Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Explicit Lyrics in Today's Society

Good Essays
470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explicit Lyrics in Today's Society
Explicit Lyrics in Today’s Society

The First Amendment states that everyone has a right to freedom of speech and expression. Explicit lyrics are just that:

expression through speech. Although explicit lyrics are protected under the first amendment, some people are more than 100%

against it and are hoping to have it change. They believe that some lyrics are too explicit, that they shouldn’t be listened to

because it’s “morally damaging,” and that use of explicit lyrics should be prohibited altogether. That’s like saying the use of the

phrase, “I love God,” is prohibited. Why is it okay to shout your adoration of a holy figure, but not okay to listen to lyrics depicting

sex, drugs, alcohol, etc.? Under the first amendment, that phrase is protected, just like explicit lyrics are.

The exact amendment is: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free

exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to

petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Basically what it states is that we, as Americans, have the right to say

what we want, to express ourselves in any way we choose, or to practice any religion, and congress cannot stop us. When many

think about the first amendment they feel they have the right to say anything that they want to say, which under the first

amendment is completely true, but those same people feel that explicit lyrics should not be covered by the first amendment. If

people had their freedom of speech taken away from them, like some people are trying to do by removing explicit lyrics, then

people will feel as if they can’t say what they feel. How would anyone feel if they couldn’t say what’s on their mind? Or if voicing

their opinion was illegal? Just like music artists would if explicit lyrics weren’t covered by the first amendment. The First Amendment says that everyone has a right to the freedom of speech. I believe explicit lyrics should be protected

as free speech by the first amendment, because that’s exactly what it is. We could go dance up and down Route 66, yelling

religion scriptures, and congress wouldn’t give two hoots about it. So, if we can do all that without it being punishable, why can’t

music artists put explicit lyrics in their songs? You can sit here and say anything and everything that comes to your head, write it

into a song, and publish it, explicit or not. So, if you have that right, shouldn’t music artists? Shouldn’t music artists, people just

like you, be able to express themselves in a way that they feel? Just like you do when you say you don’t support them or their

explicit lyrics? Yes.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first amendment gives American citizen's the right to free speech, and in Brownmiller's opinion the nation abuses that right. Obscenity laws have been in place since the early seventies, but according to Brownmiller, the Court has ruled sexually explicit content not obscene many times throughout history.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (http://www.law.cornell.edu).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gov 2301

    • 8560 Words
    • 35 Pages

    Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridge the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peacefully assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.…

    • 8560 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    But that music is considered art in the musicians’ eyes. Also the artists are exercising their freedom of speech by singing these lyrics. Also, why do they not just let the music industry regulate this songs and albums, since they know the artists better than the PMRC…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In clarification this means that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution prevents the government from setting up or establishing an official religion of the country. American Citizens have the freedom to attend any house of worship of their choice. It stops the government from making any laws that may stop people from saying what they feel or…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The First Amendment protects individuals “right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference” (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment).…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    GOVT 2306 Bill of Rights

    • 874 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People are free to express their opinions on any subject and the congress cannot make a decision as to which religion you choose to practice. Also, people are given the freedom to peacefully assemble in public.…

    • 874 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with Morgan’s claims because writing and singing are outlets for people to express their emotions and issues. I feel that lyrics all have a deeper meaning and purpose to them than just the actual words being said. Morgan makes valid points and explains and addresses…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PMRC Controversy

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Obscenity is not protected by the amendment and that is where a lot of controversy was caused. The line between what is obscene and what isn't obscene is hard to determine. Many proposals were made throughout the hearing, after all the debates, witnesses, and testimonials the case was finally settled. Even before the trial was complete the PMRC and RIAA had made a compromise. "Following the Hearing, on November 1 of 1985, the PMRC, and its ally the National Parents and Teachers Association, reached an agreement with the RIAA on the voluntary record label. The agreement stipulated that the printing of lyrics remained optional and, because of space limitations, cassettes were exempted, bearing only the imprint "see LP for lyrics". Since then, different record companies designed their own label containing the words "Parental Guidance - Explicit Lyrics" or some variation thereof"…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    religious restoration act

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Framers of the Constitution realized the importance of the freedom of religion. Therefore, the right to express religion freely became one of the unalienable rights that are listed under the 1st Amendment. All laws passed by Congress are not supposed to be restrictive to the practices of any religion, but sometimes, laws that were meant to be “neutral” restrict religious practices just as much as laws that were meant to work against religious practiced.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Citizens United Case

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (Linder, 2012a)…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or Abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble. And to petition the government for a redress of grievances" (U.S. Cost).…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (First Amendment Center, 2008)…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pop Songs Essay

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many topics out there that seem to appeal to the ears of the music industry. A popular approach is to objectify women by comparing them to animals or anything that is worth less of them. This approach is extremely popular, since it is adding to the long, long list of ways society is still oppressing women in the 21st century. While you are at it, you can focus on singing about either a woman’s chest or butt or maybe including both will land you a higher spot in the music charts. As your song becomes a top hit, sooner or later, you’ll hear a 14 year old boy singing about women’s body parts, and parents will praise the music industry for exposing young children to content that sexualizes the female body.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays