In this extract the extent of Goneril’s mercenary and ruthless behaviour towards her father and Gloucester has already been exposed. Within this extract Goneril is established as the ultimate villain and her husband the hero. Goneril’s relationship juxtaposes through her relation with both her husband and her lover, Edmund. This scene consists of great intensity with much drama, conflict and action as Shakespeare uses both Goneril and Albany to illustrate both chaos and order in relationships.
Goneril is portrayed as being sexually assertive, her use of euphemisms such as ‘mistress’, ‘stress and thy spirits’, and the imperative ‘decline your head: thus kiss’ implies of her sexual and intimate interactions with Edmund. This also is highlighted through Shakespeare’s use of sibilance with the repetitive‘s’ sound reinforcing Goneril’s seductive nature. Despite Goneril’s sexual desire emphasised in the extract lexis such as ‘conceive’ along with her mode of address towards Edmund such as ‘my lord’ suggests she has a genuine affection but is consumed by her passion and overriding emotions. Shakespeare uses sex as a symbolism of power within this extract to show his audience that through Goneril’s affair with Edmund her demise of the kingdom is becoming more apparent.
Goneril’s attitude towards Albany is portrayed negatively through her insults of male prowess. She uses labels him negatively as ‘mild’, ‘cowish terror’ and her modes of address such as ‘fool’ expresses her disgust and hatred towards her husband. She further humiliates her husband by accusing him of not being honourable because he is not fulfilling his duty of protecting his kingdom; this itself is ironic as Goneril’s affair with Edmund puts her own kingdom in jeopardy. Albany attitude towards Goneril is also one that is portrayed negatively. This is reinforced by the mode of address use such as the subhuman “devil” and “monster” along with the animalistic imagery lexis such as “tiger”. This contradicts the Elizabethan view ideology of women at the time as they were mild and timid not “barbarous” and “degenerate” which was more synonymous with masculine traits of the time.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The opening of the play clearly delineates he players in the conflict between good and evil. We are shown, for example, that Goneril’s speech seems rehearsed and the close-ups of the faces of Goneril and Regan demonstrate a lack of sincerity behind their words. Their self-satisfied smiles after delivering their professions of love indicate their calculating natures. By giving Cordelia’s reaction to her sisters as a voiceover, Blessed leaves us in no doubt as to her sincerity. The conflict between good and evil is highlighted by Blessed’s dramatisation of the battle scene in Act 5. tight close-ups of Goneril’s face as she venomously insults Albany and the deliberate, strongly evoked sadism of Regan in the scene when Gloucester’s eyes are put out are used to represent the extreme side of evil. Blessed contrasts these with tight close-ups of Edgar’s face after the “suicide” scene at Dover, showing the love and pity of son for father and the gentle persistence of Kent’s behaviour towards Lear in…
- 835 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Through ‘The Tragedy of King Lear’, Shakespeare represents a distinctive voice in which influences the way we perceive the role of power play in our world as it broadens our understanding of the universality and complexity of power play. Compared with the 21st century film ‘Brassed Off’, we are presented with an insight into the various means of attaining power and its ability to uncover the true nature of people within their struggle for supremacy and control. Shakespeare presents 'The Tragedy of King Lear' as the struggle for power and the political and filial machinations that the desire for power can create. Shakespeare focuses the distinctive voice around the central character King Lear who represents a conceited oppressor whose fall from power prompts the downfall of the Kingdom that he once controlled. The main cause of his demise is his failure to understand and possess a clear vision of the people around him. In Lear's eyes, he sees his eldest daughter Goneril’s facade to be a loyal and true expression, 'Sir I love you more than word can wield the matter/Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty', although Lear's inability to see the truth results in his manipulation and the banishing of his loyal acquaintances; his youngest daughter Cordelia and his dear friend Kent. Although Lear can physically see, it is the understanding, awareness and direction that he lacks and is blind to. In contrast to Lear being physically capable of seeing, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the form of vision that Lear lacks, and consequently Gloucester evades a corollary comparable to Lear's. Here Shakespeare presents his distinctive voice on power play through the depiction of the manipulation and motivation behind the characters struggle for sovereignty. His clever use of his characters and their relationships allows us to gain an insight into the condition of the human psyche throughout their individual attempts at power and highlights the complexities associated…
