Preview

Fears And Concerns Of Anti-Federalists Regarding Government Tyranny

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fears And Concerns Of Anti-Federalists Regarding Government Tyranny
The fears and concerns of Anti-Federalists regarding government tyranny have not become realized in today's government. Our government has not become too large and tyrannical because of the rules, laws, and papers we have in place. The rules we have in place include the checks and balances systems and our very own Bill of Rights, which safeguards the rights of the people. Our government has not overcome the fears and concerns of the Anti-Federalists regarding government tyranny because of our checks and balances system, as described in the Federalist 51 papers. Our government has three branches, the Legislative, the Judicial, and the Executive, and each branch has its very own powers to control the other branches. The Legislative Branch is …show more content…
The federal judiciary’s decisions become law, but they are also created and set up by Congress. These checks and balances keep our government stable and in control to this day, and the ability to become tyrannical is near impossible. Our government has not overcome the fears and concerns of the Anti-Federalists regarding government tyranny because of our Bill of Rights as well. The Bill of Rights was created after the creation of the Constitution, and was made to state our rights and freedoms as Americans. These rights are also called the first ten amendments of the United States. These amendments include freedoms such as freedom of speech, right to bear arms, and the right to a fair trial. Ideas like this were unheard of when the Colonies were under British Rule and creating the Bill of Rights was completely framed off of the things the British did to them. These Bill of Rights are still in effect today and our Amendments keep evolving as we discover more about this country's beliefs. To this day, any unconstitutional acts that happen from the government gets attacked immediately by the US citizens as it is their right to be treated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When a new plan of government was presented in the ratification of the Constitution, two coalitions of people were created: Federalists, who supported the new Constitution; and the Anti-Federalists, who were against the new form of government. During the Constitutional Convention, both parties presented their case, their form of government and evidence supporting why that was the best way for America to be governed. America must have a National and a State government in order to function properly…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    between two opposing political philosophies during the late 1700’s. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist parties aroused at the formation and ratification of the Constitution. Both sides pointed out many arguments in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The main conflict between the two parties revolved around the amount of power and control that the states and national government would obtain. As I am on the Federalist side, I support and agree to ratify the Constitution. For this will…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Different Views of the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist on Human Nature The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist had very conflicting views on several things; however, they did have some similar views on topics such as on human nature and how it affected government. Other common interest of the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist was the preservation of liberty and government. They both believed that there were things that men were destined to do that can not be prevented; because of…

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti-Federalist were opponents of the Constitution who saw it as a limitation to both state and human rights. “Anti-Federalists repeatedly predicted that the new government would fall under the sway of merchants, creditors, and others hostile to the interests of ordinary Americans” (Foner 272). But they lacked the leadership of the Constitution’s defender. Fearful that their influence would have diminished, there were some state politicians that were involved with the Anti-Federalists which were…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    whether the Constitution better embodied the American commitment to democracy (republicanism), or whether it produced a greater compromise to it, one must define the nature of a republican government. Both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist set forth their distinctive views on the quality of representational government, but it was James Madison and Alexander Hamilton vision I feel was the most correct. By accepting their view, it is clear that they propose the best arguments for why the Constitution establishes…

    • 1265 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists and anti-federalists were two parties that, while having a side that I personally would agree with, both had extremely reasonable arguments for their ideas. While a decent amount of anti-federalists definitely agreed that the threat factions among the people posed was very real, they believed that the solution the federalists proposed was not the correct way to go about it. The federalists were very strongly in favor of ratifying the constitution, which would give the central government…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    he is obsessed with the tyranny of European governments. He has corresponded with Samuel Adams, Richard Henry Lee, Patrick Henry, and Thomas Jefferson. He is convinced that a strong government headed by a king is and has been, the curse of mankind throughout history. Under the Articles of Confederation, Thomas's law practice has prospered, but he is concerned over the inflated value of some colonial currency. 

Thomas Abraham Clark is a ... A. Federalist B. Anti-Federalist C. Undecided Thomas…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy explores the views of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the Constitution, and they wanted the Constitution to become law or ratified. Moreover, the Federalists wanted and believed in a strong, central government. The Federalists consisted of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. On the other side, there were opponents of the Constitution (the Anti-Federalists). The…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the idea of drafting the new constitution, the Anti Federalists. The other is the Federalist, who supported the idea. The Anti-federalists argued that the new constitution would post a threat to its people freedom and liberty. They said that the constitution would give the central government too much power, and at the end may ends up like their mother land, England. But, the Federalists have a totally different view on this matter. The federalists argued that…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Debate After Articles of Confederation it was seen necessary to repeal the Articles and create one that is perfect for everyone in the country, but it wasn’t that easy. Federalists claimed that we needed a strong central government to prevent rebellions such as Shay’s Rebellion that damaged the states while the Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government could turn into a kingdom like U.K. which they have fought and damaged deeply, recently. In different…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays