Performance Framework: The Roles of Multinational Corporation Network
Strength, Market Responsiveness, and
Product Innovation
Ruby P Lee
.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to extend the traditional environment–strategy–performance framework by including network theory to examine when a foreign firm can use its multinational corporation (MNC) network strength to buffer market turbulence and technological turbulence and when the foreign firm can deploy it to support the influences of marketing strategic postures (i.e., market responsiveness and product innovation) on firm performance. The author tests the hypotheses on data collected from 140 foreign firms in China. Although prior research has demonstrated that firms often use multiple strategies and resources to cope with environmental forces, the findings illustrate that different environmental segments have unequal bearings on market responsiveness, product innovation, and MNC network strength. In addition, despite the direct positive influences of individual marketing strategic postures and MNC network strength on firm performance, their combined effects are mixed. The author concludes with a discussion of the implications of these results for research and practice.
Keywords: network strength, market responsiveness, product innovation, environmental forces, China
ncreasingly, multinational corporations (MNCs) no longer simply view emerging countries as manufacturing bases; instead, they recognize their market potential and have begun to develop firm strategies that suit these unfamiliar and turbulent host country environments (Luo and Park 2001; Tan and Litschert 1994).
This conjecture is consistent with the traditional environment–strategy–performance framework, which suggests that a firm must be able to scan and make sense of its external environments and then identify strategy to align with such external conditions for success (e.g.,
Child
References: Ahuja, Gautam (2000), “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3), 425–55. Aiken, Leona S. and Stephen G. West (1996), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Andersson, Ulf, Mats Forsgren, and Ulf Holm (2002), “The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational ———, ———, and ——— (2007), “Balancing Subsidiary Influence in the Federative MNC: A Business Network View,” Argote, Linda and Paul Ingram (2000), “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms,” Organizational Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku (2005), “Resolving the CapabilityRigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (October), 61–83. Bartlett, Christopher A. and Sumantra Ghoshal (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Buckley, Peter J. and Martin J. Carter (2004), “A Formal Analysis of Knowledge Combination in Multinational Enterprises,” Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (5), 371–84. Burt, Ronald S. (1997), “The Contingent Value of Social Capital,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2), 339–65. Chang, Sea-Jin, Arjen van Witteloostuijn, and Lorraine Eden (2010), “From the Editors: Common Method Variance in Child, John (1972), “Organizational Structure, Environment, and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice,” Sociology, Cohen, Jacob (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2d ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cui, Anna Shaojie, David A. Griffith, and S. Tamer Cavusgil (2005), “The Influence of Competitive Intensity and Market Daft, Richard L. and Karl E. Weick (1984), “Towards a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems,” Academy of ———, Marie Louise Mors, and Bjorn Løvås (2005), “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Multiple Networks, Multiple Phases,” Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5), 776–93. ——— and Nitin Nohria (2004), “Organizing Multinational Companies for Collaborative Advantage,” in The Global DeSarbo, Wayne S., C. Anthony Di Benedetto, Michael Song, and Indrajit Sinha (2005), “Revisiting the Miles and Snow Inkpen, Andrew C. and Eric W.K. Tsang (2005), “Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer,” Academy of Management Review, 30 (1), 146–65. Doz, Yves L. and C.K. Prahalad (1991), “Managing MNCs: A Search for a New Paradigm,” Strategic Management Journal, Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 53–70. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Behnam N. Tabrizi (1995), “Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Kogut, Bruce and Udo Zander (1993), “Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation,” Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (4), Fornell, Claes and David F. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 39–50. Lages, Luis Filipe, Graca Silva, and Chris Styles (2009), “Relationship Capabilities, Quality, and Innovation as Determinants of Export Performance,” Journal of International Marketing, 17 (4), 47–70. Garcia-Pont, Carlos, J. Ignacio Canales, and Fabrizio Noboa (2009), “Subsidiary Strategy: The Embeddedness Component,” Journal of Management Studies, 46 (2), 182–214. Lee, Ruby P. and Qimei Chen (2009), “The Immediate Stock Returns on New Product Introductions: The Role of Firm Ghoshal, Sumantra and Christopher A. Bartlett (1990), “The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network,” Academy of Management Review, 15 (4), 603–625. Granovetter, Mark (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–80. ——— (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, Greene, William H. (2005), Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Grein, Andreas, C. Samuel Craig, and Hirokazu Takada (2001),