There were multiple reasons why the farmers in Nazi Germany were dissatisfied by the Nazi policies towards agriculture. This was based upon the fact that the farmers wages had dramatically dropped behind those of the industrial workers. Even though the farmer’s wages had actually increased to 41% between 1933 and 1938, their wages were still lower compared to those of the industrial workers. By 1939 there were severe shortages in German agriculture and the wages of the workers was increasing very slowly due to this. Moreover the profits of industry increased more than the famers’ actual income. Furthermore the living conditions, because of the low wages of the famers, were poor, they received no help from the Nazis to remedy this.
Moreover, the Reich food estate was created to try and cut out the middle man from the agriculture business. Richard Darre made the Reich food estate incredibly bureaucratic; by 1939 it employed 20,000 full time officials and 113,000 unpaid officials. A strong undercurrent of peasant discontent began to appear. This was mainly due to the fact that the Reich food estate only applied to 20% of total farms and then held back expansion and modernisation in the farming industry. This then reduced the employment opportunities within the farming industries which didn’t help with the wages for farmers as they were not able to grow or expand to create a more expansive set of customers.
Furthermore was that the government pay off for farm loans really only went to the wealthier farms in German agriculture. The Nazis spent a total of 650,000,000 RM in the years of 1933-1936; this however only applied to the larger and wealthier farms. The smaller less ‘well off’ farms did not benefit from this pay out. This then meant that the farms that did not get the pay off were struggling to make ends meet in their business. Creating a sense of unease for the peasant farmers and a sense of hatred towards the Nazi ideals. The fact that the smaller farms had not had this pay out meant that they were losing hope in the Nazi power. They could not increase their wages through expansion as they were being held back by the Reich food estate and they had all these unpaid debts.
To conclude the Nazis policies towards farmers was very mixed and were seemingly put in place without much thought of the long term outcomes. It could be argued that through a combination of focusing heavily on heavy industry for the upcoming war, and the large scale implementation of bureaucracy, the Nazis pushed the farmers to the side, especially the small scale farmers, the farmers saw this and were not happy with the promises that never happened for them.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The troubles of a farmer were part of a larger economic problem that was affecting…
- 664 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Documents A-H reveal some of the problems that many farmers in the late nineteenth century(1880-1900)saw as threats to their way of life.(a)explain the reasons for agrarian discontent and(b)evaluate the validity of the farmers' complaints.…
- 402 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
With their promise of action on unemployment, the Nazi grew in popularity. They began to blame Jewish bankers for the problems,…
- 1497 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The populist Farmers were farmers that were generally angry over the increased amount of city industrialization and the decrease in agricultural farm land. Most farmers believed they were the reason America became successful and as developed as it is today. However, they believed that their original American government was being taken away from them. The developments that affected the farmers the most were factories, banks, and railroads. Farmers believed the developers tried to take away all of the hard earned money from them. The money spent on the equipment to take care of the crops and shipping in the long run was decreasing the farmers’ overall income as the cities’ industrialization grew. Most farmers borrowed money to afford taking care…
- 346 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
With these pieces of legislation in place the idea was to make the farming industry as prosperous as ever. Farming profits declines significantly after WWI due to…
- 1560 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The agrarian crisis as well as the depletion of livestock had profound effects on European society and economy. (Gottfried, 1985) Since the peasant have nowhere to produce, the…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Farm Labor Shortages during World War II. [online] Available at: http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe40s/money_03.html [Accessed 2 Nov. 2017]. migrationpolicy.org.…
- 1018 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The depression was a time of uncertainty, sorrow and pain. As a result, the farming industry was a very low point during the depression. People’s lives in farming were greatly influenced by the depression. Many people who were involved in farming were affected by the climate and economic instability causing many people to move to the cities.…
- 767 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Many farmers had been growing food and crops for the government during the war. However, when the war was over the farmers continued growing enormous amounts of food. They even applied and received substantial loans from the banks to then purchase larger and more efficient farming tools, supplies, and machines. They used these to massify their farms and reach larger production quotas than ever. The output during the duration of the next year was quantifingly greater than any previous year.…
- 914 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Thesis: The Gilded Age of American politics was the most corrupt and lowest point of our government. Although power was ripped from the hands of the people, it eventually led to much-needed reforms during the progressive-era.…
- 764 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hansen, Zeynep K., and Gary D. Libecap. "Small Farms, Externalities, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930s." Journal of Political Economy 112.3 (2004): 665-94. Print.…
- 1951 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
Another problem for both workers and farmer was urbanization: the rapid growth of cities. This ment less homing in the city for workers because more and more workers moved closed by factories in tenements that created sewer problems in the city. But with more growth ment they needed to expand the dense cities. Which would resulted in the farmers losing more land to create more room for these…
- 910 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The production of crops is measured by distribution and profit. The blacks depended on the land as their source of wealth and income. Many of the blacks worked on the farmland to maintain their livelihood. The aims of the farmers who participated in these movements was to have immediate change through political means. They were not satisfied with the deflation in the economy and the high tariffs. The price for transporting food and goods was high and they wanted political reform. The farmers established the Farmer’s Alliance. They were growing large amounts of wheat and selling it for a high profit. However, in the 1890's the global economy was affected and resulted in having to sell their crops at a low price. The production of wheat was high and this caused s deflation in the economy. Farmers were forced to mortgage their property and lost their land. The farmers felt that the government was not making any decisions in their favor to help with the economic deflation. The government raised prices on the railroad companies and left the farmers with no choice other than to pay the high freight rates. The farmers used the railroads to transport their foods and goods to the markets. Farmers felt that the economy should be a free economy and there should be no government intervention. However, it was time that…
- 609 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A number of Alphabet Agencies were created such as the Agricultural Adjustment Agency (AAA) and the Farm Credit Association (FCA) which were designed to give relief to those struggling from the Depression. Farmers had been in a terrible position before the New Deal due to overproduction. As 21% of the entire workforce was employed in agriculture, the measures had deep implications that affected society. Farm owners benefited from the New Deal tremendously, some evidence for this is farmers income doubled under the FCA from 1933 to 1939 and the AAA paid farmers to produce less so prices raised. Conversely, money given by the AAA was invested into machinery which resulted to thousands of sharecroppers and tenants being evicted. Although it was an unintentional effect, this measure forced thousands into unemployment. Additionally 6 million piglets and 10 million acres of cotton were ploughed up to reduce overproduction however alternative methods should have been used as these valuable materials and food were needlessly wasted. Ultimately everyone involved in agriculture was significantly affected by the New Deal. For some farm owners, Roosevelt’s agencies had re-establish confidence by implementing measures which restored wages and raised prices. Mechanisation increased efficiency but at the expense of sharecropper jobs and 20% of farm owners received AAA loans to avoid bankruptcy. The reason why the New Deal was so significant is because after the Depression, agricultural overproduction and the effects of the Dust Bowl left many farmers with unworkable land or faced bankruptcy from debt and hence everyone involved in the industry suffered greatly. As a result, the New Deal amended the majority these problems and most farmers experienced a large…
- 459 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Farmers play a huge role in the economy. No farmers. No food. The dust bowl, as well as the Great Depression, affected the farmers greatly. According to the article “Dust Bowl”, poor grain…
- 1148 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays