Preview

Explain Why There Will Always Be Wars Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
590 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why There Will Always Be Wars Essay
“There will always be wars”
Some people would agree with the statement because people will always have a difference of opinion. One person will always believe he or she is right in what they think, there will always be that one person who doesn’t want to just believe that he or she could be wrong, it’s basic human nature to fight over things such as; race, religion, land and wealth etc. As long as that continues in the world there will always be wars. For example “The conflict in Northern Ireland. “The troubles” the Republicans are Catholics who want to become an independent country. The Loyalists are Protestants who want to be part of the United Kingdom. In order to keep peace between them there is a peace wall, but I don’t think the peace wall keeps a lot of peace between them because of the negative feelings and violence associated with it.” There are not many quotes that support violence in neither the Bible nor any other
…show more content…

Pacifism is a commitment to solve problems without the use of violence; in particular it is the belief that war is always wrong. Some people are pacifist because they believe that it is, in principle, wrong to use violence. Other people are pacifist because they believe the damage done by war will be worse than any good it does, and this applies to the Northern Ireland peace wall, that the damage and ill feelings it is causing is worse than the actual good coming out of it. If people in Northern Ireland understood that then things would change. Many of Jesus’ teachings honour this behaviour. For example “When Jesus was arrested he would not let his disciples use violence to prevent his arrest” so therefore Christians who try to follow Jesus’ examples might try to say that because Jesus would not allow people to use violence to defend him, then violence is wrong, no matter what the case, and that peaceful methods should always be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the nonfiction novel "A Separate Peace" by John Knowles, there are many themes. One theme that appears in every chapter is "war and rivalry". The novel "A Separate Peace" presents many examples of the theme "war and rivalry" like World War 2, enlisting for the war, and Gene and Finny's egos.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pacifists are people who oppose to any war and violence, they believe that killing and harming people is wrong and therefore all wars must be wrong too. They think war is unjust and that all conflicts should be settled in a peaceful manner.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, pacifism during a war lowers morale. How can one expect to win a war if we do not fight back and try to end it? The only way people can have faith and confidence in defeating the enemy is if they know we will do what it takes to defeat it. George Orwell addresses how ignorant it is to be pacifism during a war that causes many…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Pacifism = The belief that it is wrong to use violence/war to settle disputes Prejudice = Forming an opinion before becoming aware of the relevant facts Racism = Poor treatment of / violence against people due to their race Reconciliation =…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pacifist: a person who opposes the use of war or violence to settle a dispute.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why do disagreements in history lead to war? The Texans fought so that they could be able to declare themselves an independent republic. The Texans dedication they were able to win significant battles such as the won Alamo in which lead to the Texans become independent. The issue between Mexico and Texas were that they could not find a boundary line. Mexico debated that the border line was somewhere near the Nueces river. And Texas debated that it was at the Rio Grande. Was the United states justified for going to war with Mexico? In my opinion they were. First because Mexico did not take Texas seriously and did not want to let them become an independent republic. Second, because the U.S. depended on this westward expansion, the U.S. was…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Nations Go to War

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In John Stoessinger’s work on “Why Nations go to War” he examines ten wars that have occurred since 1914 and the one currently taking place today. These wars include World War One, World War Two, Korean War, Vietnam War, Yugoslavian War, Indo-Pakistani War, Arab-Israel War, Iran-Iraq and Iraq-Kuwait War, War on Terror, and Wars in Rwanda and Darfur. Each of these wars have many things in common, but the one thing that sticks out above many of the other statistics and reasons is that “no nation that began a major war in the twentieth century emerged a winner” (Stoessinger 387). So after reading this quote you begin to ask yourself, why then would a nation choose to start a war and face the difficulties and often tragic outcomes that coincide with war. Stoessinger thesis on why nations go to war: nations go to war out of fear and misconception that leaders have of other nations.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Of Mice and Men

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A reason why this quote can be argued against is because in some circumstances it is acceptable such as if someone is threatening you to either turn away from your religion and join another religion or die it would be acceptable to kill yourself because you are doing it for religion.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In The Politics of Jesus, John Yoder’s over aching claim is that since Jesus is the Lord over humanity and defeated the ways of the world through non-violence, therefore we should be pacifists in the way. He claims that Jesus non-violent methods were seen as a threat to the established Jewish and Roman customs of His day (Yoder 59), showing how pacifism can pose a non-harmful threat towards the malevolent systems of this world. Responding illicitly to illicit conduct, according to the pacifist, is just as if not more detrimental to society, for violent “Resistance merely creates further evil and adds fuel to the flames (Bonhoeffer 141). Perhaps Dietrich Bonhoeffer describes the approach of pacifism the best in his book The Cost of Discipleship, by explaining that “Evil becomes a spent force when we put up no resistance. By refusing to pay back the enemy in his own coin…Violence stands condemned by its failure to evoke counter-violence… Suffering willingly endured is stronger than evil, it spells death to evil” (Bonhoeffer 142). An example, is when the Jewish people resisted the Romans, who were trying to eliminate Jewish laws and customs, the Jews, using peaceful means were successfully able to stand up to the Romans and preserve their law twice within a decade (Yoder 91-3). Whereas, when the Jewish Zealots tried to reinstate Jewish sovereignty in 66AD…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to McGraw-Hill (p.717), the word “total war” is defined as “warfare, in which the opposing states mobilize their civilian populations and all available resources to achieve victory.” The British Defense or “Defence” of the Realm Act became law on August 8, 1914. This emergency legislation was enacted by the King and gave him power to issue regulations for securing defense and overall safety of public interests. This legislation was enacted to prevent the spread of false reports and to prevent any assistance being given to the enemy.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we draw closer to the 28th of July, we will soon celebrate the 100th anniversary of the great war, or as we know it War World I. This was a long and very serious war that happened in 1914. One of the long term causes known as MAIN. Militarism, alliance system, imperialism and nationalism. But these were all old caused for the war.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Thousands entered the war, got just a taste of it, and then stepped out again permanently” (Clemens 149). Based on this, one can infer that many people signed up for war, underestimating the amount of fatigue and torment they would endure both mentally and physically, on and off the battlefield with their comrades. It seems as if the ones who signed up for the war only envision the glorious and prideful exterior, not putting into perspective the hardships that will unexpectedly come their way, and is definitely not something to be taken lightly or belittled. War should not be romanticized. There is more than meets the eye.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Warfare Is Wrong

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humanity always resolved their conflicts with one another with various weapons. The only difference is as over time, so do the methods of combat. Warfare is wrongfully defined as "the process of military struggle between two nations or groups of nations; war." (Warfare). This untrue definition induced many to wrongfully assume that only one type of warfare exists; Leading to believe it only happens on the battlefield during a war between countries. The actual definition of "warfare" doesn't imply military action or combat limited to only soldiers, yet it's defined as a direct act of aggression that ends with individuals emotionally or physically scarred.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On Conflict Theory

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    American society today is made up of all three of the theories. In my opinion, these theories all thrive off each other as a whole. I feel that the chain is something like this, Symbolic Interactionism, as well as Functionalism, lead into Conflict Theory. However, I feel that Conflict Theory is the largest component American society is made from, here is why!…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living by this moral principle can cause a greater harm by turning the other cheek than by using force to deminish a greater threat. There is always going to be people seeking out power or people who have different beliefs and morals because it is engraved within ourselves through generation after generation. Jan Narveson directly states a pacifists view, "His belief is not only that violence is evil but also that it is morally wrong to use force to resist, punish, or prevent violence. We are aggressive and greedy people and to change the thinking of the entire world with out the threat of force seems nearly impossible. Hypathetically, if pacifism was put into law, the use of any type of force will be breaking the law and the sentence is life in prison. Now imagine if a man breaks into a house of a young lady and rapes this lady and then pulls a gun out to shoot her. If the woman grabs the gun and shoots the man, she would also be sent to prison for life because any use of force is labelled as unacceptable. In our society today, violence is happening everyday even though we have laws in place to minimize them. Violence is not only a thing of the past but it is a thing of the future and without a proper punishment, violence will increase drastically. Narveson communicates a second version of pacifism where " one might argue that pacifism is desirable as a tactic: that as a matter of fact, some good end, such as the reduction of violence itself , is to be achieved by 'turning the other cheek'. " This again is a good theory, but if it was put into action, the consequences would be great. A human has the right to defend themselves, or help a person that is in need. In war it is the same thing but instead of one person needing help, it is a population worth of needed help. A person claiming they are a pure hearted pacifist by " turning the other cheek" does not necessarily make it the best…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays