Preview

Federal Trade Commission's Merger Test Pursuant to the Clayton Act

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federal Trade Commission's Merger Test Pursuant to the Clayton Act
What is the Federal Trade Commission’s merger test pursuant to the Clayton Act? Why have most mergers passed this test? Can you think of any mergers that were disapproved by the government? Why? (based on Legal Challenges text Chapter 20 and Business Ethics text Chapter 16, Part III; tied to course competencies 1 and 2)

The Federal Trade Commission’s merger test pursuant to the Clayton Act requires a showing of reasonable probability of a substantial lessening of competition. Therefor the mergers must not practice price discrimination, which is the sale of the same product to comparably situated buyers at different prices; tying and exclusive dealing contracts, which are the sale of products on condition that the buyer stop dealing with the seller's competitors; corporate mergers, the acquisition of competing companies by one company; and interlocking directorates, the members of which are common members on the boards of directors of competing companies. Most mergers have passed this test because there has been very little government enforcement of the law in the past decade, and because most mergers have been vertical mergers as opposed to horizontal mergers which are subject to government challenge. One major merger that was disapproved by the government is the United Air and US Air merger, the merger was called off by the companies because the government said that they would block it and sue because the government wanted to protect the people. The government believe that if the merger was allowed to proceed, millions of consumers would have little choice but to pay higher fares and accept lower quality air service.

What is the employment at-will doctrine in the United States, and what are some of the major exceptions to the doctrine? How might the employment at-will doctrine engender a legal but immoral discharge? (based on Legal Challenges text Chapter 21 and Business Ethics text Chapter 16, Parts I and II; tied to course competencies 1, 2, 3, and 4)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Walsh, D. J. (2010). Employment Law for Human Resource Practice (Third Ed.). United States: Cengage Learning.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    egt1 task3

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Sherman Act was created in 1890 had two major provisions which was to prohibit conspiracies to restrain trade and also to outlaw monopolization. In 1914 the Clayton Act was passed to expand off of the Sherman Act. The Clayton Act strengthened the Sherman Act in several ways: price discrimination, typing contracts, acquisition, and interlocking directorates. In 1914, the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC) was created to enforce antitrust laws and the Clayton Act in particular. The FTC investigates unfair competitive practices and when appropriate issues cease-and desist orders. In 1950 the Celler-Kefauver Act was created to close the loophole the was left available from the Clayton Act’s Section 7. This clause was put in place to stop a firm from acquiring stocks in a competitive firm in order to merge. The Celler-Kefauver Act closed that loophole in order to prevent any firm from reducing the competition. (McConnell 375)…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clayton Antitrust Act

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The laws regarding regulation of cartels, trusts and monopoly in the market and overall regulation of the market in the USA were laid down in the USA, just as the US Constitution too was shaping up. The genesis of all this was in the Sherman Antitrust act in the year 1890. That act strove to control the market environment by putting a tight leash on trusts, organizations and companies which went against that act. To complement and strengthen this Sherman act, which later on turned out to be the basis of anti trust litigation by Federal government, another Act was passed sometime later, in the year 1914. This was the Clayton Antitrust act, passed by the Congress of the United States, drafted by Henry Clayton which explains the…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    18e Key Question Answer

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (Key Question) Describe the major provisions of the Sherman and Clayton acts. What government entities are responsible for enforcing those laws? Are firms permitted to initiate antitrust suits on their own against other firms?…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ____ U.S. courts have no jurisdiction over foreign businesses with operations in the United States.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What are the differences among horizontal, vertical, and conglomerate mergers? What does the U.S. government hope to achieve through the use of its antitrust policy? How do the resolutions of the IBM®, ATT®, and Microsoft® antitrust cases differ? How does international competition affect domestic antirust policy?…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Clayton antitrust act was passed in 1914. The act was drafted by Alabama Democrat Henry De Lamar Clayton. President Wilson instructed congress to come up with the act when he went into office in 1912. Wilson felt as though large companies had too many freedoms. The Act was put into effect to prohibit anticompetitive price discrimination, prohibit against certain tying and exclusive deal practices, expand power to private parties to sue and obtain triple damages, labor exemption that permitted union organizing, prohibition against ant compatible mergers. Company mergers have to go through the Federal Trade Commission and The Department of Justice for regulation to be approached. It is not uncommon for a merger to be disapproved. Like…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From the scenario for Katrina’s Candies, examine the major implications for firms entering into a merger. Explain the criteria the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission would follow when deciding on whether or not to approve a proposed merger.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A government would deem it necessary to intervene in a merger of two firms, when this merger “significantly impedes effective competition.” This could be in one of two way; unilateral or coordinated effects. These effects would “eliminate competitive constraints on a firm and increase anti-competitive coordination,” respectively. To stop anti competitive mergers the governing body must apply assessment techniques to try and evaluate the impact of mergers. It does this by first defining what market the merger would operate in, this can be done by look at demand and supply side substitution, and potential competitors. When the market has been defined one can now assess what impact the merger would have on the market in question. These techniques are explained below:…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Clayton Antitrust Act, It was passed in 1914, proscribes certain additional activities that had been discovered to fall outside the scope of the Sherman Antitrust Act. For example, the Clayton Act added certain practices to the list of impermissible activities: a. Price discrimination between different purchasers, if such discrimination tends to create a monopoly b. Exclusive dealing agreements c. Tying arrangements d. Mergers and acquisitions that substantially reduce market competition. EUROPEN UNION COMPETITON LAW: Article 82 of the EU competiton law also deals with the aspects of abuse of dominant position and predatory pricing.it states that “any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bmgt Quiz

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Which type of merger is likely to receive the closest examination by the Federal Trade Commission?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Department of Justice pursues cases dealing with many aspects of the United States law system. One portion that they deal with is violations with the Antitrust laws. Anti trust laws were established to help the consumers and create competition, which create lower prices for products and services (Department of Justice, 2017 ). One of the three Antitrust Acts, the Sherman Act outlaws monopolies. There are currently two cases the Justice Department is working with that deal with monopolies, AMC’s acquisition of Carmike Cinemas and Foreign Exchange Dealers coming together to commit a Conspiracy. Both cases are interesting and have everything to do with anticompetitive behaviors leading to taking over a market.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Under the legal doctrine of “employment at will” an employee can be lawfully terminated from her job for:…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Combination is a relatively new concept in Indian competition law. Although its roots can be traced to the erstwhile antitrust legislation, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the regulations governing combination control was put into force only in 2011. This paper thus attempts to analyse the combination regulation mechanism operating in India, with special focus on specific provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (“The Act”) and Combination Regulations, 2011 in their recently amended form.…

    • 5317 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    38, No. 4 (Winter), pp. 903-942. KASERMAN, D.L., and H. ZEISEL, 1996. “Market Definition: Implementing the Department of Justice Merger Guidelines”, Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 665-690. KAUPER, T.E., 1996. “The Problem of Market Definition Under EC Competition Law”, in B. Hawk (ed.), International Antitrust Law and Policy, London: Sweet and Maxwell. KIMMEL, S., 1987. Price Correlation and Market Definition, Economic Analysis Group Discussion Paper, US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. KORAH, V., 1990. An Introductory Guide to EEC Competition Law and Practice, 4th edition, Oxford: ESC publishing. LERNER, A., 1934. “The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Market Power”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 1, pp. 157-175. MARSHALL, A., 1890. Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan. MASSEY, P., and P. O’HARE, 1996. Competition Law and Policy in Ireland, Dublin: Oaktree Press. MORRIS, J.R., and G.R. MOSTELLER, 1991. “Defining Markets for Merger Analysis”, Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 599-640. POSNER, R., 1976. Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective, London: Chicago University Press. SCHEFFMAN, D.T., and P.T. SPILLER, 1987. “Geographic Market Definition Under the US Department of Justice Merger Guidelines”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 30. SCHRANK, W., and N. ROY, 1991. “Market Delineation in the Analysis of the United States Groundfish Market”, Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 36, No. 1 (Spring), pp. 91-154.…

    • 8374 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays