Preview

Federal Tort Claims Act

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1331 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federal Tort Claims Act
It is essential that the security and criminal justice personnel advocate, adhere to, and impose the law without prejudice or malice. The Constitution contains amendments and laws that defend and protect individuals from violation of their rights. Law enforcement and security officials retain the authority to enforce the law and ensure justice. This authority includes detaining and arresting suspects, searching and seizing property, and using deadly force in certain situations. But, with these powers officials must use discretion and act within the law thus ensure they do not violate an individual 's rights which may result in any civil or criminal liability claims (Federal Bureau of Investigation). It is vital that criminal justice and …show more content…
For countless years, regulations or resources were not available for general public to support with compensation for damages, injuries, or fatalities caused by justice and security organizations. However, United States Congress enacted the Federal Tort Claims Act in 1946 to provide society the capability to obtain pecuniary reparation from the federal government for injury or fatality from unlawful or felonious actions by federal employees. Under this act, individuals were able to bring a claim against the government for indemnity such as money damages, property loss injuries or death if in compliance with the strict limitations provided and the Act. Additionally if the loss or damages that occurred had been proven to be a result of a federal employee’s action and within their employment, the complainant is allowed to recover the amount money damages that occurred. However, claims against the government cannot proceed unless the government waives its self-governing protection or allows the file suit. It had been made possible for private parties or person to sue the United States in Federal Court through this act with certain limitations of course. The government may only be sued according to the law that governs the place where the …show more content…
A. (2005). Managing the bottom line. Risk management in policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management , 28(1), 30.,retrieved September 27, 2014, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/230814730_Managing_the_bottom_line_risk_management_in_policing

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and America 's Security Affairs. (n.d.). Retrieved September 22, 2004 from http://policy.defense.gov

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (n.d.). FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. Retrieved September 21, 2014 from http://www.fbi.gov

Justia. (n.d.). Dalehite v. United States - 346 U.S. 15 (1953). Retrieved on January 21, 2014, from http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/346/15/

Maryland State Treasurer (for pda/handhelds). (n.d.). Retrieved September 30, 2014 from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Memo on Dhs to President

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages

    I am sending you the following correspondence in reference to the Department of Homeland Security and its structure. I wish to examine the arguments for the existence of this department and the concepts and information provided in my “Police Administration” textbook about the department. I ask you to consider the question “Is the feeling of heightened security worth the risk of eroding our individual Constitutional rights and freedoms?” In this memo, I will provide my opinions to you, the President of the United States of America, on how this Criminal Justice Agency is structured and whether or not it is effectively managed.…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Proj 578 Course Project

    • 5282 Words
    • 22 Pages

    From the Department of Homeland Security’s Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2012-2016, the vision of the DHS…

    • 5282 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to become acquainted with the evolution of national incident…

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Common everyday citizens expect themselves and others in society to obey laws. Laws are obeyed for moral, ethical and legal perspectives. Laws are enforced at the local, state and federal level by police; these police can be parallel to the laws being enforced or subsequent. For example, it is common for the Federal Bureau of Investigation to become involved in a federal case; however, a local police officer can enact his authority on an initial felony action. The United States on the surface has about 12,000 local policy agencies, 49 State Police, and over 90 federal law enforcement (Wright, 2012). There is a lot of authority proceeding over millions of U.S. Citizens, therefore constitutional policing needs to be exercised in order to support…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many tort cases are frivolous, with some entering the realm of being totally ridiculous. The lawyers are not the only ones thinking of lawsuits as another way to get rich. The common American citizen brings lawsuits as a way of playing against the odds and will have a real chance to win.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    State Policy Comparison

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    State agencies are also responsible for keeping motor vehicles inspected by United States regulations (Gil, 2009). The state police agencies deal with criminal investigations, public relations as well as community initiatives (Gil, 2009). State courts have broad jurisdiction and most cases most individuals would be involved in would be robbery, traffic violations, family matters, and broken contracts (Find Law, 2011). According to the readings, “the state courts handle by far the larger number of cases and have more contact with the public than federal courts do” (Find Law, 2011, p. 1). State government courts added their own laws, which discrimination from workplace is not allowed. If any case is a state law case, the case can only be brought up in the state government courts (Find Law, 2011).…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Department of Homeland Security office. U.S. Department of Justice. 19 September 2013. Document. 09 May 2014.…

    • 2151 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hubbart, P. (2005). Making sense of search and seizure law : a Fourth Amendment handbook.…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Color of Law

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to utilize whatever force is "reasonably" necessary. The breath and scope of the use of force is vast. The spectrum begins with the physical presence of the official through the utilization…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. Department of Justice-Federal Bureau of Investigation (2005, December 19;/ Winter). Preliminary Crime Statistics for January--June 2005. Retrieved April 20, 2008, from http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel05/12192005.htm…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The police forces’ assignment - to preserve order and peace - is an unsubstantiated one convoluted by innumerable factors that appear exceptional to all situations officers have to manage, whether controlling a commotion or arresting suspects. In this case, the officers every so often are obliged to make use of force throughout their responsibilities, whether throughout an arrest or protecting the public, themselves, or their co-officers from danger. This use of force, when justifiably and appropriately implemented, embodies a fundamental constituent in maintaining a peaceful society.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The safety of the general population is far more important than the protection of the rights of one citizen. Many argue the Constitutionality of restricting civil rights in the name of public safety, but the same people lobby for law enforcement agencies to work harder to protect our citizens from domestic terrorism and other criminal acts. The two principles cannot go hand in hand, and public safety is far more important. Almost every crime and domestic terrorist act that has succeeded could have been prevented by authorities. Civil rights restrict law enforcement agencies from operating in an ideal manner. With tighter restrictions, certain people and certain actions do not slip by government agencies, and decrease the risk for a terrorist act of happening in the United States. Pubic safety of it’s people is the most important job of the government. Many times the government fails to do it’s job when more emphasis is placed on civil rights. The analysis below will present both arguments of the public safety versus civil rights debate and evaluate key issues and current laws and amendments associated with the administration of justice and security among communities. Some of those key issues are: the death penalty, gun control, pursuit driving, and hate crimes.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Police powers are defined as “legal abilities to perform actions that would otherwise be legally forbidden; they are not duties to perform actions to which the law would otherwise be indifferent” (Shiner, 1994).Police exercise powers with respect to detention and arrest, search and seizure, use of force, and interrogation of crime suspects’ .The degree to which police exercise these powers vary from one case to another. A police force with unlimited power might be more effective, but it would interfere with the freedoms citizens to enjoy. Thus, one major problem permeates the whole field of police powers: how to frame the law to give police adequate powers to perform their law enforcement duties, while at the same time ensuring that such powers do not allow arbitrary and unreasonable interference by the police with the freedom of the individual (Lambert, 1986).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two models of crime that have been opposing each other for years are the due process model and the crime control model. The due process model is the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards. Any person that is charged with a crime is required to have their rights protected by the criminal justice system under the due process model. The crime control model for law enforcement is based on the assumption of absolute reliability of police fact-finding, treats arrestees as if they are already found guilty. This paper will compare and contrast the role that the due process and crime control models have on shaping criminal procedure policy.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    [ 3 ]. US Department of the Army, Command and General Staff. The International Security Environment – C112. Fort Leavenworth, KS: C100-Foundations. 2013.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays