Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

To what extent should the government intervene in the economy to protect the public interest?

Better Essays
1425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent should the government intervene in the economy to protect the public interest?
An economic system is an organized approach to producing and distributing goods and services. It is scarcity (in economic theory, the limited availability of resources and goods; the excess of wants over needs), which creates a need for economic systems. There are different types of economic systems in which all are believed to be the correct solution when it comes to scarcity. Capitalism is based on an approach to economics that promotes private enterprise. In a private enterprise system, you will see profit, initiative, competition, incentive and self-advancement. Socialism is an economic philosophy that stresses public ownership of the means of production rather than private ownership. Underlying this philosophy is the belief that this system is morally better because it reduces the gap between the rich and the poor. In socialism, there is government involvement in the economy, either through control or ownership of productive resources. Socialists believe that the government should provide basic necessities for all, as well it believes in competing political parties chosen to govern by majority rule, with minority rights guaranteed. The economic systems of nations in today's world are not simply capitalist or socialist. Economic systems now have elements of both capitalism and socialism. They are mixed economies. Canada is a mixed economy because it has a unique combination of capitalist and socialist policies. Government intervention basically means the amount of involvement the government will have in the economy. For Capitalism to work there must be little or no government involvement in the economy. For socialism to work there must be complete government intervention in the economy, where as in Canada there is some government involvement in the economy, but people have the freedom and individualism to do as they wish like in Capitalism. Some people believe that governments have a responsibility to protect the public good by regulating the activities of the private sector in the economy. Others support deregulation, believing that government intervention in the economy is really interference. The question is to what extent should the government intervene in the economy to protect the public interest? I believe that Canada should remain a mixed economy where there is some government involvement to accomplish certain economic goals as well as freedom and individualism. Firstly, there should definitely be government intervention in Canada to ensure that monopolies do not exist. Secondly, a problem with capitalism or private enterprise economies is that there is recurring depressions and unemployment that emerge as a pattern of economic changes. Lastly, as a mixed economy people still have incentives as well as individualism to make a profit. In this essay, the following three features to a mixed economy will be examined and explained in depth for a better understanding as why Canada should remain a mixed economy.

Firstly, there should definitely be government intervention in Canada to ensure that monopolies do not exist. A monopoly basically means Ownership or control of certain industries by a limited number of business participants or government. Monopolies tend to exist amongst a Capitalist form of government. Capitalism is an economic system which is based upon certain beliefs about human nature. Capitalism reflects the view that people desire to operate relatively free of economic restrictions and control. Basically, a capitalist wants to be as free as possible from government interference and it is this which allows for monopolies to exist. Although there is freedom in this type of economy only a small number of people become very wealthy and eliminate possible competitions. These people who become very wealthy have the ability to control large sections of the economy because of shrewd business dealings. A monopoly exists when no competition is present. A player wins at the game monopoly when that player owns everything and there is no longer competition. When a producer has a monopoly, the consumer is no longer sovereign, prices are not set by supply and demand, and therefore the system cannot function effectively. As a mixed economy there is competition but more so there is government regulation to ensure that these types of monopolies do not exist. In other words the economy is not completely in the hands of the people, small business are allowed to exist and people are allowed to make a profit but here there is more quality into the work as in a free market economy, people look for the cheapest method of creating a popular product.

Secondly, a problem with capitalism or private enterprise economies is that there is recurring depressions and unemployment that emerge as a pattern of economic changes. In a Capitalist economy there exists a major gap between the rich and the poor. This is due to the ideas of individualism, which means that some people will do well and others will not. Small numbers of businesses become very wealthy allowing for monopolies to exist where these small businesses have control over economic decision making. One of the major problems capitalist nations must deal with on an ongoing basis is an economic event known as the business cycle. This means that the economy will go through periods of boom (good times) and bust (bad times). Private- enterprise economies go through unstable business cycles because of the lack of government intervention. Although Capitalism sees its peak during economic busts it is not soon before it sees its lows where there is high unemployment, low-profits and very little production. It is this reason that Canada should remain a mixed economy where there is an amount of government involvement in economic decision making. A safe amount of government intervention would result in higher incomes, production and employment, which would then lead to expansion.

