Around the beginning of part 2 Faber says, “Do you know why books such as this are so important? Because they have quality. And what does the word quality mean? To me it means texture. This book has pores” (Bradbury 88). I think this is an example of how people become ignorant. When Faber is saying the book has pores, I think he saying since it has pores it makes you really think about what it is saying. If people cannot read the books and just live in their own little world they will not be able to actually think about the meaning of things. Reading books make people think, why? When the firemen are burning all these books in the society, the people will not be able to think or gain knowledge. They will all have the same intelligence they did when they were 10. This is not the only example Bradbury shows.
In the story, Mildred has a room with a 3 wall television. She is always in there and her family is her family in the television. She is always watching it that she thinks it is reality. I think that her watching television all the time that is has affected her memory. For example, when Montag walks in the bedroom he feels, “Complete darkness, not a hint of the silver world outside... a chamber a tomb world where no sound from the great city could penetrate” (Bradbury 15). His wife is so sucked into this room that one time Mildred had kept taking her pills forgetting that she took one. Her brain has been drained by the television. She has not thought about anything else which caused her to have short term memory. All she did was watch television and you do not have to think when you are watching television.
In the You Have Insulted Me letter Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. wrote, “You should also resolve to expose your children to all sorts of opinions and information, in order that they will be better equipped to make decisions and to survive” (192). I agree with what he is saying. If there is hidden information from your children and they go out into the world, it would be hard for them to face a problem or challenge they have. For example, if these parents had a child and home schooled her her whole life, it would be difficult for her to go out and be social with her peers. Also, if she had a problem with someone, she would not know what to do. I think this is just like hiding books from people. If you hide important information from people it causes them to be less open minded.
In conclusion, I think that censoring material causes ignorance and stupidity for someone. If you do not want to see or hear something, then do not. Let the other person do what they want and just avoid them. There is no reason to get offended if someone likes to do something or read something that you do not. I think if people were more open minded and less hypocritical I think we would not have this problem today. If you want to do what you want, another person should be able to also, but people nowadays do not think well because they are too into their video games or television and their brains just get drained out. I believe if more of the population actually tried to understand the meaning of things, we would all be less ignorant and stupid.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Consider the role of television in the film; and how it used in society. What role does it play in this culture of the film and why is it preferred to reading? Usually, the parlor walls contain large wall-sized television screens. They put a screen that is as large as the wall in a particular room, and if they can get all four walls of a room covered in television screens, then you have a total and complete interactive and entertainment package. At the beginning of the movie, Mildred and Montag have three T.V. walls in their "parlor" or living room, and Mildred is hinting around to Montag that she wants yet another one. However, the cost for a T.V. wall that is exorbitant it is nearly a third of Montag's yearly salary, which makes it so expensive; so it is a hard decision to make for him and his wife.…
- 930 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Books reflect life. “It's not books you need, it's some of the things that once were it books..the same infinite detail and awareness could be projected through radios and televisions, but are not” said Faber. Showing Montag technologies once in the past that are also stories in books. Televisions, phones and radios are used in ways such as making your voice heard. “We are living in a time when flowers are trying to live on flowers, instead of growing on good rain and black loam” said Faber. There isn't room to grow and be free. Everything is being watched and controlled without having a voice. Books reflect life such as the chapter's go by what's next not…
- 456 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Fahrenheit 451, a dystopian novel, Ray Bradbury portrays Mildred as an extremely unintelligent character who does not connect with reality throughout the book. Mildred us very caught up in her television “family” which Montag questions, do they “Love you, love you very much, love you with all their heart” (page). This ascertains that Mildred shows qualities of being absent minded. As a human being separating television from reality should be a skill that is possessed because their are huge differences between the two settings. Mildred is presented as a character that can not tell the difference which causes Montag to ask her that otherwise very odd question. Moreover, Mildred is very dismissive of actions…
- 371 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although I don’t agree with most forms of censorship, I feel as if it is important in certain situations. For instance, television must be censored because all age groups watch it, and it influences younger children’s behavior because they have seen it on television. Not to mention anyone at any time can watch TV. Whereas censoring books is completely different. The reader has the option to read the book, making the author not reliable. Not just any age group can pick up a book and begin to read the content. But a six-month-old baby can sit in front of a television and be influenced by the action of a criminal. Certain things influence certain age groups and I feel as if books shouldn’t be responsible. You have to actually read a book; you cannot just sit and watch the pages. I feel as if censorship should appeal to only things that require it, and in my opinion, books do not require censorship.…
- 1243 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Mildred highly depends on technology and the distraction it gives her. She shows this demonstration of her distraction when she continually ignores Montag during a conversation over turning the television or “parlor” down. While he lays sick in bed he asks for aspirin and she again ignores his simple request of a “sick man” as he puts it. Mildred no longer cares for her real family, but only for her “family” or her parlor, which is a four-walled television room (Bradbury, 48). Some seem to think “Books are taking a backseat to technology” with iPads and nooks; books do seem to be taking a backseat. Past authors have wisdom and understanding in their books and it is always important to have an authenticity to a book. Also research shows that screens may heart your eyes after looking too long. This supports what Bradbury has to say and teach…
- 690 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In a society where books are burned, and a mindless man is the government’s goal, their two greatest weapons are disguised as what seems like harmless technology. Bradbury uses the seashells within the novel as a symbol to represent the depth and importance the government places on the effects of propaganda. As Montag comes home from work he notices just how effective these seashells of propaganda truly are when he sees “His wife stretched on the bed, uncovered and cold, like a body displayed on the lid of a tomb, her eyes fixed to the ceiling by invisible threads of steal, immovable. And in her ears the little Seashells, the thimble radios tamped tight, and an electronic ocean of sound, of music and talk and music and talk coming in, coming in on the shore of her unsleeping mind. The room was indeed empty...There had been no night in two years that MIldred had not swam that sea...” (12). Through the dependency Mildred has on the seashells Bradbury shows how easily the government makes it’s citizens numb and mindless, thus exposing the corrupt society. Bradbury uses the parlor family as another symbol to represent superficiality. This is an example of another tactic the government utilizes to create a society of mindless men. The parlor families…
- 1169 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
There could be many reasons why people have to need to censor, and it usually depends on the type of government a certain country has and the type of citizens they have. And by type I mean by their race, religion, what they are interested in, what they do as a career, etc. A good example of this situation could be the book “Fahrenheit 451”. Besides from comic books and pornography, every single type of books are censored, from the religious texts to the fiction chapter books. Although books are the main things that are censored from this society, but without books, many other things have changed. Things such as it is illegal to be a pedestrian because people don’t have time to drive slowly and stop for others, therefore people drive really fast and if someone is pedestrian, they could get run over.…
- 763 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In Bradbury's novel, the need for communication is filled by materialistic goods. Montag's wife Mildred is a prime example of this social norm. Like many other community members, Mildred spends the majority of her time in the parlor with her "family", or also known as the characters on television. "These "parlor walls" bring a whiff of life to the dull routine of the residents of the city in which the novel takes place, providing a "family"--capable of pseudo-interaction with the viewers--to replace the nonexistent family life" (Ray Bradbury and the Assault on Free Thought). Montag finds this appalling and even mocks Millie and her "family" by saying '"...does the White Clown love you?"' (73). Millie doesn't answer her husband because she's afraid. Millie secretly knows that these characters aren't her "family" but doesn't want to admit that her relationships are fictional, because she and does not know how to communicate with actual people. So like many others within their society, Millie chooses to live in ignorance to avoid the reality of her internal unhappiness, which only proves to increase her feelings of…
- 967 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe censorship is acceptable because it’s very much needed in today’s society. Not all movies or music are meant for a younger age group. There are specific genres and ratings for children because most adults believe they should be “shielded” from the topics discussed or depicted. The NC-17 rating is perfect for those people who enjoy seeing brains ripped out of a person’s head. Also censorship is acceptable because there is larger variety of movies for parents to see while their child watches a PG…
- 683 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The people in Montag’s society don’t think and feel like the people in today’s society do. Mildred, who is Montag’s wife, spends most of her time taking in mindless media. She is so consumed by the parlor walls and the Seashells that she no longer spends time with her husband. When asked,…
- 726 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For the majority of the book, Montag believes that books are what is missing in his life, but as faber goes on to explain “Do you know why books such as this are so important? Because they have quality. And what does the word quality mean? To me it means texture. This book has pores.” () Faber is explaining how books produce a true experience, that is an experience that isn't hollow or shallow. Books are not the only thing that can carry this kind of weight, TV and radio could easily contain such sustenance, it is just not demanded by the people anymore. Montag is not happy because the world he lives in is just distractions full of bright colors, sugar, and noises. There no time to analyze, there is no need to think.…
- 680 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The act of censorship has many consequences, one of them being the inability to think for oneself. If people are not presented with controversial material they won't be able to form their own opinions or ideas. This allows those in power to easily control and brainwash its citizens through censored information. The people of this society have no other choice but to believe the information…
- 693 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
People have a right to access information that they perceive useful to them from any content within their reach. Censoring would hinder people from getting the right to information, especially that dealing with their nation, development and security. Censoring, therefore, hinders people from gaining access to info that can be used to bring about positive changes in the society. In most developing countries, books that are thought to have a likelihood of creating unrests but this hinders people from having information about their civil rights. Censoring, therefore, hinders people from getting better governance because they do not have any means of creating awareness.…
- 1169 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Faber says to Montag, “So now do you see why books are hated and feared? They show the pores in the face of life. The comfortable people want only wax moon faces, poreless, hairless, expressionless” (Bradbury 85). His description of books helps to show Montag that books truly do have meaning behind them and can reveal the reality of human imperfections. Faber encourages Montag’s growing interest in books to continue by agreeing to help him get copies made of his book. They also agree to keep continuous communication between the two of them from then on with an ear…
- 991 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
So he contacted an old man he met awhile ago that he suspected of storing books in his house which would be illegal. The old man ended up being a retired English professor named Faber who gave his three things that are missing in their society. The first reason he gave to Montag he stated books “...show the pores in the face of life”, and that statement shows that people don’t like literature because shows the bad qualities of humans (Bradbury 83). The second reason is that people can be convinced of something because they don’t have the “leisure to digest it”, or time to think of something deeply so they believe the first thing that is said is true (Bradbury 85). The last reason was “the right to carry out actions based on what we learn from the interaction of the first two” (Bradbury 85). All of these missing things can make people believe the world is a perfect place and everyone is happy. Life needs imperfection, and if we think we know everything we would believe everything is just…
- 598 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays