the ladder.” This means that you are more likely to attend college if your parents have a higher income. Also according to Bruenig, kids from low-income families tend to attend two-year community colleges and cheaper four-year colleges. This is the complete opposite of students that come from higher-income families because those students are more likely to go to prestigious four-year colleges (Bruenig). This current dilemma of college attendance being based on family income may seem like a problem that needs to be solved. However, in the same article Bruenig also says that poorer kids basically pay no net tuition at public colleges. This is a huge piece of information because public colleges are the ones that would typically be made free if tuition was to be done away with. Later, Bruenig explains how “low-income students can also receive over two or three thousand dollars to offset living expenses.” Not to mention the many grants and benefits that are available to the poorer students, but not the richer ones. This all mounts to display that if low-income