- 1100 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In this passage taken from King Lear by William Shakespeare, Edmund the illegitimate son of Gloucester and brother of Edgar, has clear rage for the stereotype he is placed under. Edgar, Gloucester’s legitimate son, will inherit all of his father’s land. By presenting the rage of Edmund Shakespeare carefully takes advantage of effective rhetorical devices in order to promote Edmund’s argument and further his stance on the issue. In this passage Shakespeare makes tactful use of repetition, and ponders multiple rhetorical questions in order to capture the extent of Edmund’s beliefs of jealousy and revenge.…
- 352 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Each character's ambitions eventually lead to the tragic fate of death. Goneril, Regan and Edmund are portrayed as ruthless cunning characters, but despite the sinister actions of the three, pathos can still be earned. Throughout Shakespeare's King Lear Goneril is deceived as an antagonist and ruthless character, however, when looking at the…
- 2033 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
With such powerful language and intonation, it sometimes is difficult for me to remember that King Lear is but an aged man, biased and occasionally foolish. In act two, he finally ostracizes Regan and Goneril by making sexist comments intending to wound both women. His speech has three distinct parts: distinguishing men from women, making a prayer for the present, and giving his threat for the future. Lear divides the world into two parts, one with animals, and the other with humans. The latter category is then again subdivided into men and women. He sees the section of men as like beasts, but women to almost have just a superficial view of the world by only caring about looks instead of substance. He mocks Regan and Goneril with their clothing- something he calls “gorgeous”, but it “scarcely keeps [them] warm.” Lear must consider himself to be like a beast in that he acts as he sees practical, like keeping knights that stay loyal to him as the only family he has left, which are “a reservation to be followed with such a number.” I think he is stumbling over what to say the entire speech, with interrupted sentences, apostrophe, and the use of prose, which might indicate feeling rushed and lack of time in which he would usually have spoken poetry. By discussing sexism, it seems to be an easy play of Lear’s to make that will surely injure Regan and Goneril, even though both are quite masculine in their powers. In the next section, he creates another sexist divide by assigning different responses to hardship per gender. Even his speech shows his condescending beliefs for women by using the soft ‘w’ sound alliteratively in line 319. “…women’s weapons, water drops,” are contrasted with what Lear wants- “noble anger” that is more suited to him as a man. Even the thought of crying would “stain [his] man’s cheeks” in an act of weakness. While characterizing grief as womanly, Lear again associates being female as a deficiency in that one…
- 372 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The comedic structure of the play, allows for the reduction of Elizabethan social paradigms through the use of a utopian pastoral setting. The play begins in disharmony and banishment in the ‘perilous court’. Being excluded from the court, Rosalind’s notion of identity is challenged. Her exile, triggered because she is ‘thy father’s daughter’, causes her alienation, shocking the values held by Shakespeare’s 17thcentury audience. Rosalind and Celia shed their old identities, along with the burdens of court life, for new ones as Aliena and Ganymede, their theatrical disguise adding humour to their search for a new acceptance and a safe place of belonging.…
- 501 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare informs the reader of the modifications needed in society to prevent capitalism from overthrowing the traditional aristocratic ways. Through Goneril and Regan, the dangers of bourgeoisies and proteltarists are evident and the negative effects they cause. With the differing social orders, lineage becomes trivial. Blood no longer matters and wealth depends heavily on market exchange. Scholars highlight the difficulties and dangers of utopian concepts, especially when they are centered on bourse. He discusses the many social climbers who attempt to behave badly to gain status from the new capitalist power. The conflict between the idea of human liberty and the traditional order is resolved in the play by transforming the king into an item of pathos. By “humanising” the king, Shakespeare is able to fuse together the two ideas regarding absolutist authority and individual…
- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
