Preview

Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1009 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing. "A free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants......as that of the whole United States." (Brutus I) First of all, anti-federalists thought that a republic must be small and uniform to survive. The United States was a large country that had 1200 miles long and 200 miles inland, and it also had big population which had wide range of religions and races. They thought if a national government had a strong power that would insulate from the people and would abuse the power to deprive the powers belonged to the states. For instance, the legislature of the U.S had great and uncontroulable powers: the Congress would tax heavily from the states and regulate the inter-states trade; the Supreme Court would overrule state courts; and the president would come to raise and support large armies. Brutus noted Article I, Sec. 8 implied powers "the necessary and proper." It meant that the states reserved certain powers, and considerable powers could be added. Also, a strong central government would threaten the rights of common people. Because the Constitution was created by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Federalists, who most of them gained their livelihoods as merchants, shopkeepers, professionals, artisans, and commercial farmers, desired a government that would foster the growth of a market economy and facilitate trade with other countries. They also believed that society benefited when people pursued individual goals. Federalist James Madison claimed that the Constitution would be beneficial because a large republic contained more safeguards than a small one, but Anti-Federalists disagreed with that, because they favored small republics and because they feared the actions of men who would likely dominate the central government. Anti-Federalists, who were small farmers, many of them debtors, wanted nothing to do with this Constitution. They believed that the power should remain in the states. They argued that a republic must be geographically small with a homogeneous population in order to meet the needs of its people. Anti-Federalists also thought that the Constitution lacked adequate protection against corruption and abuse of power.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives at first tend to appear to be polar opposites in nature. The Federalists supported and sought to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America. Whereas the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to do so, and feared that the powers allotted in the Constitution would result in the newly birthed United States descending into a monarchy. The very same form of government that had proved dissatisfactory to the colonists in the first place. Therefore it may appear to be a moot point when deciding whether both viewpoints would be in harmony or opposition in regards to the power held by the modern presidency. The Anti-Federalists believed that power should rest with the states. However the Federalists wanted a strong central government headed by one official. This was because the Articles of Confederation (which gave the majority of power to the states) had failed miserably. However, while the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held opposite viewpoints, they had the same goal in mind: To create a free and balanced society, “It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one,” (Brutus, 25). However, due to the initial ambiguous measure the framers of the Constitution took with regards to the executive branch, there have historically been events of a United States President overstepping his boundaries and violating the merits of both U.S. and Constitutional doctrine. Therefore both the Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists would agree that in light of decisions made during George W. Bush’s consecutive terms that the modern presidency must be restricted.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalists were people who wanted and believed in the new Constitution. They had people who disagreed with them called the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist Party originated in opposition to the Democratic-Republican Party.Emphasized commercial and diplomatic harmony with Britain following the signing of the 1794 Jay Treaty. The party made a lasting impact by laying the foundations of a national economy, creating a national judicial system and formulating principles of foreign policy.Founded in 1792, dissolved in 1824.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American federalism offers a solution to fears that the people will only be ruled by majorities from different regions that contained different interests and values. In the past America was run by the Articles of Confederation but it was not strong enough to hold the nation together. Under the loose Articles of Confederation, the national and state government was unable to maintain order. After the Revolution, Americans mounted debt from purchasing goods from other countries. To solve this problem the states would tax their citizens and this caused many people to go into bankruptcy. When Shay’s Rebellion happened people started realizing that by having a less powerful national government, it created many problems within the states and it also demonstrated the importance to maintain domestic order. The framers of the constitution created a federal government that replaced the weak confederation with a more powerful national government.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anti-federalists also believed that the Constitution made government too strong. Under the Constitution, the government could levy taxes, raise an army, and control trade and commerce. This took away a lot of the power that the individual states had had under the Articles of Confederation. Anti-federalists also believed that…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period of 1801-1817 there were a couple ways the two parties of Democratic Republican and Federalists extended both strict and loose characterizations of the constitution, that shows the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison were not as much of a stereotype. The Democratic Republicans had many ways of being strict through the constitution and a couple ways of being loose. Along with the Democratic Republicans the Federalists were more strict than loose when it came to the constitution and together both the Democratic Republicans and Federalists shows hoe Jefferson and Madison were not much of a stereotype of other presidents.…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists and anti-Federalists have many differences and similarities the Federalists want the power to be in the hands of the government and wanted a stronger federal government. While anti-Federalists believed a small state would make it easier to find a common good for their citizens and were against the American Constitution. Federalism is a political concept describing the practice whereby a group of members are bound together by agreement or covenant with a governing representative head. ("Federalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia," n.d.) Federalists believed in a more vigorous centralized regime and that the states were essentially part of one combination that could play a role of laws upon all states. This party was primarily…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    money, lack of respect by foreign powers, territories in the possession of a foreign power,…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Federalists; John Day, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and James Madison, were supporters of the constitution. They believed that our nation needed a strong federal government. The reasoning behind their belief was because they found it was necessary that a strong federal government be made for the entire country. As said in the Federalist Paper number it mentions the idea of checks and balances which would prevent one branch from growing too strong and it would limit the governments power.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Southern slave states and northern non slave states big states and small states Federalists and Anti Federalists all they needed to compromise come to an agreement on several issues in order to satisfy everyone interest. Federalists wanted a strong central government with control over the states led by Alexander Hamilton. Anti Federalists feared that individual states would lose their freedom under a strong central government led by Thomas…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both sides had strong opinions and beliefs on the subject, but the side that I thought was more convincing was the Federalists side. I think the Federalists were right when they said America was in need of a stronger national government. If our government were to become weak, like the Anti-Federalists wanted, then our world would become a chaotic mess, the rules wouldn’t apply to everyone. I think that you need to have rules and laws to keep people in check, if we didn’t have them then everyone and everything would become crazy.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti-Federalist were opponents of the Constitution who saw it as a limitation to both state and human rights. “Anti-Federalists repeatedly predicted that the new government would fall under the sway of merchants, creditors, and others hostile to the interests of ordinary Americans” (Foner 272). But they lacked the leadership of the Constitution’s defender. Fearful that their influence would have diminished, there were some state politicians that were involved with the Anti-Federalists which were the “revolutionary heroes as Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and Patrick Henry” (Foner 272). Liberty was the Anti-Federalist’s watchword and they felt that it was being threatened by the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists pointed out that the Constitution…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams stated that “Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” Federalists believed this, and fought verbal and written battles against the Anti-Federalists, who disagreed with John Adams. Anti-Federalists believed that in an elite democracy, the elite’s would get greedy and selfish, and only worry about themselves. As I’m on the Federalist side, I believe that John Adams was correct in his statement, and that the government is only trying to uphold the rights and liberties that each citizen ought to have.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The U.S. Constitution is the matchless tradition that must be adhered to in the United States. It makes an elected arrangement of government in which power is imparted between the national government and the state governments. Because of federalism, both the central government and each of the state governments have its own particular court jurisdictions. Jurisdiction refers to a specific geographic region holding a characterized legitimate power. Case in point, the national government is a purview unto itself. Its force compasses the whole United States. Each one state is likewise a locale unto itself, with the ability to pass its own laws. More modest geographic territories, for example regions and urban areas, are independent locales to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays