2. Lareau, A. (2003) Unequal Childhoods. In M.L. Andersen & P.H. Collins (Eds.) Race, Class, & Gender (pp. 348-357)Belmont CA Thomson Wadsworth…
Research shows "61 percent of children who spend the first 10 years of life in a single-parent family were poor for the most of the period, and only 7 percent avoided poverty altogether" (Hammersley). The last issue that Kozol focuses on are the risks poor children face on a daily basis. "Early childhood experiences contribute to poor children's high rates of school failure, dropout, delinquency, early childbearing, and adult poverty" (Kozol 74). The level of developmental risk that poor children experience varies enormously and it is influenced in important ways by the depth and duration of family poverty. However, even among the long term poor, risks to child development vary according to the physical and mental health of parents, the availability of social support from outside the family, the place of residence, the resilience of children, and other circumstances. "Poor children are more likely than non-poor children to be low achievers in school, to repeat one or two grades, and to eventually drop out of school. They are more likely to engage in criminal behavior, to become unmarried…
There are many additional components that parents provide that help to give their children more resources than others classes. The separation between class amongst the upper-class families and the middle-class families. There are three major key aspects that present a clear difference between class, cultural capital, and the field. In Lareau book “Unequal Childhoods” she studies many different family situations. In her research of middle and upper-class families, she describes how there is a cycle starting from parents to class to children’s evolvement opportunity. She argues that class, race, and families lives have everything to do with your placement.…
McLanahan concludes that children who are born to educated women are gaining more resources to their every day lives. The more educated the family is, the more they are able to receive. Vise versa, the children from less educated mothers and families are gaining less resources and are unable to move forward. Education within women, particularly single moms are responsible for the changes in family formation. I concluded from McLanahan’s reading that educated mothers seem to make more of an impact on their children than educated fathers. Highly educated women are responsible for the changes in family formations and the success of their own children. Women with lower incomes tend to have children that mimic their habits within school and life. Poor mothers create less motivated children, and vise…
Everything in society, not only has an impact but it shapes the individual as well. There are many inequalities that individuals face based on their: race, socioeconomic statuses, beliefs, and because of their lack sufficient knowledge. The way one raises a child has a huge impact; however, social class has a tremendous effect on the child because that is what allows the child to experience opportunities. If the child comes from a middle class, working class or poor family there is already inequality being present unconsciously because they are exposed to different culture, system, and different capital. For instance, In Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race and Family Life, Annette Lareau analyzes how social statuses impacts parenting.…
My paper is about the effects of poverty on the African-American family. I want to explore how the absence of fathers and adequate finances leads to poor mental health and self-efficacy in low-income neighborhoods. My thesis is that the effects of poverty are the most important social factor that contributes to the academic and economic underachievement of Blacks in America.…
Both affluent and economically challenged parents make great parents, but its the parents choice that will depend on their children’s future. David Brooks writes the story “The Opportunity Gap” which describes the two types of parenting styles and shows which each parent does and does not do for their children. Affluent parents have different approaches to their child by spending more time with them and investing money for them.…
. families with higher incomes tend to be those in which the parent(s) are highly educated. This has long been true, though the link between parental educational attainment and family income has grown stronger in recent decades, as the wage returns to educational attainment have increased since 1979. Because highly educated parents are more able and more likely than less educated parents to provide resources and opportunities for their children to develop cognitive and academic skills in both the preschool years and the school-age years, children of parents with college degrees may have higher academic achievement . .…
Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. I am writing to express my appreciation to you and your assistants for your extensive research and your dedication in determining the lasting effects of unequal childhoods. I feel that this research project was important to answer the question of how unequal childhoods affect a child’s future. Your methodology was thorough and unique. You and your assistants not only interviewed children and their families, but also immersed yourselves in their family and social lives. Your research in examining how middle class, working class and poor families raise their children was very detailed and informative. Every chapter had interesting examples of how the differences affected the child or children involved.…
Being reliant on welfare for one person whom is living alone is laborious enough. Being a single parent and having to become dependent on an insufficient amount of money is even more strenuous. Parents always try to construct their children’s lives to become more suitable than their own. This is much more grueling for welfare reliant parents, substantially for a single parent who are reliant on a welfare check. A scholar once said, “A number of studies have shown that children raised in poor families are less healthy and worse off in terms of their cognitive development, school achievement, and emotional well-being”(Amato 83).…
Parents and family play a big part in children’s development and there are many elements linked to a child’s background that can affect their development.…
According to the American Psychological Association, families of low socioeconomic status (SES) are not likely to have the time and money that is needed to provide a child with academic support. For example, “Children’s initial…
As addressed by President Obama in his 2008 Father’s Day speech, getting father’s back into the business of nurturing children is highly applaudable. Like a symbolic interactionism, family itself is a symbol, not an objective, concrete reality. As interactionist, I am of the opinion that fathers and mothers should work together despite being a family of procreation to construct a family for the emotional well-being, social skills, and intellectual growth of the children which will greatly bring about a rise in the achievement gap hence pushing the effects of deprivation and isolation out of the Black communities.…
Interpreting and understanding myths depend on an individual’s personal views, beliefs, and ideas. With that in mind, the myth regarding the nuclear family and the myth of education and empowerment are all interpreted differently and argued, for and against, in many ways. Both have been perceived negatively by society, yet they have not always been a harmful folktale. Rather, the myth that education can improve someone’s life has been used, year after year, to motivate the youth in order to improve their own personal lifestyle. The myth of the nuclear family has also been used over and over again by the media as a prospective goal for everyone who wants to start a family. Although the passing of time has changed the perception of both myths throughout our society, to many, including myself, these myths continue to provide hope for a better life and a traditional family.…
Children in father-absent homes are almost four times more likely to be poor. In 2011, 12 percent of children in married-couple families were living in poverty, compared to 44 percent of children in mother-only families. But even after controlling for income, there is also the significantly high risk of incarceration in youths in father-absent households than those in mother-father families. Obviously all fatherless children do not have these kind of problems, but the statistics show that the odds are much higher than those that are in a mother-father family.…