How does Lear’s remark “I am a man more sinn’d against than sinning” reflect his development as a human being within the play?…
- 1017 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The love test at the beginning of Act 1, scene 1, sets the tone for this extremely complicated play, which is full of emotional subtlety, conspiracy, and double-talk, and which swings between confusing extremes of love and anger. Lear’s demand that his daughters express how much they love him is puzzling and hints at the insecurity and fear of an old man who needs to be reassured of his own importance. Of course, rather than being a true assessment of his daughters’ love for him, the test seems to invite—or even to demand—flattery. Goneril’s and Regan’s professions of love are obviously nothing but flattery: Goneril cannot even put her alleged love into words: “A love that makes . . . speech unable / Beyond all manner of so much I love you” (1.1.59); Regan follows her sister’s lead by saying, “I find she names my very deed of love; Only she comes too short” (1.1.70–71).…
- 5068 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One example of how ageism is portrayed in the conversation between Goneril and Regan is when they discuss King Lear’s poor judgement. While Regan and Goneril discuss what they should do about their foolish old father, Goneril says, “You see how full of changes his age is. The observation we have made of it hath not been little. He always loved our sister most, and with what poor judgment he hath now cast her off appears too grossly” (1.1.290-93). This quote demonstrates that with age, Lear’s judgement is questionable because he is acting in a very thoughtless way by doing things like disowning his favourite daughter, Cordelia. Goneril and Regan continue to speak about…
- 641 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Despite his initially cordial relationship with Goneril, Albany soon realizes that his wife is an appalling woman. He later compares his wife and her sister to “tigers” showing the readers that Albany has become fully aware of Goneril’s cruelty (4.2.40). He is not the only character in the play with this understanding, as Kent also calls Lear’s daughters “dog-hearted” (4.3.45), an adjective used to describe inhumane and cruel people. Goneril and Regan, however, are not the only ruthless individuals in the play; Edmund is seen to be equally heartless. Edmund's betrayal of his family does not go unnoticed as Albany calls him a “gilded serpent” and Edgar refers to his brother as a "toad-spotted traitor” (5.3.85, 137). By calling Edmund a “serpent” and a “toad-spotted traitor”, metaphors that symbolize evil, the readers recognize that Albany and Edgar fully condemn Edmund’s behavior throughout the play (5.3.85, 137). The use of animal imagery in this scenario also enriches the reader’s understanding of Edmund, one of the play’s central…
- 730 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
[ 17 ]. The words that spoken by the Fool could have enraged Goneril were such: ‘A fox, when one has caught her,/ And such a daughter,/ Should sure to the slaughter,/ If my cap can buy a halter’ – McCoy’s Fool does not speak these words, as he probably is intended by the director as a harmless and joyful character.…
- 2936 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
| Go find the traitor Gloucester. Tie him up like a thief and bring him here to me.…
- 256 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In King Lear, one of the most famous quotes is said by the Duke of Albany, who is married to Goneril. After Goneril has driven away her father, King Lear, from her…
- 1499 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The play Edward II reaches its emotional climax in scene i, Act V. It is in this scene that the king’s image as an irresponsible and weak person undergoes a total transformation, and he emerges before the audience as a tragic figure in his understanding of the worthlessness of a king stripped of power just like the King in King Lear. Historically Edward II might not have shown this kind of tragic understanding of life. It is here that one has to look for the poet in the dramatist who expressed the renaissance anxiety for the helplessness of the human beings before Time. In the context of the drama, however, the understanding of the futility of human endeavour is related to another personal fact of the king; in fact, he lost the desire to live after Gaveston’s death, who was half his self. In other words, the king is under the control of death-instinct. With this he has also lost the desire for pomp and pleasure, and what he cares for now are his sense of honour, betrayal, conspiracy and anxiety for the future of his son. His refusal to surrender the crown to the Bishop of Winchester is a symbolic overture to defy Mortimer’s authority. And this is necessary for the dramatist also in reversing the sway of sympathy of the audience in the king’s favour.…
- 824 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays