1. "From 1781 to 1787 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." Using the documents and your knowledge of the period, evaluate this statement.…
The articles of Confederation created a loose confederation. The national government had very limited powers. The National government could declare war but not raise an army, sign treaties, make alliances, and control relationships with Indians. The state's cold raise an army, and tax. There was no executive branch formed from the Articles of Confederation.…
The federalist paper #10 is an essay that was written by James Madison and the tenth of The Federalist Papers. It consisted of a series arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution.…
In conclusion, The Federalist Essays are trying to highlight the importance of a strong fully funded government and that the only way to achieve the stability needed to create such a force is through taxation. Madison is very persuasive and direct getting right to the point.…
Although there are many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution there are two principles that showcase the greatest differences; separation of powers (three branches that all have different obligations to the people of the U.S.) and checks and balances (the three branches that keep one from becoming tyrannical).…
Throughout the history of the United States it is amazing to think that it has only operated under two different constitutions. The first was the Articles of Confederation beginning March 1, 1781 and then the Constitution on June 21, 1788. After only seven years, the Articles were analyzed and re-written by a lot of the same people who constructed them. The Articles of Confederation created the national Congress. The Congress consisted of one single chamber.…
The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.…
The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…
The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although both written documents explaining how the American government would be ran, they have very distinct qualities about them. During the Constitutional Convention, instead of revising the Articles of Confederation as originally planned, those attending the meeting felt that a whole new document needed to be written. Legislation, the sovereignty of states, and the executive branch were all major differences between the two documents.…
I am going to show the similarities and differences between the articles and federalist papers. We will look at the authors of both, and how they influenced america in the modern era. First before we do anything we need to look why they each were made. The Articles were made as the US’s first ever constitution which would later be ratified to the US constitution we know today but we won’t get into that till later. All the Federalist papers were written to convey the people of New York to support the ratification of the US constitution.…
Thee American Confederation and Constitution has caused several colonist to be reluctant for several years. The United States government ratified these articles creating unity between the states and the representations for all citizens. Articles of Confederation and the Constitution are justified for an effective United States rule and law. To better understand what the level of economics and drawbacks were during this time, it is imperative to compare and contrast the situations in which the documents contradict.…
The United States has operated under two constitutions. The first was The Articles of Confederation, was in effect from March 1, 1781, when Maryland ratified it. The second was The Constitution which replaced the Articles when it was ratified by New Hampshire on June 21, 1788. Both documents are similar, but they have a lot of differences when looking at the details.…
The drafters of the Articles of Confederation wanted to make their country strong and independent. The Articles of Confederation created a national government of specific yet sharply circumscribed powers.The government wanted self-controlled states in which each state had one vote. Delegates were selected annually by the individual state legislatures and they could serve no more than three out of the six years in office. A president was elected annually by Congress and could serve no more than one year out of three. Votes were decided by majority of the states, except major questions which required the agreement of nine or more states. This government was “granted national authority in the conduct of foreign affairs, matters of war and peace,…
Article of Confederation and the Constitution Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Article of Confederation and the Constitution Introduction The article of confederation was the first constitution on the United States of America, established in 1781 between the thirteen former British colonies (Krill, 2014) . During this time, the colonies needed to unite to fight against the British government and give them power. Although the article of confederating succeeded in giving the states one voice, it failed to establish a stable nation thus giving way to the constitution. In the article of confederation, power lied within the states and the central government had little authority over them.…
People had many different opinions on the ratification of the Constitution. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists that debated on many topics of the Constitution. The main reasons were: what type of government the United States of America should have, the people controlling our government, and some of the powers they should have. The Federalists were the ones who wanted change. They wanted to make changes to the government that was originally proposed. The Federalists wanted the government to protect the people, but not abuse their powers. They wanted to have the powers divided between the national and the state governments. The Constitution also stated that the government would be divided into three branches: legislative, judicial, and executive. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists wanted the original government that was placed under the Articles of Confederation. The people that debated over these different forms of government wrote about it in what is known as, “The Federalist Papers.” There were many authors that wrote about this debate, but the main ones were: James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton.…