Lastly, as a mixed economy people still have incentives as well as individualism to make a profit. In Canada there is some government involvement in the economy, but people have the freedom and individualism to do as they wish like in Capitalism. As a mixed economy Canada places a high value on choice and freedom. Economic freedom reinforces the political and social freedoms of a society. In Canada government regulation and or intervention does not stop a competition from occurring, in Canada there is individualism of Competition. Here consumers are free to choose the products they desire. They can choose what to buy, where to buy it, and for how much. If they feel a product is too expensive, they choose not to buy it. Instead, they may choose a similar product with a better price tag. Producers also have the freedom to enter the market and produce a product they think will sell (and that meets government standards). These two freedoms (for producers and consumers) will lead to competition, a necessity in the market economy. When competition is present, consumers can compare products and prices for competing producers and reward the best producer by buying his or her product. Producers whose product does not sell must either improve or else go out of business.

In conclusion, I believe that Canada should remain a mixed economy where there is some government involvement to accomplish certain economic goals as well as freedom and individualism. Firstly, there should definitely be government intervention in Canada to ensure that monopolies do not exist. A monopoly exists when no competition is present. A player wins at the game monopoly when that player owns everything and there is no longer competition. When a producer has a monopoly, the consumer is no longer sovereign, prices are not set by supply and demand, and therefore the system cannot function effectively. Secondly, a problem with capitalism or private enterprise economies is that there is recurring depressions and unemployment that emerge as a pattern of economic changes. In a Capitalist economy there exists a major gap between the rich and the poor. This is due to the ideas of individualism, which means that some people will do well and others will not. Private- enterprise economies go through unstable business cycles because of the lack of government intervention. Although Capitalism sees its peak during economic busts it is not soon before it sees its lows where there is high unemployment, low-profits and very little production. It is this reason that Canada should remain a mixed economy where there is an amount of government involvement in economic decision making. Lastly, as a mixed economy people still have incentives as well as individualism to make a profit. In Canada there is some government involvement in the economy, but people have the freedom and individualism to do as they wish like in Capitalism. As a mixed economy Canada places a high value on choice and freedom.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capitalism is an economic system where the government is hands off of businesses and people work to make profit, it is based off of private ownership. In document one of the DBQ, it states that capitalism is "based on the private ownership of capital, and on the production of goods and services for profit" (document 1). Even though it may sound like a good idea, many people were unhappy with capitalism because on lthe people who took the risk to invest money were wealthy and everyone else, for the most part was poor. The solution to these problems were new ideas of economic systems. Socialism was one idea. Socialism was an economic system where there is eocnomic equality and the government owns big industries. Documemnt four of the…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide Ch. 1-5

    • 6679 Words
    • 38 Pages

    Socialism is when the key industries are owned and controlled by the government such as transportation, banking. Private ownership and small business are allowed to varying degrees.…

    • 6679 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A socialist system is more likely to response immediatelI to emergency situation like the one that occurred in Haiti . In a socialist system, there is division of labor and quotas. No one waits for a leadership role to be held. Everyone is delegated a task and acts according. A socialist system is based on the good deed of the country and their efforts to help the region in need. Also , the government would be the one in distributing goods and services to the people ensuring that everyone will be able to receive assistance. The government ensures that everyone is getting relieve. The only disadvantage is that a social system does not have the mass resources that a capitalistic or other systems may have. For example, Haiti has been able to distribute the work needed to rebuild…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>Socialism is one of the roles of government in the economy. Adam Smith, who is the father of capitalism, believes in laissez-faire, "hands off" the government. He believes all production should be sale at the best possible lowest price. (Doc 5) While Adam Smith believes in capitalism, Engel is criticizing it. Engel believes the capitalism seizes everything for themselves but not the poor, they remain nothing. (Doc 7) Karl Marx, the author of a 23 page pamphlet, "The…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and Socialism are different kinds of economic systems which work in different ways throughout the world. Capitalism is a system that allows people to access a free market, whereas, socialism is an economic system controlled by government which promotes equality for all but provides less options for improvement. Most countries of the world fall into one of these economic systems, and the capitalist countries tend to have stronger economies than the countries with the socialist system. There are many different points of view which argue that the capitalism works better than socialism; however, this essay will compare and contrast both systems and demonstrate which one works better. Venezuela and Cuba will be used as the primary examples…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socialism is the means of all aspects of the economy and owned and is regulated by the community. The founder of this theory, Karl Marx, is usually associated with Communism. While Socialism is considered a lower stage of communism, it is actually the middle of the economic systems (Capitalism, Communism, and Socialism). Communism has more of an underlying political effect, whereas Socialism and Communism do not. By Socialism controlling the means of production, this diminishes the idea or private businesses.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many types of capitalism but the main ones that mostly everyone knows are free-market capitalism, state capitalism, and social market economy. Free-market capitalism is a free-price system where demand and supply are allowed to reach equality without the government interfering. State capitalism consists of a state-ownership of profit-seekers that operate very capitalistic in a market economy. Social market economy acts as a free-market, normally, where the government intervention in price formation is kept to a minimum but the state provides for moderate to extensive provision of social security, unemployment benefits, and recognition of labor rights through collective bargaining schemes.…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and Socialism are very different. Capitalism, for instance, is an economic system where the production of goods is regulated by the people as well as the selling of goods. People own most of the companies, not the government. Their market is reliant on supply and demand. This causes companies that are incompetent to go out of business, and efficient companies to prosper. It also offers the consumer a better quality good for the least amount of money. Socialism on the other hand, is very different. In a Socialist economy, the government owns most of the prosperous companies. The government then regulates how much of a product is produced, distributed and how much the good will cost the consumer.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capitalism and communism are different in their political and economic ideologies. The most clear difference is there industry. In the communism world industry is own by the state. On the other hand, in a capitalistic world industry can have private owners. While the profit of any enterprise is equally shared by all the people in communism, the profit in a capitalist structure belong to the private owner only. Whereas the private party controls the resources in capitalism, it is the society that controls the whole means of production in communism. Another difference is that for Communists, the society is above individuals. But for capitalists, individual freedom is above everything, the state or the society. The capitalist system is an self regulated economy, whereas communism is an economy run by the state. Also in capitalism, the individual has full control over production and decides on the prices. Contrary to this, it is the society or the government…

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whereas Socialism, according to the Marxists Theory, is something in-between Capitalism and Communism; A political and economic ideology where the government has almost complete control over trade, capital, land, and the production and distribution of goods. Thus encouraging the formation of a welfare state. In countries such as Cuba and other countries who employ Socialistic practices land is completely owned by the government, unlike America, where the majority of land is privately owned by the individuals of America. While some people will argue that capitalism is all about greed and has caused the inequality that is so frequently spoke of by politicians, protesters, and news and media outlets. Many think the solution to this inequality is to employ more Socialistic ideals, what some refer to as Marxism 2.0; however, as Socialism is European countries is proving, that is not the…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism And Socialism

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capitalism and socialism are economic systems that both began in 1750. In my opinion, capitalism is a better system because it includes private property and capital accumulations. Capitalism affords economic freedom. It also affords consumer choice and economic growth. Capitalism and socialism are somewhat opposing schools of thought in economics. The central arguments in the socialism vs. capitalism debate are about economic equality and the role of government.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe the United States government’s role should be to take care of the citizens of the United States. The government should always take care of the people. Without the citizens, there would be no such thing as government.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Span of control is refers to the number of direct reports a manager has. In other words it states the number of employees can a manager efficiently and effectively manage. The optimal numbers of subordinates supervised by a single executive is 5 to 6 in an average firm. It is importantly to note that managers that have more than six subordinates would soon lose track of what is going on in the organisation. Therefore the number of direct reports a manager can handle depends on the nature of the work being supervised, how visible the performance of subordinates is and the extent of decentralisation within an organisation. Generally, if the work performed by subordinates is routine then the performance of subordinates is visible and easy to measure,…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism on the other hand is focused on working for individual growth, and personal ownership to provide wealth for one's self. Communism places the economy in governments hands, while capitalism removes the government from the economy entirely. Communism sets direct demands on the work you do and what you need to produce, so others can benefit as well as you from your hard work. Communism asks the government to decide what is needed for each individual to live and be equal. The government tells the community what demands need to be meets to produce and distribute enough materials equally. Capitalism depends on supply and demand instead of quotas, in order to make sure there is not too much or too little of certain products. If there is not enough of a product wanted then the price will rise, which will in turn cause production to increase. Once there is more than enough of that product on the market, the demand will begin to drop, resulting in the price and production to drop and so on. Capitalism creates a system where peoples first concern is themselves, rather than the others, making things a personal investment instead of community investment. Communism is built on the idea that humans are inherently just, and as such will work not just for themselves, but for their countrymen as well. Capitalism is built on the idea…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism Vs Healthcare

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socialism and capitalism are, without a doubt, two somewhat opposing economic thoughts and system. Most of the arguments that come up when debating about these systems center on equality and the role of government in our economy. Socialists' beliefs include the idea that inequality is inferior to the success of the economy and society, and that…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays