Preview

Federal Judges Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
452 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federal Judges Essay
Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States. The federal judges are placed into a list that is maintained by the American Bar Association (ABA). The ABA maintains the list of federal judge hopefuls, who are ranked from well-qualified to not qualified. Most of the list comes from individual state court judges. When there is an opening for a federal judge position, the President nominates a candidate for the position. The Senate Judiciary Committee then evaluates the candidate to make sure they are appropriate for the position. The judge may take the life-term position after a majority vote has been received by the U.S. Senate (Selection of Supreme Court Justices and Federal Judges: Process & Tenure - Video & Lesson Transcript), The process to appoint a Supreme Court Justice, is somewhat like that of the federal judge, However, it is more of an intense process. Just as federal judges, the President nominates their candidates, which comes from a list that the White House Administration has made. The opinions of interest groups and lawmakers of the candidates are taking into consideration when choosing a qualified nominee (How Supreme Court Nominees Are Chosen and …show more content…
Congress is very different. The President of the United States nominates a candidate, then the nomination comes to the U.S. Senate for a vote, which the nominee is appointed to the Justice position after a majority vote from the Senate as occurred (Supreme Court Justice Nomination and Confirmation). The length a Justice serves is set for the life. A Justice can decide when to retire, or can be impeached from the position, but besides that not term length is set (How Long Do Supreme Court Justices Serve?). To be appointed to the Congress, the Congress member is elected by their congressional district, in the candidate’s home state. There are no term limits, however the terms are set for 2 years (House

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    MGT 320 Mastery Exercises

    • 2152 Words
    • 8 Pages

    a. The President has the power to nominate judges with the advice and consent of the Senate…

    • 2152 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federal courts system is made up of two types of courts; the first type is known as the Article III court. In the article III courts it includes the U.S District Courts, the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court. It also has two special courts the U.S. Court of Claims and the U.S. Court of International Trade. The judges in the federal court are appointed by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate. Federal judges remain in office a lifetime. These courts are considered special because unlike other courts, they are not of general jurisdiction that can hear almost any case. The second type of court is also established by congress and those courts are the magistrate court and bankruptcy courts.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Government Branches

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This Branch conducts and fulfills the laws that are passed by the Legislative Branch. It is guided by the President. The President is elected by the whole state. And serves a term of four years. He carries out laws, he can remove cabinet members and officials. He negotiates…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justices have predispositions to every case they decide, and most have an ideology that influences their decisions. The role of the moderates on the court is also an example of how politics effects the decisions of the court. If a president is able to appoint enough justices of his political persuasion, the court's ideological make-up will change, as will the direction of the court's decisions. Justices on the court do worry about the effect of new appointments to the Supreme Court. When President Gerald Ford appointed Justice John Paul Stevens to the court to replace Justice Douglas, Brennen and Marshall worried about the future of abortion and busing, fearing a new conservative justice might vote to overturn or limit the scope of decisions in these areas. These are a few examples of the role of politics in the Supreme…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court Fellows Commission selects the fellows through a process that includes review of submitted materials and interviews of the finalists. The Commission, which consists of a panel of distinguished judges, lawyers, and professors selected by the Chief Justice, seeks outstanding applicants who are personable, discreet, trustworthy, and committed to serving the federal judiciary.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States is democratic republic where the three branches of government each has its'…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The president and Congress have some control of the judiciary with their power to appoint and confirm appointments of judges and justices. Congress also may impeach judges, alter the organization of the federal court system, and amend the Constitution.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court justices are appointed in the same manner as all Federal Constitutional Judges, by the President with the advise of the U.S. Senate for life terms without a reduction in pay. This is to assure judicial independence. The impact would be enormous if the Supreme Court justices had to be elected to office by the people. If they were elected by the people they would not make every decision fairly, they would not be in office for life and they wouldn't be as well respected.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State Supreme Court was established through by the Constitution in Articles III of 1787 and gave it authority to hear certain appeals brought from the lower courts and the state courts. If necessary, the United State also has the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Current Power of the Branches of Our Federal Government An Opinion Brandon Parrish Fairmont State University…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just like the presidential cabinet, all justices are nominated by the president and approved by the Senate. When the president appoints a person to become a member of the judicial branch, they are in that position for the rest of their life unless…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They are appointed by the president and gets to serve for life. People would want to chose who there own supreme court justices are. In addition, they can serve there whole life for unlimited years meaning they potitionaly could become lazy in there duties and corrupt. On the other hand, when they are appointed judges it goes thought congress to make sure the person is politicly right for the job. If they do not do a fair job with good behavior they can be impeached and hold accountable for there actions. Finally they will have more wisdom and experience with being a judge because they are running for life. The judicial branch lays a major part of our national government, security and rights of our…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Branch

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamilton argues in the federalist No. 78, which branches of government, specifically the judicial branch and how it’s the weakest branch of government. Hamilton believes that the Judicial branch only has the power to judge on laws, but does not alter the actual final decisions on what the laws people need to uphold. Hamilton recognizes that you need all three branches to make a successful government function and that the judicial branch is the least powerful of the three. The legislative branch makes the laws, executive branch enforces these laws and lastly the Judicial branch needs to understand the laws that are being put forth. Being the least dangerous branch of government it still has its checks and balances being able to hold one another to be accountable for each other, but also as a Judicial branch can keep the other branches in alignment.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays